Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

Grype vs LogRhythm SIEM

Grype logo

Grype

Cybersecurity

Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
LogRhythm SIEM logo

LogRhythm SIEM

Cybersecurity

AI-powered SIEM platform for modern security operations

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Grype has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Grype depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem; LogRhythm SIEM no pricing published; sales contact required
  • They diverge on capability: Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, LogRhythm SIEM covers AI-driven analytics.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Grype and LogRhythm SIEM actually diverge.

Attributes where Grype and LogRhythm SIEM differ
AttributeGrypeLogRhythm SIEM
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelOpen source, no licence feesubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsLinux, macOS, Windows, DockerWeb, Api
FoundedUnknown2003

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Grype

  • Image and filesystem scanning
  • SBOM-driven
  • Wide ecosystem coverage
  • Pipeline friendly

Only in LogRhythm SIEM

  • AI-driven analytics
  • UEBA
  • NDR integration
  • SOAR automation
  • Threat lifecycle management
  • Case management
  • Compliance reporting
  • Embedded playbooks

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Grype

  • Re-scanning stored SBOMs as new CVEs are published, without rebuilding imagesnot LogRhythm SIEM
  • Failing CI when a build introduces a known vulnerabilitynot LogRhythm SIEM
  • Auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party imagenot LogRhythm SIEM

LogRhythm SIEM

  • Security information and event managementnot Grype
  • Threat detection and incident responsenot Grype
  • Compliance monitoring and reportingnot Grype
  • User and entity behavior analyticsnot Grype

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Grype

  • Depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
  • No triage, exception tracking or reporting UI — that is Anchore’s commercial product
  • Overlaps heavily with Trivy, and most teams pick one rather than running both

LogRhythm SIEM

  • No pricing published; sales contact required
  • No public information on licensing model or per-unit costs

Pricing, plan by plan

Grype

Free
  • GrypeFree
    • Full functionality
    • No usage limits
    • Community support

LogRhythm SIEM

On request
  • LogRhythm SIEMFree
    • Threat detection
    • Log management
    • Compliance
  • LogRhythm AxonFree
    • Cloud-native SIEM
    • Self-service deployment
    • Elastic scaling
  • Managed Detection & ResponseFree
    • 24/7 monitoring
    • Expert analysts
    • Threat hunting

Which should you pick?

Choose Grype if

  • You need image and filesystem scanning.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
  • You also want sbom-driven.
Grype review

Choose LogRhythm SIEM if

  • You need ai-driven analytics.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want ueba.
LogRhythm SIEM review

Questions people ask

Is Grype or LogRhythm SIEM better?
Neither clearly leads. Grype starts at Free and LogRhythm SIEM at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Grype or LogRhythm SIEM?
Grype has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Grype and On request for LogRhythm SIEM.
Does Grype or LogRhythm SIEM run on more platforms?
Grype runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. LogRhythm SIEM runs on Web, Api.
Can I use Grype for free?
Yes. Grype has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. LogRhythm SIEM starts at On request.
What is Grype best used for?
Grype is most often used for re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images, failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability, auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party image. Of those, re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images and failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability are not what LogRhythm SIEM is typically brought in for.
What can Grype do that LogRhythm SIEM cannot?
Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, SBOM-driven, Wide ecosystem coverage, Pipeline friendly. LogRhythm SIEM covers AI-driven analytics, UEBA, NDR integration, SOAR automation.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Grype: Is Grype free?

Yes, open source from Anchore. Anchore Enterprise is the paid platform around it.

LogRhythm SIEM: How does Exabeam (formerly LogRhythm SIEM) handle pricing?

Exabeam does not publish pricing on its website. To obtain pricing information, request a demo through the website or contact Exabeam's sales team directly for a personalized quote based on your deployment size and requirements.

Source
Grype: What is the difference between Grype and Syft?

Syft generates the software bill of materials; Grype matches that inventory against vulnerability data. They are designed to be used together.

LogRhythm SIEM: Is there a free trial or freemium version of Exabeam?

Exabeam does not advertise a free trial or freemium tier on its homepage. Interested buyers must contact the sales team to discuss trial availability and pricing options.

Source
Grype: Grype or Trivy?

They cover similar ground. Trivy is broader out of the box, including misconfiguration and secret scanning; Grype pairs more cleanly with an SBOM-first workflow.

Share

Related pages

More on Grype

More on LogRhythm SIEM

Keep looking

Other head to heads