Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs PartyKit

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
PartyKit
Developer Tools
Platform for building and deploying realtime multiplayer servers on the edge
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only PartyKit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; PartyKit documentation and FAQ material on the marketing site is sparse compared to larger realtime platforms.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, PartyKit covers Stateful edge servers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and PartyKit actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | PartyKit |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in PartyKit
- Stateful edge servers
- WebSocket-first API
- CRDT library compatibility
- Framework integrations
- Global edge deployment
- Custom domains
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot PartyKit
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot PartyKit
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot PartyKit
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot PartyKit
PartyKit
- Multiplayer collaborative appsnot IBM QRadar
- Realtime AI agent backendsnot IBM QRadar
- Live cursors and presencenot IBM QRadar
- Collaborative whiteboards and documentsnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
PartyKit
- Documentation and FAQ material on the marketing site is sparse compared to larger realtime platforms.
- Commercial free tier requires deploying to the user's own Cloudflare account, adding setup complexity.
- Storage on the free Individual plan clears every 24 hours, limiting it to prototyping rather than persistent production data.
- Smaller ecosystem and community than more established realtime infrastructure providers.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
PartyKit
Free- IndividualFree
- Up to 10 live projects
- Deploy to the global edge platform
- Storage clears every 24 hours
- CommercialFree
- Unlimited projects
- Custom domains
- Runs on your own Cloudflare account; pay only Cloudflare usage
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose PartyKit if
- You need stateful edge servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want websocket-first api.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or PartyKit better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and PartyKit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or PartyKit?
- PartyKit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for IBM QRadar and Free for PartyKit.
- Does IBM QRadar or PartyKit run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. PartyKit runs on web, api.
- Can I use PartyKit for free?
- Yes. PartyKit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what PartyKit is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that PartyKit cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. PartyKit covers Stateful edge servers, WebSocket-first API, CRDT library compatibility, Framework integrations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
PartyKit: How much does PartyKit cost?
PartyKit is completely free. Both the Individual and Commercial plans have no upfront costs.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
PartyKit: What is PartyKit's Individual plan?
The Individual plan is free and includes deployment to a global edge platform, support for up to 10 live projects, and is suitable for small projects. Storage is cleared every 24 hours.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
PartyKit: What is PartyKit's Commercial plan?
The Commercial plan is free but requires deploying to your own Cloudflare account. It includes custom domains, unlimited projects, and you pay only your Cloudflare usage costs.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
PartyKit: Can I upgrade from Individual to Commercial plan?
Yes, both plans are free but offer different feature sets. The Commercial plan removes project restrictions but requires managing your own Cloudflare infrastructure.
SourceIBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Soketi
- IBM QRadar vs GitHub Copilot
- IBM QRadar vs Pieces for Developers
- IBM QRadar vs CodeSandbox
- IBM QRadar vs Moonrepo
- IBM QRadar vs Swagger UI
- IBM QRadar vs Coder
- IBM QRadar vs StackBlitz
- IBM QRadar vs Deep Code
- IBM QRadar vs Refact
- IBM QRadar vs Earthly
- IBM QRadar vs Buildkite
- IBM QRadar vs SonarQube
- IBM QRadar vs Sourcegraph
- IBM QRadar vs Sweep
- IBM QRadar vs Visual Studio
- IBM QRadar vs Warp
- IBM QRadar vs Xlinesoft
- PartyKit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- PartyKit vs 1Password
- PartyKit vs Norton 360
- PartyKit vs LastPass
- PartyKit vs Microsoft Sentinel
- PartyKit vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- PartyKit vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- PartyKit vs LogRhythm SIEM
- PartyKit vs Recorded Future
- PartyKit vs SentinelOne Singularity
- PartyKit vs Proofpoint
- PartyKit vs Trend Micro Vision One
- PartyKit vs Arnica
- PartyKit vs Authelia
- PartyKit vs Authy
- PartyKit vs Baffle
- PartyKit vs Beyond Identity
- PartyKit vs BeyondTrust
- PartyKit vs Soketi
- PartyKit vs GitHub Copilot
- PartyKit vs Pieces for Developers
- PartyKit vs CodeSandbox
- PartyKit vs Moonrepo
- PartyKit vs Swagger UI
- PartyKit vs Coder
- PartyKit vs StackBlitz
- PartyKit vs Deep Code
- PartyKit vs Refact
- PartyKit vs Earthly
- PartyKit vs Buildkite
- PartyKit vs SonarQube
- PartyKit vs Sourcegraph
- PartyKit vs Sweep
- PartyKit vs Visual Studio
- PartyKit vs Warp
- PartyKit vs Xlinesoft
