Cloud · head to head
IBM Cloud vs IBM QRadar

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only IBM Cloud has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM Cloud the USD 200 starter cloud credit is valid for 30 days only; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: IBM Cloud covers Virtual Servers, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM Cloud and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM Cloud | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, Api, Cli | Web, Api |
| Category | Cloud | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2013 | 1911 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM Cloud
- Virtual Servers
- Bare Metal
- Cloud Foundry
- Kubernetes
- Watson AI
- Blockchain
- Databases
- API Gateway
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM Cloud
- Running containerized and VM workloads on IBM's public cloudnot IBM QRadar
- Building on Watson APIs and IBM middleware as managed servicesnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot IBM Cloud
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot IBM Cloud
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot IBM Cloud
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot IBM Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM Cloud
- The USD 200 starter cloud credit is valid for 30 days only
- The larger promotional credits are time boxed: USD 1,000 for Bare Metal Servers for VPC over 120 days, USD 2,500 for Power Virtual Server over 90 days, and USD 5,000 for Backup and Recovery over 90 days
- The USD 5,000 Backup and Recovery promotion is valid for new clients only and requires a checkout promo code
- The listed promotions carry an expiry date of 31 December 2026
- Beyond the free tier the account is pay as you go, so cost tracks usage with no published cap
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM Cloud
Free- Lite PlanFree
- Free services
- Limited resources
- 30-day trial
- Standard PlanFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- Enterprise support
- Advanced services
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM Cloud if
- You need virtual servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli.
- You also want bare metal.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM Cloud or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM Cloud starts at Free and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM Cloud or IBM QRadar?
- IBM Cloud has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for IBM Cloud and On request for IBM QRadar.
- Does IBM Cloud or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- IBM Cloud runs on Linux, Windows, Api, Cli. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use IBM Cloud for free?
- Yes. IBM Cloud has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is IBM Cloud best used for?
- IBM Cloud is most often used for running containerized and vm workloads on ibm's public cloud, building on watson apis and ibm middleware as managed services. Of those, running containerized and vm workloads on ibm's public cloud and building on watson apis and ibm middleware as managed services are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM Cloud do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- IBM Cloud covers Virtual Servers, Bare Metal, Cloud Foundry, Kubernetes. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM Cloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- IBM Cloud vs DigitalOcean
- IBM Cloud vs Grafana Cloud
- IBM Cloud vs Neon
- IBM Cloud vs Oracle Cloud
- IBM Cloud vs OVHcloud
- IBM Cloud vs Microsoft Azure
- IBM Cloud vs Lambda
- IBM Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- IBM Cloud vs Chef
- IBM Cloud vs Google Cloud Platform
- IBM Cloud vs Tencent Cloud
- IBM Cloud vs Packer
- IBM Cloud vs Porter
- IBM Cloud vs Rook
- IBM Cloud vs Serverless Framework
- IBM Cloud vs VictoriaMetrics
- IBM Cloud vs Vagrant
- IBM Cloud vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM Cloud vs 1Password
- IBM Cloud vs Norton 360
- IBM Cloud vs LastPass
- IBM Cloud vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM Cloud vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM Cloud vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM Cloud vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM Cloud vs Recorded Future
- IBM Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM Cloud vs Proofpoint
- IBM Cloud vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM Cloud vs Arnica
- IBM Cloud vs Authelia
- IBM Cloud vs Authy
- IBM Cloud vs Baffle
- IBM Cloud vs Beyond Identity
- IBM Cloud vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- IBM QRadar vs DigitalOcean
- IBM QRadar vs Grafana Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Neon
- IBM QRadar vs Oracle Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs OVHcloud
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Azure
- IBM QRadar vs Lambda
- IBM QRadar vs Alibaba Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Chef
- IBM QRadar vs Google Cloud Platform
- IBM QRadar vs Tencent Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Packer
- IBM QRadar vs Porter
- IBM QRadar vs Rook
- IBM QRadar vs Serverless Framework
- IBM QRadar vs VictoriaMetrics
- IBM QRadar vs Vagrant
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust

