Marketing & Analytics · head to head
June vs Mattermost

Mattermost
Communication & Collaboration
Channel-centric collaboration for secure workflows
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only June has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: June the pricing page lists a single all-in-one plan with no price, no minimum and no named cost driver; Mattermost no prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which June and Mattermost actually diverge.
| Attribute | June | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Marketing & Analytics | Communication & Collaboration |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in June
- B2B analytics
- Account tracking
- Cohort analysis
- Dashboards
- Slack
- Segment
- GDPR
- Cloud deployment
Only in Mattermost
Nothing recorded that June does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
June
- Company-level product analytics for B2B SaaSnot Mattermost
- Spotting churn risk from account usage patternsnot Mattermost
- Pushing product usage data into Salesforce, HubSpot or Attionot Mattermost
Mattermost
No use cases recorded yet. See the Mattermost review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
June
- The pricing page lists a single all-in-one plan with no price, no minimum and no named cost driver
- There is no startup plan; the vendor states June is a fit for companies with at least $1M of ARR
- Setup fees are charged separately and the vendor states they vary based on implementation complexity
- The vendor states June is a poor fit for products with a large user base but low revenue per user
Mattermost
- No prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales
- Professional is capped at a maximum of 250 users, forcing a move to Enterprise for larger teams
- Licenses are sold only as prepaid annual subscriptions, and organizations that exceed their licensed seat count must purchase additional seats on a prorated quarterly basis
Pricing, plan by plan
June
Free- FreeFree
- Basic analytics
- 1 user
- 30 days retention
Mattermost
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Mattermost review.
Which should you pick?
Choose June if
- You need b2b analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want account tracking.
Choose Mattermost if
Nothing in the data separates Mattermost from June on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is June or Mattermost better?
- Neither clearly leads. June starts at Free and Mattermost at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, June or Mattermost?
- June has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for June and On request for Mattermost.
- Does June or Mattermost run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use June for free?
- Yes. June has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Mattermost starts at On request.
- What is June best used for?
- June is most often used for company-level product analytics for b2b saas, spotting churn risk from account usage patterns, pushing product usage data into salesforce, hubspot or attio. Of those, company-level product analytics for b2b saas and spotting churn risk from account usage patterns are not what Mattermost is typically brought in for.
- What can June do that Mattermost cannot?
- June covers B2B analytics, Account tracking, Cohort analysis, Dashboards.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- June vs Crazy Egg
- June vs Ruler Analytics
- June vs Northbeam
- June vs VWO
- June vs Attribution
- June vs Countly
- June vs Dreamdata
- June vs Google Analytics
- June vs Triple Whale
- June vs AB Tasty
- June vs Adobe Analytics
- June vs Adverity
- June vs Convert
- June vs Datorama
- June vs Fathom Analytics
- June vs Funnel.io
- June vs Google Optimize
- June vs Improvado
- June vs Zoom
- June vs Microsoft Teams
- June vs Loom
- June vs RingCentral Video
- June vs Slack
- June vs Telegram
- June vs Webex by Cisco
- June vs Chanty
- June vs Chatwork
- June vs Flock
- June vs Google Chat
- June vs Grasshopper
- June vs Lark
- June vs Quo
- June vs Rocket.Chat
- June vs Signal
- June vs TeamViewer
- June vs Textline
- Mattermost vs Crazy Egg
- Mattermost vs Ruler Analytics
- Mattermost vs Northbeam
- Mattermost vs VWO
- Mattermost vs Attribution
- Mattermost vs Countly
- Mattermost vs Dreamdata
- Mattermost vs Google Analytics
- Mattermost vs Triple Whale
- Mattermost vs AB Tasty
- Mattermost vs Adobe Analytics
- Mattermost vs Adverity
- Mattermost vs Convert
- Mattermost vs Datorama
- Mattermost vs Fathom Analytics
- Mattermost vs Funnel.io
- Mattermost vs Google Optimize
- Mattermost vs Improvado
- Mattermost vs Zoom
- Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams
- Mattermost vs Loom
- Mattermost vs RingCentral Video
- Mattermost vs Slack
- Mattermost vs Telegram
- Mattermost vs Webex by Cisco
- Mattermost vs Chanty
- Mattermost vs Chatwork
- Mattermost vs Flock
- Mattermost vs Google Chat
- Mattermost vs Grasshopper
- Mattermost vs Lark
- Mattermost vs Quo
- Mattermost vs Rocket.Chat
- Mattermost vs Signal
- Mattermost vs TeamViewer
- Mattermost vs Textline

