Software · head to head
InVision vs Adobe XD

Adobe XD
Software
Design, prototype, and share user experiences
- From
- $54.99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only InVision has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: InVision service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported; Adobe XD standalone subscription eliminated - now requires expensive Creative Cloud All Apps plan
- They diverge on capability: InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Adobe XD covers Vector design tools.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which InVision and Adobe XD actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in InVision
- Interactive prototypes
- Design collaboration
- Freehand whiteboarding
- Design system manager
- Inspect mode
- Comments & feedback
- Version control
- User testing
Only in Adobe XD
- Vector design tools
- Responsive resize
- Auto-animate
- Voice prototyping
- 3D transforms
- Design systems
- Component states
- Coediting
Both cover
- Sketch
- Photoshop
- Slack
- Microsoft Teams
- Jira
- SSO
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
InVision
- Prototype creationnot Adobe XD
- Design feedbacknot Adobe XD
- Whiteboarding sessionsnot Adobe XD
- Design handoffnot Adobe XD
- User testing
Adobe XD
- Web designnot InVision
- Mobile app designnot InVision
- Design systemsnot InVision
- Interactive prototypesnot InVision
- User testing
Both are used for user testing, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
InVision
- Service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
- Workflow required constant switching between design software (Sketch/Photoshop) and InVision for prototyping, creating inefficiency
- Performance issues and glitches reported, especially with larger projects
- Limited development capabilities; required additional hosting and developer support for deployment
- Could not export working web or mobile applications without additional development
Adobe XD
- Standalone subscription eliminated - now requires expensive Creative Cloud All Apps plan
- Mac-first design tool with more limited Windows support
- Collaboration features are less mature compared to Figma
- Not open source unlike alternatives like Penpot
- Higher price point than competing standalone design tools
Pricing, plan by plan
InVision
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the InVision review.
Adobe XD
$54.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Adobe XD review.
Which should you pick?
Choose InVision if
- You need interactive prototypes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android.
- You also want design collaboration.
Choose Adobe XD if
- You need vector design tools.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows.
- You also want responsive resize.
Questions people ask
- Is InVision or Adobe XD better?
- Neither clearly leads. InVision starts at Free and Adobe XD at $54.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, InVision or Adobe XD?
- InVision has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for InVision and $54.99/month for Adobe XD.
- Does InVision or Adobe XD run on more platforms?
- InVision runs on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android. Adobe XD runs on Web, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use InVision for free?
- Yes. InVision has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Adobe XD starts at $54.99/month.
- What is InVision best used for?
- InVision is most often used for prototype creation, design feedback, whiteboarding sessions, design handoff. Of those, prototype creation and design feedback are not what Adobe XD is typically brought in for.
- What can InVision do that Adobe XD cannot?
- InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Design collaboration, Freehand whiteboarding, Design system manager. Adobe XD covers Vector design tools, Responsive resize, Auto-animate, Voice prototyping. Both handle Sketch, Photoshop, Slack, Microsoft Teams.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
InVision: Is InVision still active and supported in 2026?
No. InVision announced discontinuation of all services by end of 2024. The platform is no longer available or supported.
SourceAdobe XD: Can I use Adobe XD without a full Creative Cloud subscription?
No. Adobe XD is no longer available as a standalone subscription. It is only available as part of Creative Cloud All Apps plan priced from $54.99 to $69.99 per month.
SourceInVision: What were InVision's core features?
InVision allowed designers to transform designs into interactive prototypes and mockups for web and mobile. It supported Craft Player for Sketch, Craft Sync for Photoshop, and preview mode in Studio, enabling design-to-prototype workflows.
SourceAdobe XD: What file formats does Adobe XD support?
Adobe XD supports XD format natively, with import/export capabilities for other design formats and vector graphics.
SourceInVision: What were InVision's pricing plans?
InVision offered Free ($0), Starter ($25/month), Professional ($99/month), and Team plans. Annual billing provided a 10% discount. Free plan included basic prototyping; paid plans added collaboration and file access.
SourceInVision: Why did InVision fail in the market?
InVision's market position was disrupted by Figma, which unified design, prototyping, and collaboration in a single web-based platform. InVision required switching between design software and prototyping, creating friction and reducing competitiveness.
SourceInVision: What integrations did InVision support?
InVision integrated with design tools like Sketch and Photoshop, and supported sharing and collaboration workflows. The platform did not support deployment or direct development integration.
Source
