Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

Checkr vs hireEZ

Checkr logo

Checkr

Recruitment

Background check platform priced per report, with third-party court fees passed through separately

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
hireEZ logo

hireEZ

Recruitment

AI sourcing and hiring platform priced against the recruiting tool stack it consolidates

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Checkr advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties; hireEZ the solo tier at $494/month is expensive relative to seat-priced competitors like SeekOut, so it is a poor fit for an individual recruiter comparison-shopping on price alone
  • They diverge on capability: Checkr covers Package pricing, hireEZ covers Multi-platform sourcing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Checkr and hireEZ actually diverge.

Attributes where Checkr and hireEZ differ
AttributeCheckrhireEZ
Pricing modelPer report, plus pass-through court and database feesquote, enterprise pricing set against the tool stack replaced
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Chrome Extension

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Checkr

  • Package pricing
  • API and dashboard
  • Adjudication tools
  • Continuous checks
  • Candidate portal

Only in hireEZ

  • Multi-platform sourcing
  • AI screening
  • Scheduling automation
  • ATS integration
  • Funnel analytics

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Checkr

  • A company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs API-driven checks integrated into an existing ATSnot hireEZ
  • A startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account managernot hireEZ
  • An employer that needs continuous rescreening for driving-related roles rather than a one-time check at hirenot hireEZ
  • A company budgeting screening costs that needs to model court fee variance across the states it hires innot hireEZ

hireEZ

  • A talent acquisition organisation currently paying separately for sourcing, CRM, outreach, screening and scheduling tools that wants to consolidate spendnot Checkr
  • A Fortune 500-scale recruiting team wanting AI-assisted screening layered onto an existing ATS rather than a full ATS replacementnot Checkr
  • A hiring team that wants to trial consolidation claims for four weeks before signing an annual enterprise contractnot Checkr
  • A recruiter sourcing across many external platforms who wants one search interface instead of switching between LinkedIn, GitHub and other sources individuallynot Checkr

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Checkr

  • Advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties
  • Turnaround time depends on how fast individual courts process requests, which Checkr does not control and which can stretch well past the advertised average in rural or backlogged counties
  • Add-on checks such as MVR, drug screening and education verification are priced separately, so a full pre-employment package can cost significantly more than the base package price suggests
  • Enterprise-scale volume requires a custom Enterprise contract rather than the published per-report rates, so large employers cannot rely on the public pricing page to budget
  • Compliance obligations under the FCRA and state ban-the-box laws remain the employer's responsibility even though Checkr provides tooling, so legal review is still needed rather than assumed away by the platform
  • Candidate disputes and re-adjudication can add days to a hiring timeline, which matters for roles filled under time pressure

hireEZ

  • The solo tier at $494/month is expensive relative to seat-priced competitors like SeekOut, so it is a poor fit for an individual recruiter comparison-shopping on price alone
  • Enterprise pricing is set against the stack it replaces rather than a flat number, which makes it hard to sanity-check a quote without first pricing out the alternative tools precisely
  • The four-week verification period is useful diligence but also a real time cost before a team gets to a signed, working system
  • Consolidating sourcing, screening and scheduling into one vendor increases dependency risk if a single tool in that bundle underperforms compared with a dedicated point solution
  • AI-assisted conversational screening still requires human oversight to avoid biased or inconsistent scoring, and hireEZ does not remove that compliance burden from the buyer
  • Cross-platform sourcing depends on external platforms continuing to allow this kind of data access, which is a policy risk outside hireEZ's control

Pricing, plan by plan

Checkr

On request
  • Basic$29.99/report
    • SSN trace
    • Sex offender registry
    • Global watchlist
  • Essential$59.99/report
    • Everything in Basic
    • Identity verification
    • Unlimited county criminal search
  • Complete$94.99/report
    • Everything in Essential
    • Unlimited state criminal search
    • Federal criminal search

hireEZ

On request
  • Solo$494/month
    • AI sourcing
    • 7-day free trial
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Priced against the stack hireEZ replaces
    • Four-week verification period before contract

Which should you pick?

Choose Checkr if

  • You need package pricing.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want api and dashboard.
Checkr review

Choose hireEZ if

  • You need multi-platform sourcing.
  • You work on Web, Chrome Extension.
  • You also want ai screening.
hireEZ review

Questions people ask

Is Checkr or hireEZ better?
Neither clearly leads. Checkr starts at On request and hireEZ at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Checkr or hireEZ?
Checkr starts at On request and hireEZ at On request.
Does Checkr or hireEZ run on more platforms?
Checkr runs on Web, API. hireEZ runs on Web, Chrome Extension.
What is Checkr best used for?
Checkr is most often used for a company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs api-driven checks integrated into an existing ats, a startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account manager, an employer that needs continuous rescreening for driving-related roles rather than a one-time check at hire, a company budgeting screening costs that needs to model court fee variance across the states it hires in. Of those, a company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs api-driven checks integrated into an existing ats and a startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account manager are not what hireEZ is typically brought in for.
What can Checkr do that hireEZ cannot?
Checkr covers Package pricing, API and dashboard, Adjudication tools, Continuous checks. hireEZ covers Multi-platform sourcing, AI screening, Scheduling automation, ATS integration.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Checkr: Does the per-report price include court fees?

No. Checkr states that standard third-party court and database access fees are passed through at cost on top of the package price, and these vary by jurisdiction.

hireEZ: Is there a flat published price for teams?

No, only the solo recruiter tier ($494/month) is published; team and enterprise pricing is quoted against the tools being replaced.

Checkr: Can Checkr be used without an ATS integration?

Yes, checks can be ordered manually through the Checkr dashboard as well as programmatically through the API.

hireEZ: Does hireEZ replace our ATS?

No, it integrates with more than 40 ATS platforms rather than replacing them.

Checkr: Is pricing different for enterprise volume?

Yes, high-volume employers negotiate an Enterprise contract rather than paying the published per-report rates.

hireEZ: Is there a trial before committing to an annual contract?

Enterprise deals include a stated four-week verification period; the solo tier has a 7-day free trial.

Share

Related pages

More on Checkr

More on hireEZ

Keep looking

Other head to heads