Cybersecurity · head to head
Grype vs Helm

Grype
Cybersecurity
Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grype depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem; Helm licensed under Apache License 2.0 per the project's GitHub repository (helm/helm LICENSE); as open source software it has no paid tier or vendor price to compare
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grype and Helm actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grype
- Image and filesystem scanning
- SBOM-driven
- Wide ecosystem coverage
- Pipeline friendly
Only in Helm
Nothing recorded that Grype does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grype
- Re-scanning stored SBOMs as new CVEs are published, without rebuilding imagesnot Helm
- Failing CI when a build introduces a known vulnerabilitynot Helm
- Auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party imagenot Helm
Helm
- Kubernetes package manager and deployment toolnot Grype
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grype
- Depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- No triage, exception tracking or reporting UI — that is Anchore’s commercial product
- Overlaps heavily with Trivy, and most teams pick one rather than running both
Helm
- Licensed under Apache License 2.0 per the project's GitHub repository (helm/helm LICENSE); as open source software it has no paid tier or vendor price to compare
- Contributors must sign commits under the Developer Certificate of Origin to have them accepted, per helm.sh, a process requirement not all Kubernetes tools impose
Pricing, plan by plan
Grype
Free- GrypeFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Helm
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Helm review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Grype if
- You need image and filesystem scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want sbom-driven.
Questions people ask
- Is Grype or Helm better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grype starts at Free and Helm at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grype or Helm?
- Grype starts at Free and Helm at Free.
- Does Grype or Helm run on more platforms?
- Grype runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. Helm runs on Web.
- Can I use Grype for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grype best used for?
- Grype is most often used for re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images, failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability, auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party image. Of those, re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images and failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability are not what Helm is typically brought in for.
- What can Grype do that Helm cannot?
- Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, SBOM-driven, Wide ecosystem coverage, Pipeline friendly.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Grype: Is Grype free?
Yes, open source from Anchore. Anchore Enterprise is the paid platform around it.
Helm: How much does Helm cost?
Helm is free and open-source. It is a graduated project in the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) with no commercial pricing model.
SourceGrype: What is the difference between Grype and Syft?
Syft generates the software bill of materials; Grype matches that inventory against vulnerability data. They are designed to be used together.
Grype: Grype or Trivy?
They cover similar ground. Trivy is broader out of the box, including misconfiguration and secret scanning; Grype pairs more cleanly with an SBOM-first workflow.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Grype vs Trivy
- Grype vs Snyk
- Grype vs Semgrep
- Grype vs Chainguard
- Grype vs HashiCorp Vault
- Grype vs Bitwarden
- Grype vs Infisical
- Grype vs Authelia
- Grype vs Ory Kratos
- Grype vs OWASP ZAP
- Grype vs Cosign
- Grype vs authentik
- Grype vs Socket
- Grype vs Socure
- Grype vs SonicWall
- Grype vs Sophos Intercept X
- Grype vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Grype vs Sticky Password
- Grype vs pnpm
- Grype vs Visual Studio Code
- Grype vs ESLint
- Grype vs Turborepo
- Grype vs Argo CD
- Grype vs Yarn
- Grype vs Nix
- Grype vs Okteto
- Grype vs Moonrepo
- Grype vs Nx Cloud
- Grype vs Pants Build
- Grype vs Buildkite
- Grype vs Ansible
- Grype vs Helix
- Grype vs JetBrains Rider
- Grype vs Spacelift
- Helm vs Trivy
- Helm vs Snyk
- Helm vs Semgrep
- Helm vs Chainguard
- Helm vs HashiCorp Vault
- Helm vs Bitwarden
- Helm vs Infisical
- Helm vs Authelia
- Helm vs Ory Kratos
- Helm vs OWASP ZAP
- Helm vs Cosign
- Helm vs authentik
- Helm vs Socket
- Helm vs Socure
- Helm vs SonicWall
- Helm vs Sophos Intercept X
- Helm vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Helm vs Sticky Password
- Helm vs pnpm
- Helm vs Visual Studio Code
- Helm vs ESLint
- Helm vs Turborepo
- Helm vs Argo CD
- Helm vs Yarn
- Helm vs Nix
- Helm vs Okteto
- Helm vs Moonrepo
- Helm vs Nx Cloud
- Helm vs Pants Build
- Helm vs Buildkite
- Helm vs Ansible
- Helm vs Helix
- Helm vs JetBrains Rider
- Helm vs Spacelift
