Technology · head to head
Jira vs Portworx

Portworx
Cloud
Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
- From
- $0.33/node hour
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Jira has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Jira free tier strictly limited to 10 users with only 2 GB storage; unsuitable for growing teams; Portworx bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- They diverge on capability: Jira covers Scrum boards, Portworx covers Container-native volumes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jira and Portworx actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jira
- Scrum boards
- Kanban boards
- Roadmaps
- Agile reporting
- Custom workflows
- Issue tracking
- Sprint planning
- DevOps integration
Only in Portworx
- Container-native volumes
- Failure domain placement
- Volume encryption
- Database automation
- Disaster recovery
- Autopilot capacity management
- Hardware independence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jira
- Software development teams leveraging AI-powered Rovo for trend analysis and bottleneck identificationnot Portworx
- Organisations requiring integrated issue tracking, project planning, and team alignment toolsnot Portworx
- Enterprises with 1,000+ users needing advanced analytics, security controls, and custom deployment optionsnot Portworx
Portworx
- Running a production PostgreSQL or Cassandra cluster on Kubernetes and needing the data to survive node lossnot Jira
- A platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal Kubernetes platformnot Jira
- Failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery positionnot Jira
- An OpenShift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful setsnot Jira
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jira
- Free tier strictly limited to 10 users with only 2 GB storage; unsuitable for growing teams
- Per-seat pricing ($7.91–$14.54/user/month) accumulates significantly for large teams; 50-person team costs £3,955–7,270 monthly
- Enterprise tier requires annual billing and sales contact; no transparent per-user pricing available
- Premium features (cross-team planning, advanced automation) available only at $14.54/user/month tier or above
Portworx
- Bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- A 1,000 node hour monthly minimum applies, which means small or intermittent clusters pay for capacity they do not consume.
- Replicating volumes across nodes consumes real capacity and network bandwidth, so the underlying infrastructure cost rises alongside the licence in a way the node hour rate does not show.
- Pure Storage ownership means roadmap priorities are set by an array vendor, and buyers should confirm that hardware independence remains contractual rather than assumed.
- Operating it well requires Kubernetes storage expertise, and teams that adopted Kubernetes to simplify operations often find they have added a distributed storage system to run.
Pricing, plan by plan
Jira
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 10 users
- 2 GB storage
- 100 automation rule runs per month
- Standard$7.91/user/month
- Up to 100,000 users per site
- 250 GB storage
- 1,700 automation rule runs per month
- Premium$14.54/user/month
- Unlimited storage
- 1,000 rule runs per month per paid user
- 70 credits per user monthly for Rovo
- Enterprise$null/custom
- 150 credits per user monthly for Rovo
- Multiple sites (up to 150)
- Unlimited automation rule runs
Portworx
$0.33/node hour- Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes$0.33/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Replicated persistent volumes
- Encryption and disaster recovery
- Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes$1.11/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Same capabilities on bare metal clusters
- Higher rate reflects node density
Which should you pick?
Choose Jira if
- You need scrum boards.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Web.
- You also want kanban boards.
Choose Portworx if
- You need container-native volumes.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want failure domain placement.
Questions people ask
- Is Jira or Portworx better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jira starts at Free and Portworx at $0.33/node hour, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jira or Portworx?
- Jira has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Jira and $0.33/node hour for Portworx.
- Does Jira or Portworx run on more platforms?
- Jira runs on Cloud, Web. Portworx runs on Linux.
- Can I use Jira for free?
- Yes. Jira has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Portworx starts at $0.33/node hour.
- What is Jira best used for?
- Jira is most often used for software development teams leveraging ai-powered rovo for trend analysis and bottleneck identification, organisations requiring integrated issue tracking, project planning, and team alignment tools, enterprises with 1,000+ users needing advanced analytics, security controls, and custom deployment options. Of those, software development teams leveraging ai-powered rovo for trend analysis and bottleneck identification and organisations requiring integrated issue tracking, project planning, and team alignment tools are not what Portworx is typically brought in for.
- What can Jira do that Portworx cannot?
- Jira covers Scrum boards, Kanban boards, Roadmaps, Agile reporting. Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Failure domain placement, Volume encryption, Database automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jira: What is Jira's free tier?
Jira's Free plan supports up to 10 users, includes 2 GB storage, allows 100 automation rule runs per month, and provides community support only. Ideal for small teams or evaluation.
SourcePortworx: Is Portworx tied to Pure Storage hardware?
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
Jira: How much does Jira Standard cost?
Jira Standard costs $7.91 per user per month and includes 250 GB storage, 1,700 automation rule runs per month, Rovo Search/Chat/Agents, and 9/5 regional support with 2-hour response time for critical issues.
SourcePortworx: What does a real cluster cost?
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
Jira: What is included in Jira Premium?
Jira Premium costs $14.54 per user per month and includes unlimited storage, 1,000 rule runs per user per month, 70 monthly Rovo credits, 24/7 support with 1-hour critical response, and 99.9% uptime SLA.
SourcePortworx: Is backup included?
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Jira: Does Jira offer an Enterprise plan?
Yes, Jira Enterprise is available with custom pricing (contact sales). It includes up to 150 sites, 150 monthly Rovo credits per user, unlimited automation runs, 24/7 support with 30-minute critical response, and 99.95% uptime SLA.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Jira vs Shortcut
- Jira vs Linear
- Jira vs GitHub
- Jira vs Asana
- Jira vs ClickUp
- Jira vs Figma
- Jira vs Plane
- Jira vs Kubernetes
- Jira vs LaunchDarkly
- Jira vs GitLab
- Jira vs PagerDuty
- Jira vs PyCharm
- Jira vs Neovim
- Jira vs RescueTime
- Jira vs UptimeRobot
- Jira vs Vercel
- Jira vs Zeta
- Jira vs Attio
- Jira vs OpenEBS
- Jira vs Rancher
- Jira vs Longhorn
- Jira vs Podman
- Jira vs Scaleway
- Jira vs DigitalOcean
- Jira vs Packer
- Jira vs Crossplane
- Jira vs Dokku
- Jira vs Encore
- Jira vs Fastly
- Jira vs Google Cloud Platform
- Jira vs K3s
- Jira vs Flux
- Jira vs Vagrant
- Jira vs Kustomize
- Jira vs minikube
- Portworx vs Shortcut
- Portworx vs Linear
- Portworx vs GitHub
- Portworx vs Asana
- Portworx vs ClickUp
- Portworx vs Figma
- Portworx vs Plane
- Portworx vs Kubernetes
- Portworx vs LaunchDarkly
- Portworx vs GitLab
- Portworx vs PagerDuty
- Portworx vs PyCharm
- Portworx vs Neovim
- Portworx vs RescueTime
- Portworx vs UptimeRobot
- Portworx vs Vercel
- Portworx vs Zeta
- Portworx vs Attio
- Portworx vs OpenEBS
- Portworx vs Rancher
- Portworx vs Longhorn
- Portworx vs Podman
- Portworx vs Scaleway
- Portworx vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx vs Packer
- Portworx vs Crossplane
- Portworx vs Dokku
- Portworx vs Encore
- Portworx vs Fastly
- Portworx vs Google Cloud Platform
- Portworx vs K3s
- Portworx vs Flux
- Portworx vs Vagrant
- Portworx vs Kustomize
- Portworx vs minikube

