Cybersecurity · head to head
Grype vs Lago

Grype
Cybersecurity
Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Lago
Accounting
Open-source billing infrastructure for usage-based models
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grype depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem; Lago free tier limited to 10,000 entities per month with 5M event cap
- They diverge on capability: Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, Lago covers Real-time usage metering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grype and Lago actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grype
- Image and filesystem scanning
- SBOM-driven
- Wide ecosystem coverage
- Pipeline friendly
Only in Lago
- Real-time usage metering
- Multiple pricing models
- Automated invoicing
- Prepaid credits
- Entitlements
- Multi-currency support
- Payment orchestration
- Revenue analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grype
- Re-scanning stored SBOMs as new CVEs are published, without rebuilding imagesnot Lago
- Failing CI when a build introduces a known vulnerabilitynot Lago
- Auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party imagenot Lago
Lago
- Building usage-based billing for high-volume APIs and infrastructurenot Grype
- Implementing metered billing for AI and tokenized servicesnot Grype
- Creating subscription and hybrid pricing modelsnot Grype
- Managing multi-currency billing for global companiesnot Grype
- Maintaining billing infrastructure without vendor lock-innot Grype
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grype
- Depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- No triage, exception tracking or reporting UI — that is Anchore’s commercial product
- Overlaps heavily with Trivy, and most teams pick one rather than running both
Lago
- Free tier limited to 10,000 entities per month with 5M event cap
- No specific pricing published for Pro annual plan or Scale plan
- Self-hosted and on-premise deployments require engineering resources
- Community support only on free tier
- Scale plan requires annual contracts and sales engagement
Pricing, plan by plan
Grype
Free- GrypeFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Lago
Free- Build (Free)Free
- 10,000 managed entities per month
- 5M usage events per month
- 1K events per second rate limit
- Pro$399/month
- 10,000 entities included (graduated pricing to 100K)
- 25M usage events included (to 500M with graduated rates)
- 10K events per second (upgradeable to 100K)
- Scale$null/custom
- Custom entity and event volumes
- 50K events per second (upgradeable to 100K)
- RBAC and SSO (SAML)
Which should you pick?
Choose Grype if
- You need image and filesystem scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want sbom-driven.
Choose Lago if
- You need real-time usage metering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted, On-premise, VPC.
- You also want multiple pricing models.
Questions people ask
- Is Grype or Lago better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grype starts at Free and Lago at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grype or Lago?
- Grype starts at Free and Lago at Free.
- Does Grype or Lago run on more platforms?
- Grype runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. Lago runs on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted, On-premise, VPC.
- Can I use Grype for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grype best used for?
- Grype is most often used for re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images, failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability, auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party image. Of those, re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images and failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability are not what Lago is typically brought in for.
- What can Grype do that Lago cannot?
- Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, SBOM-driven, Wide ecosystem coverage, Pipeline friendly. Lago covers Real-time usage metering, Multiple pricing models, Automated invoicing, Prepaid credits.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Grype: Is Grype free?
Yes, open source from Anchore. Anchore Enterprise is the paid platform around it.
Lago: Can I use Lago open-source for free?
Yes, Lago is open-source under the AGPLv3 license and can be self-hosted. The cloud-based Build plan is also free with limits of 10,000 entities and 5M events per month.
SourceGrype: What is the difference between Grype and Syft?
Syft generates the software bill of materials; Grype matches that inventory against vulnerability data. They are designed to be used together.
Lago: What payment providers does Lago integrate with?
Lago integrates with Stripe and Adyen for payment processing. It is not a payment processor itself but orchestrates payments through these providers.
SourceGrype: Grype or Trivy?
They cover similar ground. Trivy is broader out of the box, including misconfiguration and secret scanning; Grype pairs more cleanly with an SBOM-first workflow.
Lago: Does Lago support multiple currencies?
Yes, Lago supports multi-currency billing with automatic currency conversion for global businesses.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Grype vs Trivy
- Grype vs Snyk
- Grype vs Semgrep
- Grype vs Chainguard
- Grype vs HashiCorp Vault
- Grype vs Bitwarden
- Grype vs Infisical
- Grype vs Authelia
- Grype vs Ory Kratos
- Grype vs OWASP ZAP
- Grype vs Cosign
- Grype vs authentik
- Grype vs Socket
- Grype vs Socure
- Grype vs SonicWall
- Grype vs Sophos Intercept X
- Grype vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Grype vs Sticky Password
- Grype vs Orb
- Grype vs Metronome
- Grype vs Stigg
- Grype vs Dodo Payments
- Grype vs Creem
- Grype vs Invoicera
- Grype vs Polar
- Grype vs Maxio
- Grype vs Zuora
- Grype vs Paddle
- Grype vs Invoicely
- Grype vs QuickBooks
- Grype vs Mercury
- Grype vs Mesh Payments
- Grype vs Money Forward Cloud
- Grype vs Moneybird
- Grype vs MYOB
- Grype vs Netvisor
- Lago vs Trivy
- Lago vs Snyk
- Lago vs Semgrep
- Lago vs Chainguard
- Lago vs HashiCorp Vault
- Lago vs Bitwarden
- Lago vs Infisical
- Lago vs Authelia
- Lago vs Ory Kratos
- Lago vs OWASP ZAP
- Lago vs Cosign
- Lago vs authentik
- Lago vs Socket
- Lago vs Socure
- Lago vs SonicWall
- Lago vs Sophos Intercept X
- Lago vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Lago vs Sticky Password
- Lago vs Orb
- Lago vs Metronome
- Lago vs Stigg
- Lago vs Dodo Payments
- Lago vs Creem
- Lago vs Invoicera
- Lago vs Polar
- Lago vs Maxio
- Lago vs Zuora
- Lago vs Paddle
- Lago vs Invoicely
- Lago vs QuickBooks
- Lago vs Mercury
- Lago vs Mesh Payments
- Lago vs Money Forward Cloud
- Lago vs Moneybird
- Lago vs MYOB
- Lago vs Netvisor
