Networking · head to head
HiveMQ vs TimescaleDB

HiveMQ
Networking
Enterprise MQTT broker for industrial IoT with a published self-managed price list
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

TimescaleDB
Databases
Time-series database built on PostgreSQL for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: HiveMQ the Community Edition lacks clustering, persistence extensions, the control centre and all enterprise bridges, so a prototype built on it does not become production by buying support.; TimescaleDB inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- They diverge on capability: HiveMQ covers MQTT 5 and 3.1.1, TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HiveMQ and TimescaleDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | HiveMQ | TimescaleDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month by connections and throughput | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) |
| Category | Networking | Databases |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HiveMQ
- MQTT 5 and 3.1.1
- Native clustering
- Data Hub
- Extension framework
- Enterprise bridges
- Control centre
Only in TimescaleDB
- Time-series Optimization
- PostgreSQL Extension
- Automatic Partitioning
- Continuous Aggregates
- Native Compression
- Full SQL Support
- Real-time Analytics
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HiveMQ
- A connected vehicle fleet where devices drop off the network for hours and sessions must survivenot TimescaleDB
- An industrial plant bridging MQTT telemetry into Kafka without writing and operating the bridgenot TimescaleDB
- A utility that needs message-level schema validation so one faulty firmware release cannot corrupt the data lakenot TimescaleDB
- An IoT project that needs a self-managed broker price for a budget submission without entering a sales processnot TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
- Monitoringnot HiveMQ
- IoT datanot HiveMQ
- Financial datanot HiveMQ
- Log analyticsnot HiveMQ
- Observabilitynot HiveMQ
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HiveMQ
- The Community Edition lacks clustering, persistence extensions, the control centre and all enterprise bridges, so a prototype built on it does not become production by buying support.
- The entry commercial tiers cap at ten thousand connections, and device fleets grow, so the step to Enterprise capacity pricing arrives sooner than most projects plan for.
- It is a JVM application, so memory tuning and garbage collection behaviour become the operator’s problem at high connection counts, unlike the C-based brokers in this space.
- Extensions are written in Java against HiveMQ’s SPI, which means custom authentication logic is locked to the platform and cannot move to another broker.
- For simple use cases it is substantially heavier and more expensive than Mosquitto or EMQX, and small deployments frequently pay enterprise prices for clustering they never use.
TimescaleDB
- Inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- Operational complexity increases significantly at scale, requiring expertise in chunk tuning and autovacuum management
- Bloom filter indexes on compressed columns can return incorrect query results before upgrade
- PostgreSQL 15 support ending June 2026, forcing mandatory upgrades to PostgreSQL 16 or later
Pricing, plan by plan
HiveMQ
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- MQTT 3.1.1 and 5 support
- Single broker, no clustering
- Launch$299/month
- Ten thousand connections
- Five hundred messages per second
- Single broker deployment
- Run$499/month
- Ten thousand connections
- One thousand messages per second
- Single broker deployment
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Priced by connections and throughput
- Multi-broker and multi-site deployments
- Distributed data intelligence
TimescaleDB
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted TimescaleDB
- MIT-licensed core
- Full PostgreSQL compatibility
- Scale Plan (Cloud)$36/month
- Compute and storage charges
- Multi-node HA
- Unlimited VPCs
Which should you pick?
Choose HiveMQ if
- You need mqtt 5 and 3.1.1.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want native clustering.
Choose TimescaleDB if
- You need time-series optimization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want postgresql extension.
Questions people ask
- Is HiveMQ or TimescaleDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. HiveMQ starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HiveMQ or TimescaleDB?
- HiveMQ starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free.
- Does HiveMQ or TimescaleDB run on more platforms?
- HiveMQ runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web. TimescaleDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Can I use HiveMQ for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is HiveMQ best used for?
- HiveMQ is most often used for a connected vehicle fleet where devices drop off the network for hours and sessions must survive, an industrial plant bridging mqtt telemetry into kafka without writing and operating the bridge, a utility that needs message-level schema validation so one faulty firmware release cannot corrupt the data lake, an iot project that needs a self-managed broker price for a budget submission without entering a sales process. Of those, a connected vehicle fleet where devices drop off the network for hours and sessions must survive and an industrial plant bridging mqtt telemetry into kafka without writing and operating the bridge are not what TimescaleDB is typically brought in for.
- What can HiveMQ do that TimescaleDB cannot?
