Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs RAD Studio

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

RAD Studio
Developer Tools
Cross-platform native app development with Delphi and C++Builder
- From
- $2000/perpetual
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; RAD Studio professional edition costs $2,000 for the perpetual license plus $599 for year one maintenance, totaling $2,599 before tax
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and RAD Studio actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | RAD Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $2000/perpetual |
| Pricing model | subscription | one-time |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in RAD Studio
Nothing recorded that IBM QRadar does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot RAD Studio
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot RAD Studio
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot RAD Studio
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot RAD Studio
RAD Studio
- Building Windows desktop applications with VCL componentsnot IBM QRadar
- Creating iOS and Android apps from shared Delphi codebasenot IBM QRadar
- Connecting to Oracle databases through FireDAC connectivitynot IBM QRadar
- Building REST web services that run on Linux serversnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
RAD Studio
- Professional edition costs $2,000 for the perpetual license plus $599 for year one maintenance, totaling $2,599 before tax
- Enterprise edition steps up to $3,400 license plus $1,199 maintenance, and Architect edition to $4,416 license plus $2,183 maintenance
- The perpetual license only entitles the buyer to updates for one year; continued access to new updates and upgrades requires an annually renewable Update Subscription
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
RAD Studio
$2000/perpetual- Professional Edition$2000/perpetual
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $599
- Total $2,599 + Tax
- Enterprise Edition$3400/perpetual
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $1,199
- Total $4,599 + Tax
- Architect Edition$4416/perpetual
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $2,183
- Total $6,599 + Tax
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose RAD Studio if
Nothing in the data separates RAD Studio from IBM QRadar on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or RAD Studio better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and RAD Studio at $2000/perpetual, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or RAD Studio?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and RAD Studio at $2000/perpetual.
- Does IBM QRadar or RAD Studio run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. RAD Studio runs on Web.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what RAD Studio is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that RAD Studio cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
RAD Studio: How much does RAD Studio cost?
RAD Studio uses perpetual licensing: Professional Edition $2,000 perpetual license + $599 first year maintenance ($2,599 total + tax). Enterprise Edition $3,400 license + $1,199 maintenance ($4,599 total + tax). Architect Edition $4,416 license + $2,183 maintenance ($6,599 total + tax).
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
RAD Studio: What is the difference between RAD Studio editions?
Professional Edition ($2,599 total + tax) targets individual developers. Enterprise Edition ($4,599 total + tax) adds multi-tier app capabilities. Architect Edition ($6,599 total + tax) includes advanced database and cloud features. All three include perpetual licenses.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
RAD Studio: Does RAD Studio offer Kai AI integration and discounts?
Yes, adding Kai AI to any edition provides discounts: 25% off Professional ($2,136 + tax), 30% off Enterprise ($3,394 + tax), and 40% off Architect ($4,109 + tax). This promotion is active through August 31, 2026.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs CLion
- IBM QRadar vs GNAT Pro
- IBM QRadar vs Rust
- IBM QRadar vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- IBM QRadar vs Visual Studio Code
- IBM QRadar vs JetBrains Rider
- IBM QRadar vs StackBlitz
- IBM QRadar vs Visual Studio
- IBM QRadar vs Penpot
- IBM QRadar vs GitLab CI/CD
- IBM QRadar vs Helm
- IBM QRadar vs Notepad++
- IBM QRadar vs Pants Build
- IBM QRadar vs Swagger UI
- IBM QRadar vs Yarn
- IBM QRadar vs Ansible
- IBM QRadar vs Buildkite
- IBM QRadar vs Helix
- RAD Studio vs Bitdefender Total Security
- RAD Studio vs 1Password
- RAD Studio vs Norton 360
- RAD Studio vs LastPass
- RAD Studio vs Microsoft Sentinel
- RAD Studio vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- RAD Studio vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- RAD Studio vs LogRhythm SIEM
- RAD Studio vs Recorded Future
- RAD Studio vs SentinelOne Singularity
- RAD Studio vs Proofpoint
- RAD Studio vs Trend Micro Vision One
- RAD Studio vs Arnica
- RAD Studio vs Authelia
- RAD Studio vs Authy
- RAD Studio vs Baffle
- RAD Studio vs Beyond Identity
- RAD Studio vs BeyondTrust
- RAD Studio vs CLion
- RAD Studio vs GNAT Pro
- RAD Studio vs Rust
- RAD Studio vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- RAD Studio vs Visual Studio Code
- RAD Studio vs JetBrains Rider
- RAD Studio vs StackBlitz
- RAD Studio vs Visual Studio
- RAD Studio vs Penpot
- RAD Studio vs GitLab CI/CD
- RAD Studio vs Helm
- RAD Studio vs Notepad++
- RAD Studio vs Pants Build
- RAD Studio vs Swagger UI
- RAD Studio vs Yarn
- RAD Studio vs Ansible
- RAD Studio vs Buildkite
- RAD Studio vs Helix
