Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

Checkr vs HackerRank

Checkr logo

Checkr

Recruitment

Background check platform priced per report, with third-party court fees passed through separately

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
HackerRank logo

HackerRank

Recruitment

Technical hiring platform with a metered attempt allowance and per-attempt overage charges on its entry tier

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Checkr advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties; HackerRank the Starter tier meters candidate assessment attempts (120 a year included) with roughly 20 US dollars per additional attempt, so a hiring surge or an unexpectedly popular job posting turns directly into overage costs.
  • They diverge on capability: Checkr covers Package pricing, HackerRank covers Coding assessments.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Checkr and HackerRank actually diverge.

Attributes where Checkr and HackerRank differ
AttributeCheckrHackerRank
Pricing modelPer report, plus pass-through court and database feesPer month by tier, with a metered annual candidate attempt allowance and per-attempt overage on Starter
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Checkr

  • Package pricing
  • API and dashboard
  • Adjudication tools
  • Continuous checks
  • Candidate portal

Only in HackerRank

  • Coding assessments
  • Structured technical interviews
  • Screen and Interview modules
  • Role-specific question libraries
  • Proctoring and integrity checks
  • ATS integration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Checkr

  • A company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs API-driven checks integrated into an existing ATSnot HackerRank
  • A startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account managernot HackerRank
  • An employer that needs continuous rescreening for driving-related roles rather than a one-time check at hirenot HackerRank
  • A company budgeting screening costs that needs to model court fee variance across the states it hires innot HackerRank

HackerRank

  • A startup hiring a small, steady volume of engineers where the Starter plan's 120 annual attempts comfortably covers the pipelinenot Checkr
  • A larger engineering organisation needing unlimited user seats across many hiring managers, better served by Pronot Checkr
  • A company wanting both automated screening and live structured technical interviews in one platformnot Checkr
  • An organisation that wants a large, established question library spanning algorithms, system design and role-specific skillsnot Checkr

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Checkr

  • Advertised per-report prices exclude court and database access fees, so the real cost per candidate varies by jurisdiction and is higher than the sticker in many counties
  • Turnaround time depends on how fast individual courts process requests, which Checkr does not control and which can stretch well past the advertised average in rural or backlogged counties
  • Add-on checks such as MVR, drug screening and education verification are priced separately, so a full pre-employment package can cost significantly more than the base package price suggests
  • Enterprise-scale volume requires a custom Enterprise contract rather than the published per-report rates, so large employers cannot rely on the public pricing page to budget
  • Compliance obligations under the FCRA and state ban-the-box laws remain the employer's responsibility even though Checkr provides tooling, so legal review is still needed rather than assumed away by the platform
  • Candidate disputes and re-adjudication can add days to a hiring timeline, which matters for roles filled under time pressure

HackerRank

  • The Starter tier meters candidate assessment attempts (120 a year included) with roughly 20 US dollars per additional attempt, so a hiring surge or an unexpectedly popular job posting turns directly into overage costs.
  • Starter includes only one user licence, so any team with more than one recruiter or hiring manager needing direct platform access must jump to the far larger Pro commitment.
  • The jump from Starter to Pro is a large step, roughly 100 to 450 US dollars a month, with no published mid-tier option for a team that has outgrown Starter but does not need Pro's full scale.
  • As with any automated coding assessment tool, heavy reliance on it as an early filter risks screening out strong candidates who underperform in artificial timed test conditions.
  • Enterprise-tier features such as custom question libraries and SSO are quote-only, making full cost comparison against Codility or other competitors impossible without entering a sales process.

Pricing, plan by plan

Checkr

On request
  • Basic$29.99/report
    • SSN trace
    • Sex offender registry
    • Global watchlist
  • Essential$59.99/report
    • Everything in Basic
    • Identity verification
    • Unlimited county criminal search
  • Complete$94.99/report
    • Everything in Essential
    • Unlimited state criminal search
    • Federal criminal search

HackerRank

On request
  • Starter$100/month
    • 1 user licence
    • Screen and Interview modules included
    • 120 candidate attempts per year included, roughly $20 per additional attempt
  • Pro$450/month
    • Unlimited user seats
    • 4,000+ question library
    • ATS integrations included
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Custom quote
    • Custom question libraries and SSO
    • Dedicated support and account management

Which should you pick?

Choose Checkr if

  • You need package pricing.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want api and dashboard.
Checkr review

Choose HackerRank if

  • You need coding assessments.
  • You also want structured technical interviews.
HackerRank review

Questions people ask

Is Checkr or HackerRank better?
Neither clearly leads. Checkr starts at On request and HackerRank at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Checkr or HackerRank?
Checkr starts at On request and HackerRank at On request.
Does Checkr or HackerRank run on more platforms?
Checkr runs on Web, API. HackerRank runs on Web.
What is Checkr best used for?
Checkr is most often used for a company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs api-driven checks integrated into an existing ats, a startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account manager, an employer that needs continuous rescreening for driving-related roles rather than a one-time check at hire, a company budgeting screening costs that needs to model court fee variance across the states it hires in. Of those, a company running high-volume hourly or gig hiring that needs api-driven checks integrated into an existing ats and a startup or mid-size employer wanting self-service ordering through a dashboard without a dedicated screening account manager are not what HackerRank is typically brought in for.
What can Checkr do that HackerRank cannot?
Checkr covers Package pricing, API and dashboard, Adjudication tools, Continuous checks. HackerRank covers Coding assessments, Structured technical interviews, Screen and Interview modules, Role-specific question libraries.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Checkr: Does the per-report price include court fees?

No. Checkr states that standard third-party court and database access fees are passed through at cost on top of the package price, and these vary by jurisdiction.

HackerRank: What happens if we exceed our included assessment attempts on Starter?

Each additional attempt beyond the included 120 a year is billed separately, at roughly 20 US dollars per attempt.

Checkr: Can Checkr be used without an ATS integration?

Yes, checks can be ordered manually through the Checkr dashboard as well as programmatically through the API.

HackerRank: How many users does Starter support?

One user licence; teams needing more than one seat must move to the Pro plan.

Checkr: Is pricing different for enterprise volume?

Yes, high-volume employers negotiate an Enterprise contract rather than paying the published per-report rates.

HackerRank: Does HackerRank offer live interviews as well as automated tests?

Yes, both a Screen module for automated assessment and an Interview module for live, collaborative technical interviews are included from Starter upward.

Share

Related pages

More on Checkr

More on HackerRank

Keep looking

Other head to heads