Softwr

ERP · head to head

IFS Cloud vs Striven

IFS Cloud logo

IFS Cloud

ERP

Single-codebase ERP, EAM and field service for asset-heavy industries

From
On request
Rated
-
Striven logo

Striven

ERP

All-in-one business management for growing companies

From
$35/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: IFS Cloud the partner ecosystem is a fraction of the size of SAP or Microsoft, so day rates for experienced IFS consultants are high and availability is genuinely constrained; a failing implementation is hard to rescue because there are few alternative firms to bring in.; Striven occasional performance issues with slow load times in some modules
  • They diverge on capability: IFS Cloud covers Single codebase, Striven covers CRM.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which IFS Cloud and Striven actually diverge.

Attributes where IFS Cloud and Striven differ
AttributeIFS CloudStriven
Starting priceOn request$35/month
Pricing modelquoteUnknown
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, WindowsWeb, Mobile, API
FoundedUnknown2008

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in IFS Cloud

  • Single codebase
  • Aviation MRO
  • Field service management
  • Enterprise asset management
  • Copperleaf decision analytics
  • Composable deployment
  • Twice-yearly release train
  • Project-driven manufacturing

Only in Striven

  • CRM
  • Project management
  • Accounting
  • HR management
  • Inventory
  • QuickBooks
  • Outlook
  • Google Workspace

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

IFS Cloud

  • An airline or defence operator that needs airworthiness-compliant maintenance records tied to the same system that runs procurement and financenot Striven
  • A utility that must justify capital asset spend to a regulator and wants the investment case and the work orders in one placenot Striven
  • A contract manufacturer running engineer-to-order projects where project accounting, shop floor and service revenue need to reconcilenot Striven
  • An industrial services firm replacing a separate ERP, CMMS and field scheduling tool with one vendor contractnot Striven

Striven

  • Software consolidationnot IFS Cloud
  • Business operationsnot IFS Cloud
  • Project-based businessesnot IFS Cloud

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

IFS Cloud

  • The partner ecosystem is a fraction of the size of SAP or Microsoft, so day rates for experienced IFS consultants are high and availability is genuinely constrained; a failing implementation is hard to rescue because there are few alternative firms to bring in.
  • Financial accounting and consolidation are the weakest part of the suite relative to the asset and service modules, and finance teams at group level often end up keeping a separate consolidation tool, which undermines the single-system business case.
  • Licensing is per capability area on top of user counts, so a scope change during implementation can produce a licence uplift that was not in the original business case, and the price is only discoverable through sales.
  • Upgrades between major releases still require regression testing of customisations, and organisations that have extended the product heavily report multi-month upgrade projects rather than the low-effort updates the cloud positioning implies.
  • IFS is private-equity owned and has acquired several companies in quick succession, so the portfolio and the roadmap have shifted more than once; a capability you buy on a roadmap promise may be delivered by an acquired product with a different data model.

Striven

  • Occasional performance issues with slow load times in some modules
  • Dated UI in places with clunky mobile app experience
  • Very limited customization options compared to enterprise ERP solutions
  • No Zapier or third-party app marketplace integration

Pricing, plan by plan

IFS Cloud

On request
  • IFS Cloud$undefined/year
    • Named and concurrent user licensing
    • Capability areas licensed separately
    • Cloud, customer-cloud or on-premises deployment

Striven

$35/month
  • Standard$35/month
    • Accounting
    • CRM and sales
    • Project management
  • Enterprise$70/month
    • All Standard features
    • Advanced customization
    • Priority support

Which should you pick?

Choose IFS Cloud if

  • You need single codebase.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
  • You also want aviation mro.

Choose Striven if

  • You need crm.
  • You work on Web, Mobile, API.
  • You also want project management.

Questions people ask

Is IFS Cloud or Striven better?
Neither clearly leads. IFS Cloud starts at On request and Striven at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, IFS Cloud or Striven?
IFS Cloud starts at On request and Striven at $35/month.
Does IFS Cloud or Striven run on more platforms?
IFS Cloud runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Striven runs on Web, Mobile, API.
What is IFS Cloud best used for?
IFS Cloud is most often used for an airline or defence operator that needs airworthiness-compliant maintenance records tied to the same system that runs procurement and finance, a utility that must justify capital asset spend to a regulator and wants the investment case and the work orders in one place, a contract manufacturer running engineer-to-order projects where project accounting, shop floor and service revenue need to reconcile, an industrial services firm replacing a separate erp, cmms and field scheduling tool with one vendor contract. Of those, an airline or defence operator that needs airworthiness-compliant maintenance records tied to the same system that runs procurement and finance and a utility that must justify capital asset spend to a regulator and wants the investment case and the work orders in one place are not what Striven is typically brought in for.
What can IFS Cloud do that Striven cannot?
IFS Cloud covers Single codebase, Aviation MRO, Field service management, Enterprise asset management. Striven covers CRM, Project management, Accounting, HR management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

IFS Cloud: Is IFS Cloud one product or a suite of separate ones?

One product on one codebase. You licence capability areas within it rather than buying separate applications, though acquired products such as Copperleaf are still being folded in.

Striven: What is Striven's pricing model?

Striven uses user-based pricing: Standard plan at $35/user/month and Enterprise plan at $70/user/month. For accounts with fewer than 5 users, an additional $25 per user applies.

Source
IFS Cloud: How much does IFS Cloud cost?

IFS does not publish pricing. Cost depends on user counts and which capability areas you licence, and implementation is usually the larger line item.

Striven: Does Striven offer a free trial or free tier?

Yes, Striven offers a 7-day free test drive with no credit card required. However, there is no permanent free version or free tier for production use.

Source
IFS Cloud: Is IFS a credible replacement for SAP S/4HANA?

In asset-heavy and service-heavy industries, yes. For a finance-first, multi-country group with complex statutory consolidation, SAP remains stronger.

Striven: What modules does Striven include?

Striven includes accounting, CRM and sales management, project management, task management, inventory, HR, OKRs, and workflow automation across all plans.

Source
IFS Cloud: Who owns IFS?

It is privately held, majority owned by EQT and Hg. That funds acquisitions but also means the portfolio changes shape.

Striven: Does Striven offer optional add-ons like customer portals?

Yes, Striven offers optional monthly portal plans: free tier for up to 100 customers/vendors/applications per month, $99/month for 500, and $499/month for unlimited access.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads