Cybersecurity · head to head
IDnow vs Sourcegraph

IDnow
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and qualified electronic signature for regulated European markets
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IDnow agent-led video identification costs several times an automated check and depends on agent availability, so peak-time queues push abandonment up at exactly the moment conversion matters.; Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IDnow and Sourcegraph actually diverge.
| Attribute | IDnow | Sourcegraph |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $16000/year |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, API | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IDnow
- VideoIdent
- AutoIdent
- eSign
- eID and NFC
- Bank identification
- EU data processing
Only in Sourcegraph
Nothing recorded that IDnow does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IDnow
- A German bank opening regulated accounts where BaFin requires a recognised identification methodnot Sourcegraph
- An insurer needing a qualified electronic signature that will survive challenge in a European courtnot Sourcegraph
- A telecom operator meeting national SIM registration identity rules across several EU statesnot Sourcegraph
- A lender wanting automated checks for low-risk applicants and video identification only for high-value casesnot Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot IDnow
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot IDnow
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot IDnow
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot IDnow
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot IDnow
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IDnow
- Agent-led video identification costs several times an automated check and depends on agent availability, so peak-time queues push abandonment up at exactly the moment conversion matters.
- Pricing is quoted with an annual volume commitment, so the accreditation advantage comes with a floor you pay whether or not you use it.
- The product is optimised for European regulatory regimes, so buyers verifying users in North America, Asia or Africa will find coverage and cost less competitive than global specialists.
- Qualified electronic signature is a separate licence from identity verification, which surprises buyers who assumed the accredited identity check made the signature capability included.
- Integration for the regulated flows is heavier than a simple SDK drop-in because the compliant journey, including consent and recording requirements, constrains the user experience you can build.
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Pricing, plan by plan
IDnow
On request- IDnow Platform$undefined/year
- Per-identification pricing that differs sharply between automated and agent-led methods
- Annual volume commitment typically required
- Qualified electronic signature licensed separately
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Which should you pick?
Choose IDnow if
- You need videoident.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want autoident.
Questions people ask
- Is IDnow or Sourcegraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. IDnow starts at On request and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IDnow or Sourcegraph?
- IDnow starts at On request and Sourcegraph at $16000/year.
- Does IDnow or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
- IDnow runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- What is IDnow best used for?
- IDnow is most often used for a german bank opening regulated accounts where bafin requires a recognised identification method, an insurer needing a qualified electronic signature that will survive challenge in a european court, a telecom operator meeting national sim registration identity rules across several eu states, a lender wanting automated checks for low-risk applicants and video identification only for high-value cases. Of those, a german bank opening regulated accounts where bafin requires a recognised identification method and an insurer needing a qualified electronic signature that will survive challenge in a european court are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
- What can IDnow do that Sourcegraph cannot?
- IDnow covers VideoIdent, AutoIdent, eSign, eID and NFC.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IDnow: Why choose it over a cheaper automated vendor?
Because in some European regimes the cheaper vendor is not legally permitted for the transaction. This is an eligibility question, not a quality one.
IDnow: Is the electronic signature included?
No. Qualified electronic signature under eIDAS is licensed separately from identity verification.
IDnow: Where is the data processed?
In European data centres, which is a requirement rather than a preference for many of its regulated customers.
Related pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- IDnow vs iDenfy
- IDnow vs Veriff
- IDnow vs Yoti
- IDnow vs Signicat
- IDnow vs Jumio
- IDnow vs Trulioo
- IDnow vs Shufti Pro
- IDnow vs Sumsub
- IDnow vs Socure
- IDnow vs Fenergo
- IDnow vs Quantexa
- IDnow vs Salient CompleteView
- IDnow vs Osano
- IDnow vs Proton Mail
- IDnow vs Brave Browser
- IDnow vs March Networks
- IDnow vs Visual Studio Code
- IDnow vs ESLint
- IDnow vs pnpm
- IDnow vs Turborepo
- IDnow vs Cody
- IDnow vs Sweep
- IDnow vs Bazel
- IDnow vs GitHub Copilot
- IDnow vs Moonrepo
- IDnow vs Nixpacks
- IDnow vs Pieces for Developers
- IDnow vs Rust
- IDnow vs Fig
- IDnow vs Frappe
- IDnow vs Git
- IDnow vs GoLand
- IDnow vs Hookdeck
- IDnow vs JFrog Artifactory
- Sourcegraph vs iDenfy
- Sourcegraph vs Veriff
- Sourcegraph vs Yoti
- Sourcegraph vs Signicat
- Sourcegraph vs Jumio
- Sourcegraph vs Trulioo
- Sourcegraph vs Shufti Pro
- Sourcegraph vs Sumsub
- Sourcegraph vs Socure
- Sourcegraph vs Fenergo
- Sourcegraph vs Quantexa
- Sourcegraph vs Salient CompleteView
- Sourcegraph vs Osano
- Sourcegraph vs Proton Mail
- Sourcegraph vs Brave Browser
- Sourcegraph vs March Networks
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Fig
- Sourcegraph vs Frappe
- Sourcegraph vs Git
- Sourcegraph vs GoLand
- Sourcegraph vs Hookdeck
- Sourcegraph vs JFrog Artifactory
