Developer Tools · head to head
Harness vs Very Good Security

Harness
Developer Tools
Software delivery platform across CI, CD, security testing and cost management
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Harness has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Harness essentials and Enterprise pricing requires sales contact; no published rates; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Harness and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Harness | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | freemium | Per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, API |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Harness
Nothing recorded that Very Good Security does not also cover.
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Harness
- Deploying apps to AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud with rollbacksnot Very Good Security
- Integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before productionnot Very Good Security
- Automating cloud cost reduction and tracking unit-level expensesnot Very Good Security
- Enabling developers to provision infrastructure without operations bottlenecksnot Very Good Security
- Assessing deployment frequency and lead time productivity metricsnot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Harness
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Harness
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Harness
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Harness
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Harness
- Essentials and Enterprise pricing requires sales contact; no published rates
- DevOps Essentials has no on-premises deployment option
- Internal Developer Portal requires minimum 20 developer licenses
- Pipeline execution history retention 6 months (Essentials) vs 25 months as add-on (Enterprise)
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
Harness
Free- FreeFree
- Starter platform for software delivery lifecycle
- Open source options available (Harness Open Source, Litmus Chaos)
- Essentials$null/month
- Growing organizations with small to mid-size teams
- Packaged DevOps Essentials bundle
- Continuous software delivery capabilities
- Enterprise$null/month
- Large-scale organizations
- Pick any modules based on needs
- Advanced features
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Harness or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Harness starts at Free and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Harness or Very Good Security?
- Harness has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Harness and $1000/month for Very Good Security.
- Does Harness or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- Harness runs on Web. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Harness for free?
- Yes. Harness has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Very Good Security starts at $1000/month.
- What is Harness best used for?
- Harness is most often used for deploying apps to aws, azure, and google cloud with rollbacks, integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before production, automating cloud cost reduction and tracking unit-level expenses, enabling developers to provision infrastructure without operations bottlenecks. Of those, deploying apps to aws, azure, and google cloud with rollbacks and integrating security scanners throughout build pipelines before production are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Harness do that Very Good Security cannot?
- Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Harness: Is there a free Harness plan?
Yes, Harness offers a free plan for individual developers and small teams with open source options including Harness Open Source and Litmus Chaos.
SourceVery Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
Harness: What are Harness's paid pricing tiers?
Harness offers Essentials for growing teams and Enterprise for large-scale organizations. Both require contacting sales for custom pricing. Pricing is based on modules and features selected.
SourceVery Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
Harness: Can Harness be deployed on-premises?
Enterprise plans include self-managed platform deployment option. DevOps Essentials bundle does not offer on-premises deployment.
SourceVery Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- Harness vs Spacelift
- Harness vs Visual Studio Code
- Harness vs ESLint
- Harness vs pnpm
- Harness vs Turborepo
- Harness vs Atlantis
- Harness vs Backstage
- Harness vs Octopus Deploy
- Harness vs HCP Terraform
- Harness vs Argo CD
- Harness vs Blacksmith
- Harness vs Garden
- Harness vs Namespace
- Harness vs Nix
- Harness vs Nixpacks
- Harness vs Okteto
- Harness vs OpsLevel
- Harness vs Baffle
- Harness vs HashiCorp Vault
- Harness vs Feedzai
- Harness vs Securiti
- Harness vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Harness vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Harness vs LastPass
- Harness vs DataGrail
- Harness vs 1Password
- Harness vs Transcend
- Harness vs Doppler
- Harness vs Tuta
- Harness vs Delinea
- Harness vs Envysion
- Harness vs Frontegg
- Harness vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs Spacelift
- Very Good Security vs Visual Studio Code
- Very Good Security vs ESLint
- Very Good Security vs pnpm
- Very Good Security vs Turborepo
- Very Good Security vs Atlantis
- Very Good Security vs Backstage
- Very Good Security vs Octopus Deploy
- Very Good Security vs HCP Terraform
- Very Good Security vs Argo CD
- Very Good Security vs Blacksmith
- Very Good Security vs Garden
- Very Good Security vs Namespace
- Very Good Security vs Nix
- Very Good Security vs Nixpacks
- Very Good Security vs Okteto
- Very Good Security vs OpsLevel
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary
