Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs OVHcloud

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; OVHcloud public Cloud pricing table lists a scheduled price change with a column labeled Price on April 1, 2026, showing current rates are promotional and set to change on that date
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, OVHcloud covers Public Cloud.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and OVHcloud actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | OVHcloud |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | €3.5/month |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Linux, Windows, Api, Cli |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
| Founded | 1911 | 1999 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in OVHcloud
- Public Cloud
- Private Cloud
- Bare Metal Servers
- Managed Kubernetes
- Object Storage
- Block Storage
- Load Balancers
- Databases
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot OVHcloud
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot OVHcloud
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot OVHcloud
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot OVHcloud
OVHcloud
- Managed Kubernetes container orchestration for cloud-native applicationsnot IBM QRadar
- Virtual machine instances with customizable CPU, RAM, and IOPSnot IBM QRadar
- Object storage with S3-compatible API for scalable data archivalnot IBM QRadar
- Managed databases including PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, and ClickHousenot IBM QRadar
- Private network connectivity with vRack for multi-AZ isolationnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
OVHcloud
- Public Cloud pricing table lists a scheduled price change with a column labeled Price on April 1, 2026, showing current rates are promotional and set to change on that date
- Free network traffic and free Object Storage API calls exclude the Asia-Pacific region
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
OVHcloud
€3.5/month- Public Cloud Starter$3.5/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1 GB RAM
- 10 GB storage
- Bare Metal$49/month
- Dedicated hardware
- High performance
- Full control
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose OVHcloud if
- You need public cloud.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli.
- You also want private cloud.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or OVHcloud better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and OVHcloud at €3.5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or OVHcloud?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and OVHcloud at €3.5/month.
- Does IBM QRadar or OVHcloud run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. OVHcloud runs on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what OVHcloud is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that OVHcloud cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. OVHcloud covers Public Cloud, Private Cloud, Bare Metal Servers, Managed Kubernetes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
OVHcloud: How does OVHcloud charge for cloud services?
OVHcloud offers pay-as-you-go pricing for compute, storage, and bandwidth. Specific per-unit costs are accessed through the pricing calculator on the vendor site.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
OVHcloud: Are there savings plans for OVHcloud services?
OVHcloud mentions savings plan options on its services pages, but pricing discounts and commitment terms are not detailed on the homepage.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
OVHcloud: What is the cost of OVHcloud zero inter-AZ fees?
OVHcloud advertises zero inter-AZ (availability zone) fees for data transfers within its network. Monthly subscription rates for individual services are not published on the vendor homepage.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- IBM QRadar vs DigitalOcean
- IBM QRadar vs Grafana Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Neon
- IBM QRadar vs Scaleway
- IBM QRadar vs Oracle Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs IBM Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Lambda
- IBM QRadar vs Vultr
- IBM QRadar vs Alibaba Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Tencent Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Chef
- IBM QRadar vs Rancher
- IBM QRadar vs Upstash
- IBM QRadar vs Azure Functions
- IBM QRadar vs Deno Deploy
- IBM QRadar vs Hetzner Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Infracost
- OVHcloud vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OVHcloud vs 1Password
- OVHcloud vs Norton 360
- OVHcloud vs LastPass
- OVHcloud vs Microsoft Sentinel
- OVHcloud vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- OVHcloud vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- OVHcloud vs LogRhythm SIEM
- OVHcloud vs Recorded Future
- OVHcloud vs SentinelOne Singularity
- OVHcloud vs Proofpoint
- OVHcloud vs Trend Micro Vision One
- OVHcloud vs Arnica
- OVHcloud vs Authelia
- OVHcloud vs Authy
- OVHcloud vs Baffle
- OVHcloud vs Beyond Identity
- OVHcloud vs BeyondTrust
- OVHcloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- OVHcloud vs DigitalOcean
- OVHcloud vs Grafana Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Neon
- OVHcloud vs Scaleway
- OVHcloud vs Oracle Cloud
- OVHcloud vs IBM Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Lambda
- OVHcloud vs Vultr
- OVHcloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Tencent Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Chef
- OVHcloud vs Rancher
- OVHcloud vs Upstash
- OVHcloud vs Azure Functions
- OVHcloud vs Deno Deploy
- OVHcloud vs Hetzner Cloud
- OVHcloud vs Infracost

