Cloud · head to head
Akamai vs IBM QRadar

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akamai no public pricing available; custom quotes required; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Akamai covers CDN, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akamai and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Akamai | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1000/month | On request |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Category | Cloud | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 1998 | 1911 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akamai
- CDN
- DDoS Protection
- Web Application Firewall
- Bot Management
- Image Optimization
- Video Platform
- API Gateway
- Analytics
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akamai
- Content delivery and web performance through Ion and adaptive media deliverynot IBM QRadar
- DDoS protection, bot management and API securitynot IBM QRadar
- Running compute, Kubernetes and managed databases on Akamai's cloudnot IBM QRadar
- Edge compute with EdgeWorkersnot IBM QRadar
- Zero trust access for enterprise applicationsnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Akamai
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Akamai
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Akamai
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Akamai
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akamai
- No public pricing available; custom quotes required
- Sales-focused pricing model
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Akamai
$1000/month- CDN$1000/month
- Content delivery
- Global edge network
- Real-time analytics
- Security Suite$2000/month
- DDoS protection
- WAF
- Bot management
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Akamai or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akamai starts at $1000/month and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akamai or IBM QRadar?
- Akamai starts at $1000/month and IBM QRadar at On request.
- Does Akamai or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Akamai best used for?
- Akamai is most often used for content delivery and web performance through ion and adaptive media delivery, ddos protection, bot management and api security, running compute, kubernetes and managed databases on akamai's cloud, edge compute with edgeworkers. Of those, content delivery and web performance through ion and adaptive media delivery and ddos protection, bot management and api security are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Akamai do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Akamai covers CDN, DDoS Protection, Web Application Firewall, Bot Management. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Akamai: How is Akamai pricing structured?
Akamai emphasizes straightforward pricing with no hidden fees, no egress surprises, and no vendor lock-in, but specific pricing is not published. Regional pricing pages exist for North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and other areas, with customers directed to contact sales.
SourceIBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Akamai: Does Akamai offer a free trial?
Akamai offers a promotional trial with $100 in credits for Akamai Cloud, though conditions apply.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akamai vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Akamai vs DigitalOcean
- Akamai vs Grafana Cloud
- Akamai vs Neon
- Akamai vs Fastly
- Akamai vs Fly.io
- Akamai vs Cilium
- Akamai vs Google Cloud Platform
- Akamai vs Podman
- Akamai vs Vault
- Akamai vs K3s
- Akamai vs Lambda
- Akamai vs Beam Cloud
- Akamai vs Caddy
- Akamai vs Cerebrium
- Akamai vs DeepInfra
- Akamai vs Go
- Akamai vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Akamai vs 1Password
- Akamai vs Norton 360
- Akamai vs LastPass
- Akamai vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Akamai vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Akamai vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Akamai vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Akamai vs Recorded Future
- Akamai vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Akamai vs Proofpoint
- Akamai vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Akamai vs Arnica
- Akamai vs Authelia
- Akamai vs Authy
- Akamai vs Baffle
- Akamai vs Beyond Identity
- Akamai vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- IBM QRadar vs DigitalOcean
- IBM QRadar vs Grafana Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Neon
- IBM QRadar vs Fastly
- IBM QRadar vs Fly.io
- IBM QRadar vs Cilium
- IBM QRadar vs Google Cloud Platform
- IBM QRadar vs Podman
- IBM QRadar vs Vault
- IBM QRadar vs K3s
- IBM QRadar vs Lambda
- IBM QRadar vs Beam Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Caddy
- IBM QRadar vs Cerebrium
- IBM QRadar vs DeepInfra
- IBM QRadar vs Go
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust

