Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Orca Security

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Orca Security
Cloud
Agentless cloud-native application protection platform for code-to-runtime security.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Orca Security no public pricing; requires a demo and custom quote from sales.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Orca Security covers Agentless cloud scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Orca Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Orca Security
- Agentless cloud scanning
- Attack path analysis
- Shadow AI detection
- Secure code development
- Alert prioritization
- Workload protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Orca Security
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Orca Security
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Orca Security
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Orca Security
Orca Security
- Gaining full cloud asset visibility without deploying agentsnot IBM QRadar
- Prioritizing cloud risk with attack path correlationnot IBM QRadar
- Detecting shadow AI usage across cloud environmentsnot IBM QRadar
- Scanning code, containers, and IaC before deploymentnot IBM QRadar
- Reducing alert fatigue through contextual risk scoringnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Orca Security
- No public pricing; requires a demo and custom quote from sales.
- Agentless-only scanning may miss some runtime telemetry that agent-based tools capture.
- Full value depends on integrating many of the platform's modules across code, cloud, and AI.
- Primarily targeted at mid-to-large organizations with multi-cloud environments.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Orca Security
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Orca Security review.
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Orca Security if
- You need agentless cloud scanning.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want attack path analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Orca Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Orca Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Orca Security?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Orca Security at On request.
- Does IBM QRadar or Orca Security run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Orca Security runs on web, api.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Orca Security is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Orca Security cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Orca Security covers Agentless cloud scanning, Attack path analysis, Shadow AI detection, Secure code development.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Orca Security: How much does Orca Security cost?
Orca Security does not publish pricing tiers or rates on their website. Organizations must contact Orca Security directly or request a demo to receive custom pricing information based on their specific use case and requirements.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
More on Orca Security
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Wiz
- IBM QRadar vs Akamai
- IBM QRadar vs Fly.io
- IBM QRadar vs Northflank
- IBM QRadar vs Encore
- IBM QRadar vs Pulumi
- IBM QRadar vs Portworx
- IBM QRadar vs Anyscale
- IBM QRadar vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- IBM QRadar vs Heroku
- IBM QRadar vs Beam Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Cerebrium
- IBM QRadar vs Longhorn
- IBM QRadar vs Oracle Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Packer
- IBM QRadar vs minikube
- IBM QRadar vs OpenTelemetry
- Orca Security vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Orca Security vs 1Password
- Orca Security vs Norton 360
- Orca Security vs LastPass
- Orca Security vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Orca Security vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Orca Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Orca Security vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Orca Security vs Recorded Future
- Orca Security vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Orca Security vs Proofpoint
- Orca Security vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Orca Security vs Arnica
- Orca Security vs Authelia
- Orca Security vs Authy
- Orca Security vs Baffle
- Orca Security vs Beyond Identity
- Orca Security vs BeyondTrust
- Orca Security vs Wiz
- Orca Security vs Akamai
- Orca Security vs Fly.io
- Orca Security vs Northflank
- Orca Security vs Encore
- Orca Security vs Pulumi
- Orca Security vs Portworx
- Orca Security vs Anyscale
- Orca Security vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Orca Security vs Heroku
- Orca Security vs Beam Cloud
- Orca Security vs Cerebrium
- Orca Security vs Longhorn
- Orca Security vs Oracle Cloud
- Orca Security vs Packer
- Orca Security vs minikube
- Orca Security vs OpenTelemetry
