Machine Learning · head to head
JMP vs Together AI

JMP
Machine Learning
Desktop statistical and design of experiments software from a SAS subsidiary
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: JMP it is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.; Together AI free tier limits not clearly specified in pricing documentation
- They diverge on capability: JMP covers Custom design of experiments, Together AI covers Open-source models.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which JMP and Together AI actually diverge.
| Attribute | JMP | Together AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | usage-based |
| Platforms | Mac, Windows | Api, Cloud |
| Category | Machine Learning | AI |
| Founded | 1976 | 2022 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in JMP
- Custom design of experiments
- Linked interactive graphics
- Analysis platforms
- Quality and process tools
- Graph Builder
- JSL scripting
- Scoring code export
- Predictive modelling in JMP Pro
Only in Together AI
- Open-source models
- Fine-tuning
- Fast inference
- Embeddings
- REST API
- Python SDK
- OpenAI compatible
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
JMP
- Planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already havenot Together AI
- Process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulatornot Together AI
- Exploratory analysis by an engineer or scientist who will not write code but needs more than a spreadsheetnot Together AI
- Semiconductor, chemical and pharmaceutical development groups where JMP is already the shared language for reporting resultsnot Together AI
Together AI
- LLM inference for production AI applicationsnot JMP
- Content generation at scalenot JMP
- Code execution and embeddingsnot JMP
- Model fine-tuning and trainingnot JMP
- Startup and enterprise AI deploymentnot JMP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
JMP
- It is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.
- There is no Linux build and no server edition for running analyses, so JMP cannot sit in a scheduled pipeline the way an R or Python script can, and recurring reports depend on a named person running them on a laptop.
- The predictive modelling capability most buyers mean when they call this machine learning software is in JMP Pro, a separate and more expensive licence, so the base product's price is not the price of the thing being evaluated.
- JSL is proprietary to JMP, so the scripts, add-ins and automation a group accumulates over a decade do not port anywhere and become sunk cost the moment anyone questions the renewal.
- Deployment ends at exported scoring code with no registry, monitoring or retraining, so a model that runs in production is maintained by another team in another language and steadily diverges from the version the analyst still has open.
Together AI
- Free tier limits not clearly specified in pricing documentation
- Pricing varies significantly by model and use case
- Requires account setup for production access
- Batch API discounts apply only to non-urgent workloads
Pricing, plan by plan
JMP
Free- TrialFree
- 30-day trial
- Full features
- JMP$1785/year
- Core JMP
- Standard features
Together AI
Free- Serverless Inference$0.03/1M input tokens
- Chat and Vision models
- Image generation
- Video generation
- Provisioned Throughput$21600/month
- Up to 83% savings vs commercial alternatives
- Reserved capacity
- Guaranteed throughput
- Dedicated Inference$5.49/hour
- H100 GPU instance
- Single-tenant deployment
- No resource sharing
- GPU Clusters$3.99/GPU-hour
- On-demand capacity
- Volume discounts available
- Reserved options with up to 35% savings
Which should you pick?
Choose JMP if
- You need custom design of experiments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Mac, Windows.
- You also want linked interactive graphics.
Choose Together AI if
- You need open-source models.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Api, Cloud.
- You also want fine-tuning.
Questions people ask
- Is JMP or Together AI better?
- Neither clearly leads. JMP starts at Free and Together AI at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, JMP or Together AI?
- JMP starts at Free and Together AI at Free.
- Does JMP or Together AI run on more platforms?
- JMP runs on Mac, Windows. Together AI runs on Api, Cloud.
- Can I use JMP for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is JMP best used for?
- JMP is most often used for planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already have, process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulator, exploratory analysis by an engineer or scientist who will not write code but needs more than a spreadsheet, semiconductor, chemical and pharmaceutical development groups where jmp is already the shared language for reporting results. Of those, planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already have and process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulator are not what Together AI is typically brought in for.
- What can JMP do that Together AI cannot?
- JMP covers Custom design of experiments, Linked interactive graphics, Analysis platforms, Quality and process tools. Together AI covers Open-source models, Fine-tuning, Fast inference, Embeddings.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
JMP: Is JMP the same thing as SAS?
No. JMP is a separate desktop product from a SAS subsidiary, with its own interface, its own scripting language and its own licence. Knowing SAS does not transfer to it beyond the statistics.
Together AI: Does Together AI offer a free tier?
Yes, Together AI advertises 'Start for free, scale on demand,' but specific free tier usage limits are not detailed on the pricing page.
SourceJMP: Do I need JMP Pro?
If you want cross validation, penalised regression, boosted trees or neural networks, yes. The base edition covers classical statistics, graphics and design of experiments well and stops short of predictive modelling.
Together AI: What are Together AI's highest model prices?
Serverless inference pricing ranges from free for base models up to $4.40 per 1M input tokens for premium models. Video generation costs $0.14 to $3.20 per video depending on resolution.
SourceJMP: Does it run on Linux?
No. Windows and macOS only, as an installed application.
Together AI: How much can I save with Provisioned Throughput?
Together AI offers up to 83% savings compared to commercial alternatives when using their Provisioned Throughput option with reserved capacity.
SourceJMP: Can I put a JMP model into production?
Only by exporting the scoring formula as SQL, C, Python or similar and running it in another system. JMP itself does not serve, monitor or retrain models.
Together AI: What is Together AI's fine-tuning pricing?
Standard fine-tuning costs $0.48 to $2.90 per 1M tokens depending on model size, with a minimum charge of $4.00 per job.
SourceJMP: Who actually uses it?
Process and quality engineers, and scientists in R&D, particularly in semiconductor, chemicals, pharmaceutical and medical device work. It is not usually chosen by data engineering or platform teams.
Related pages
More on Together AI
Other head to heads
- JMP vs DataRobot
- JMP vs AWS SageMaker
- JMP vs Google Vertex AI
- JMP vs Azure Machine Learning
- JMP vs IBM SPSS
- JMP vs Minitab
- JMP vs Stata
- JMP vs Jupyter
- JMP vs Weights & Biases
- JMP vs Orange
- JMP vs Databricks
- JMP vs Snowflake
- JMP vs Anaconda
- JMP vs Domino Data Lab
- JMP vs DVC
- JMP vs Fal AI
- JMP vs H2O.ai
- JMP vs Hugging Face
- JMP vs Anthropic API
- JMP vs Fathom
- JMP vs Pika
- JMP vs D-ID
- JMP vs Atlas Cloud
- JMP vs Aider
- JMP vs Stable Diffusion
- JMP vs Replicate
- JMP vs LangGraph
- JMP vs AutoGen
- JMP vs Helicone
- JMP vs AI21 Labs
- JMP vs Avathon
- JMP vs Banana
- JMP vs C3 AI Suite
- JMP vs Character.AI
- JMP vs Chatbase
- JMP vs Claude
- Together AI vs DataRobot
- Together AI vs AWS SageMaker
- Together AI vs Google Vertex AI
- Together AI vs Azure Machine Learning
- Together AI vs IBM SPSS
- Together AI vs Minitab
- Together AI vs Stata
- Together AI vs Jupyter
- Together AI vs Weights & Biases
- Together AI vs Orange
- Together AI vs Databricks
- Together AI vs Snowflake
- Together AI vs Anaconda
- Together AI vs Domino Data Lab
- Together AI vs DVC
- Together AI vs Fal AI
- Together AI vs H2O.ai
- Together AI vs Hugging Face
- Together AI vs Anthropic API
- Together AI vs Fathom
- Together AI vs Pika
- Together AI vs D-ID
- Together AI vs Atlas Cloud
- Together AI vs Aider
- Together AI vs Stable Diffusion
- Together AI vs Replicate
- Together AI vs LangGraph
- Together AI vs AutoGen
- Together AI vs Helicone
- Together AI vs AI21 Labs
- Together AI vs Avathon
- Together AI vs Banana
- Together AI vs C3 AI Suite
- Together AI vs Character.AI
- Together AI vs Chatbase
- Together AI vs Claude

