Manufacturing · head to head
Hippo CMMS vs Tulip

Hippo CMMS
Manufacturing
Straightforward maintenance management, now part of Eptura
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tulip
Manufacturing
Frontline operations platform for manufacturing
- From
- $100/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hippo CMMS no longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price; Tulip minimum 10 interface commitment increases entry cost
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hippo CMMS and Tulip actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hippo CMMS | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $100/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hippo CMMS
- Interactive site maps
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Equipment records
- Vendor management
- Mobile access
Only in Tulip
Nothing recorded that Hippo CMMS does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hippo CMMS
- Facilities teams wanting a CMMS that a non-specialist can operatenot Tulip
- Sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find itnot Tulip
- Existing Hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within Epturanot Tulip
- Organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suitenot Tulip
Tulip
- Production floor apps and dashboardsnot Hippo CMMS
- Quality and assembly workflowsnot Hippo CMMS
- Sensor data integrationnot Hippo CMMS
- Regulated industry manufacturingnot Hippo CMMS
- Multi-site operational dashboardsnot Hippo CMMS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hippo CMMS
- No longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against MaintainX or Limble without a sales process
- The simplicity that was its selling point becomes a ceiling for organisations with complex asset hierarchies
- Reporting is basic against competitors that have invested heavily in analytics
- Product direction now follows Eptura workplace strategy rather than maintenance-specific needs
Tulip
- Minimum 10 interface commitment increases entry cost
- Enterprise and Regulated pricing not transparent
- Complex per-interface billing model
Pricing, plan by plan
Hippo CMMS
On request- Eptura Asset$undefined/month
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Asset records
Tulip
$100/month- Essentials$100/month
- Apps, Tulip AI, Tables, Analytics
- Mobile/desktop/touchscreen access
- USB device integrations
- Professional$250/month
- All Essentials features
- Advanced edge connectivity
- SSO/SAML/LDAP
- Enterprise$null/month
- All Professional features
- Workspaces, app approval workflows
- Custom roles, multilingual apps
- Regulated Industries$null/month
- eSignatures (21 CFR Part 11)
- Auditable record history
- Zero data loss protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Hippo CMMS if
- You need interactive site maps.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want work order management.
Choose Tulip if
Nothing in the data separates Tulip from Hippo CMMS on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Hippo CMMS or Tulip better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hippo CMMS starts at On request and Tulip at $100/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hippo CMMS or Tulip?
- Hippo CMMS starts at On request and Tulip at $100/month.
- Does Hippo CMMS or Tulip run on more platforms?
- Hippo CMMS runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tulip runs on Web.
- What is Hippo CMMS best used for?
- Hippo CMMS is most often used for facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate, sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it, existing hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within eptura, organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suite. Of those, facilities teams wanting a cmms that a non-specialist can operate and sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find it are not what Tulip is typically brought in for.
- What can Hippo CMMS do that Tulip cannot?
- Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Work order management, Preventive maintenance, Equipment records.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hippo CMMS: Is Hippo CMMS still available?
Not as a standalone purchase. It was acquired by Eptura and its capabilities are part of Eptura Asset. Existing customers are still served.
Tulip: How is Tulip pricing calculated?
Tulip pricing is based on 'Monthly Active Interfaces (MAI)', the number of devices running Tulip Player applications with activity during at least one day per month. Minimum commitment is 10 interfaces.
SourceHippo CMMS: What was distinctive about it?
Interactive facility maps. Placing assets on a floor plan and raising work orders from the drawing is a genuinely different way to navigate a site, and it is why it retained users against slicker competitors.
Tulip: Does Tulip offer a free tier or trial?
No free plan is mentioned on the Tulip pricing page. All pricing tiers require direct contact with sales for quotes and requires a minimum 10 interface commitment.
SourceHippo CMMS: What does it cost?
Not published. Eptura quotes, which is a change from Hippo, whose pricing was easier to establish.
Tulip: What is the difference between Essentials and Professional tiers?
Professional ($250/MAI/month) adds advanced edge connectivity, SSO/SAML/LDAP, 3rd-party HTTP/SQL integrations, custom widgets, and higher AI Action/automation task limits compared to Essentials ($100/MAI/month).
SourceHippo CMMS: Should a new buyer consider it?
Evaluate Eptura Asset on its own terms, against MaintainX and Limble. Choosing it because of Hippo reviews written before the acquisition is a mistake.
Hippo CMMS: What happens to existing customers?
They continue to be supported within Eptura. The practical question is whether the broader workplace suite fits, since that is where the product roadmap now points.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hippo CMMS vs Maintenance Connection
- Hippo CMMS vs eMaint
- Hippo CMMS vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Hippo CMMS vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Hippo CMMS vs OpenBOM
- Hippo CMMS vs Propel
- Hippo CMMS vs ProShop ERP
- Hippo CMMS vs Fusion 360
- Hippo CMMS vs SolidWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs MachineMetrics
- Hippo CMMS vs LabVIEW
- Hippo CMMS vs AVEVA System Platform
- Hippo CMMS vs 3YOURMIND
- Hippo CMMS vs AMFG
- Hippo CMMS vs Aras Innovator
- Hippo CMMS vs Arena PLM
- Hippo CMMS vs Authentise
- Hippo CMMS vs Prodsmart
- Hippo CMMS vs Fulcrum
- Hippo CMMS vs QAD Redzone
- Hippo CMMS vs Flow Software
- Hippo CMMS vs Guidewheel
- Hippo CMMS vs Oqton
- Hippo CMMS vs Kepware Server
- Hippo CMMS vs Litmus Edge
- Hippo CMMS vs Markforged Eiger
- Hippo CMMS vs Materialise Magics
- Hippo CMMS vs MOVUS
- Tulip vs Maintenance Connection
- Tulip vs eMaint
- Tulip vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Tulip vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Tulip vs OpenBOM
- Tulip vs Propel
- Tulip vs ProShop ERP
- Tulip vs Fusion 360
- Tulip vs SolidWorks
- Tulip vs MachineMetrics
- Tulip vs LabVIEW
- Tulip vs AVEVA System Platform
- Tulip vs 3YOURMIND
- Tulip vs AMFG
- Tulip vs Aras Innovator
- Tulip vs Arena PLM
- Tulip vs Authentise
- Tulip vs Prodsmart
- Tulip vs Fulcrum
- Tulip vs QAD Redzone
- Tulip vs Flow Software
- Tulip vs Guidewheel
- Tulip vs Oqton
- Tulip vs Kepware Server
- Tulip vs Litmus Edge
- Tulip vs Markforged Eiger
- Tulip vs Materialise Magics
- Tulip vs MOVUS