- HiveMQ covers MQTT 5 and 3.1.1, Native clustering, Data Hub, Extension framework. TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization, PostgreSQL Extension, Automatic Partitioning, Continuous Aggregates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HiveMQ: Is HiveMQ free?
The Community Edition is Apache 2.0 and free, but it has no clustering and none of the enterprise extensions.
TimescaleDB: Is TimescaleDB free?
Yes. TimescaleDB is free and open source under the Timescale License. The managed cloud service offers a free trial with $1,000 in credits expiring in 30 days.
SourceHiveMQ: What does the commercial version cost?
Self-managed Launch is 299 US dollars a month for ten thousand connections; Run is 499 with higher throughput.
TimescaleDB: What database does TimescaleDB run on top of?
TimescaleDB is a PostgreSQL extension that runs on top of PostgreSQL. You retain full PostgreSQL compatibility including SQL queries, transactions, and ecosystem tools.
SourceHiveMQ: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, both MQTT 5 and 3.1.1, including shared subscriptions and session expiry intervals.
TimescaleDB: How much can TimescaleDB compress data?
TimescaleDB offers transparent columnar compression that can reduce storage by up to 95%. Newer data remains in row-oriented format for fast writes, while older data is automatically compressed to the column store.
SourceHiveMQ: Can it bridge into Kafka?
Yes, via a commercial enterprise extension, not in the Community Edition.
TimescaleDB: Does TimescaleDB require manual partitioning?
No. TimescaleDB handles automatic time-based partitioning through hypertables. Data is automatically chunked based on time intervals, requiring no manual partition management.
SourceTimescaleDB: What PostgreSQL versions does TimescaleDB support?
As of October 2025, TimescaleDB requires PostgreSQL 16 or greater. PostgreSQL 15 support will end with the June 2026 release, after which all instances must upgrade to PostgreSQL 16.
SourceRelated pages
More on TimescaleDB
Other head to heads
- HiveMQ vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- HiveMQ vs Catchpoint
- HiveMQ vs Domotz
- HiveMQ vs NetBird
- HiveMQ vs pfSense
- HiveMQ vs Auvik
- HiveMQ vs Zabbix
- HiveMQ vs Ivanti
- HiveMQ vs Cisco Meraki
- HiveMQ vs Kentik
- HiveMQ vs LibreNMS
- HiveMQ vs OpenVPN
- HiveMQ vs Icinga
- HiveMQ vs MikroTik RouterOS
- HiveMQ vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- HiveMQ vs QuestDB
- HiveMQ vs ClickHouse
- HiveMQ vs MotherDuck
- HiveMQ vs YugabyteDB
- HiveMQ vs Apache Druid
- HiveMQ vs SingleStore
- HiveMQ vs DuckDB
- HiveMQ vs Cockroach Labs
- HiveMQ vs Amazon Aurora
- HiveMQ vs Elasticsearch
- HiveMQ vs Dgraph
- HiveMQ vs Dragonfly
- HiveMQ vs Dremio
- HiveMQ vs Fivetran HVR
- HiveMQ vs Grist
- HiveMQ vs IBM Db2
- HiveMQ vs Apache Pinot
- HiveMQ vs Apache Flink
- TimescaleDB vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- TimescaleDB vs Catchpoint
- TimescaleDB vs Domotz
- TimescaleDB vs NetBird
- TimescaleDB vs pfSense
- TimescaleDB vs Auvik
- TimescaleDB vs Zabbix
- TimescaleDB vs Ivanti
- TimescaleDB vs Cisco Meraki
- TimescaleDB vs Kentik
- TimescaleDB vs LibreNMS
- TimescaleDB vs OpenVPN
- TimescaleDB vs Icinga
- TimescaleDB vs MikroTik RouterOS
- TimescaleDB vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- TimescaleDB vs QuestDB
- TimescaleDB vs ClickHouse
- TimescaleDB vs MotherDuck
- TimescaleDB vs YugabyteDB
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Druid
- TimescaleDB vs SingleStore
- TimescaleDB vs DuckDB
- TimescaleDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Aurora
- TimescaleDB vs Elasticsearch
- TimescaleDB vs Dgraph
- TimescaleDB vs Dragonfly
- TimescaleDB vs Dremio
- TimescaleDB vs Fivetran HVR
- TimescaleDB vs Grist
- TimescaleDB vs IBM Db2
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Pinot
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Flink
