Developer Tools · head to head
Hookdeck vs SingleStore

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

SingleStore
Databases
The real-time distributed SQL database for data-intensive applications
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Free plans on both; paid from $39/mo and $0.99/mo.
- Only Hookdeck lists automatic retries; only SingleStore lists real-time Analytics.
- Where Hookdeck falls short: pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Where SingleStore falls short: high licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hookdeck and SingleStore actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hookdeck | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows | Web, Self-Managed |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for SingleStore, founded for Hookdeck.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
Only in SingleStore
- Real-time Analytics
- Fast Data Ingest
- In-memory Processing
- Distributed Architecture
- MySQL Compatible
- Columnar Storage
- Vector Search
- Kafka
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot SingleStore
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot SingleStore
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot SingleStore
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot SingleStore
SingleStore
- Transaction processingnot Hookdeck
- Data storagenot Hookdeck
- Application backendnot Hookdeck
- Reportingnot Hookdeck
- Data analyticsnot Hookdeck
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate
SingleStore
- High licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- Eventual consistency in replication: secondary replicas may lag during high write loads
- Complex operational setup requiring specialized knowledge for optimization
- Vendor lock-in due to proprietary technology without open-source alternatives
- Disorganized documentation and lack of online training resources
Pricing, plan by plan
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/mo
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/mo
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- EnterpriseOn request
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
SingleStore
Free- Free Tier$0.99/mo
- Usage-based pricing
- Limited resources
Which should you pick?
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Choose SingleStore if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-Managed.
- You also want fast data ingest.
Questions people ask
- Is Hookdeck or SingleStore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hookdeck starts at Free and SingleStore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hookdeck or SingleStore?
- Hookdeck starts at Free and SingleStore at Free.
- Does Hookdeck or SingleStore run on more platforms?
- Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows. SingleStore runs on Web, Self-Managed.
- Can I use Hookdeck for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hookdeck best used for?
- Hookdeck is most often used for a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled, fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately, debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fix, receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnel. Of those, a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled and fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately are not what SingleStore is typically brought in for.
- What can Hookdeck do that SingleStore cannot?
- Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations. SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics, Fast Data Ingest, In-memory Processing, Distributed Architecture.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
SingleStore: Does SingleStore offer a free tier?
Yes, SingleStore offers a free tier starting from $0.99/month with usage-based pricing. The free tier allows developers to evaluate the platform with limited resources before scaling to production workloads.
SourceHookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
SingleStore: Can SingleStore handle both transactional and analytical workloads?
Yes, SingleStore is a hybrid transactional/analytical processing (HTAP) database that combines operational (OLTP) and analytical (OLAP) workloads in a single unified engine, eliminating the need for separate systems.
SourceHookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
SingleStore: Does SingleStore integrate with Apache Spark?
Yes, SingleStore provides the Spark Connector 3.0 for bidirectional data integration with Apache Spark. The connector supports SQL, Python, Scala, Java, and R for data loading and extraction.
SourceHookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
SingleStore: Can SingleStore ingest data from Kafka?
Yes, SingleStore supports high-throughput streaming ingestion from Apache Kafka and other sources, enabling millions of events per second without requiring ETL pipelines or data movement.
SourceSingleStore: Is SingleStore available as cloud or self-managed?
SingleStore offers both deployment options: SingleStoreDB Cloud (managed service) and SingleStore Self-Managed for on-premises or private cloud deployments. The managed service handles infrastructure, scaling, and maintenance automatically.
SourceRelated pages
More on SingleStore
Other head to heads
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Envoy
- Hookdeck vs Istio
- Hookdeck vs GitLab
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Terraform
- Hookdeck vs GitHub
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Hookdeck vs Keil MDK
- Hookdeck vs Moonrepo
- Hookdeck vs Nx Cloud
- Hookdeck vs Apache Druid
- Hookdeck vs ClickHouse
- Hookdeck vs Redis
- Hookdeck vs DuckDB
- Hookdeck vs Elasticsearch
- Hookdeck vs TiDB
- Hookdeck vs Materialize
- Hookdeck vs TimescaleDB
- Hookdeck vs Estuary
- Hookdeck vs Fivetran HVR
- Hookdeck vs ArangoDB
- Hookdeck vs Canary Labs
- Hookdeck vs Chroma
- Hookdeck vs Cloudinary
- Hookdeck vs Convex
- Hookdeck vs Dgraph
- Hookdeck vs Apache Pinot
- Hookdeck vs Apache Flink
- SingleStore vs Jitsu
- SingleStore vs Envoy
- SingleStore vs Istio
- SingleStore vs GitLab
- SingleStore vs Spacelift
- SingleStore vs Garden
- SingleStore vs Webpack
- SingleStore vs Backstage
- SingleStore vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- SingleStore vs Dagger
- SingleStore vs Okteto
- SingleStore vs Terraform
- SingleStore vs GitHub
- SingleStore vs Harness
- SingleStore vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- SingleStore vs Keil MDK
- SingleStore vs Moonrepo
- SingleStore vs Nx Cloud
- SingleStore vs Apache Druid
- SingleStore vs ClickHouse
- SingleStore vs Redis
- SingleStore vs DuckDB
- SingleStore vs Elasticsearch
- SingleStore vs TiDB
- SingleStore vs Materialize
- SingleStore vs TimescaleDB
- SingleStore vs Estuary
- SingleStore vs Fivetran HVR
- SingleStore vs ArangoDB
- SingleStore vs Canary Labs
- SingleStore vs Chroma
- SingleStore vs Cloudinary
- SingleStore vs Convex
- SingleStore vs Dgraph
- SingleStore vs Apache Pinot
- SingleStore vs Apache Flink
