Libraries · head to head
FOLIO vs Hoopla

Hoopla
Libraries
Free library streaming app with instant borrowing, capped by a monthly checkout limit set by your library
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FOLIO fOLIO is open source with no vendor-run SaaS from the FOLIO project itself; adopters must self-host or contract a third-party hosting partner separately.; Hoopla the monthly borrow limit is a hard cap, so a heavy user runs out of checkouts partway through the month and simply cannot borrow more, unlike a queue they can wait out.
- They diverge on capability: FOLIO covers Modular app architecture, Hoopla covers Instant borrowing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FOLIO and Hoopla actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Libraries).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FOLIO
- Modular app architecture
- Circulation and check-out
- Inventory and cataloging
- Acquisitions and invoicing
- Electronic resource management
- User management
- Agreements and licenses
- Course reserves
Only in Hoopla
- Instant borrowing
- Video and music
- Monthly borrow cap
- Comics and graphic novels
- Kids mode
- Offline downloads
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FOLIO
- Academic library managementnot Hoopla
- Custom library applicationsnot Hoopla
- Consortial systemsnot Hoopla
- Electronic resource managementnot Hoopla
Hoopla
- A patron who wants to watch a specific movie or listen to an album tonight without waiting in a queuenot FOLIO
- A family wanting streaming video and music alongside books in one library-card appnot FOLIO
- A light-to-moderate reader whose habits fit comfortably inside a monthly borrow capnot FOLIO
- Someone using a Roku or Fire TV who wants library video content on the living room screennot FOLIO
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FOLIO
- FOLIO is open source with no vendor-run SaaS from the FOLIO project itself; adopters must self-host or contract a third-party hosting partner separately.
Hoopla
- The monthly borrow limit is a hard cap, so a heavy user runs out of checkouts partway through the month and simply cannot borrow more, unlike a queue they can wait out.
- Borrow limits and even Hoopla availability itself vary by library and can be reduced if a library needs to control its licensing costs, sometimes with little notice to patrons.
- Because libraries pay per checkout, a library under budget pressure may cut its Hoopla limit or drop the service entirely, which is a risk outside the app.
- The video and music catalogue is decent but noticeably smaller than Netflix or Spotify, so it is a supplement, not a replacement, for those services.
- Audio and video quality and metadata are sometimes inconsistent, particularly for older or niche titles licensed from smaller distributors.
Pricing, plan by plan
FOLIO
Free- Community EditionFree
- Modular app ecosystem
- Circulation management
- Cataloging
- Hosted (via EBSCO/Index Data)$undefined/year
- Everything in Community
- Managed hosting
- Professional support
Hoopla
Free- HooplaFree
- Free with an eligible library card
- Monthly borrow limit set by your library, commonly 5 to 15 items
- No holds queues, instant availability
Which should you pick?
Choose FOLIO if
- You need modular app architecture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want circulation and check-out.
Choose Hoopla if
- You need instant borrowing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web, Roku, Amazon Fire TV.
- You also want video and music.
Questions people ask
- Is FOLIO or Hoopla better?
- Neither clearly leads. FOLIO starts at Free and Hoopla at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FOLIO or Hoopla?
- FOLIO starts at Free and Hoopla at Free.
- Does FOLIO or Hoopla run on more platforms?
- FOLIO runs on Web, Api. Hoopla runs on iOS, Android, Web, Roku, Amazon Fire TV.
- Can I use FOLIO for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FOLIO best used for?
- FOLIO is most often used for academic library management, custom library applications, consortial systems, electronic resource management. Of those, academic library management and custom library applications are not what Hoopla is typically brought in for.
- What can FOLIO do that Hoopla cannot?
- FOLIO covers Modular app architecture, Circulation and check-out, Inventory and cataloging, Acquisitions and invoicing. Hoopla covers Instant borrowing, Video and music, Monthly borrow cap, Comics and graphic novels.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FOLIO: Is Folio free to use?
Yes, Folio is an open source library services platform built through community collaboration, with no licensing fees for the software itself.
SourceHoopla: Does Hoopla have holds queues like Libby?
No, everything is available instantly, but your library sets a monthly limit on how many items you can borrow.
FOLIO: Is Folio free for commercial use?
Folio is open source software with no inherent restrictions on commercial use, though the specific license terms should be reviewed for your use case.
SourceHoopla: What happens when I hit my monthly limit?
You cannot borrow anything further until the limit resets, usually on the first of the next month.
FOLIO: Is there professional support available for Folio?
The website does not specify whether paid support contracts or professional services are available for Folio implementation and maintenance.
SourceHoopla: Does Hoopla include movies and music, not just books?
Yes, that is one of its main differences from Libby, which only offers ebooks, audiobooks and magazines.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- FOLIO vs ArchivesSpace
- FOLIO vs CONTENTdm
- FOLIO vs Omeka
- FOLIO vs DSpace
- FOLIO vs Ex Libris Alma
- FOLIO vs Base UI
- FOLIO vs VuFind
- FOLIO vs Ant Design
- FOLIO vs LibraryThing for Libraries
- FOLIO vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- FOLIO vs Vuetify
- FOLIO vs daisyUI
- FOLIO vs Leafmap
- FOLIO vs Mantine
- FOLIO vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- FOLIO vs Libby
- FOLIO vs PDAL
- FOLIO vs CollectiveAccess
- FOLIO vs Evergreen ILS
- Hoopla vs ArchivesSpace
- Hoopla vs CONTENTdm
- Hoopla vs Omeka
- Hoopla vs DSpace
- Hoopla vs Ex Libris Alma
- Hoopla vs Base UI
- Hoopla vs VuFind
- Hoopla vs Ant Design
- Hoopla vs LibraryThing for Libraries
- Hoopla vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- Hoopla vs Vuetify
- Hoopla vs daisyUI
- Hoopla vs Leafmap
- Hoopla vs Mantine
- Hoopla vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Hoopla vs Libby
- Hoopla vs PDAL
- Hoopla vs CollectiveAccess
- Hoopla vs Evergreen ILS

