Developer Tools · head to head
Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Netwrix

Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Developer Tools
Cloud development environments repositioned as a control plane for software engineering agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Netwrix
Cybersecurity
Data access governance and change auditing across Active Directory, file shares and Microsoft 365
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ona (formerly Gitpod) acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.; Netwrix the portfolio is assembled from acquisitions, so consoles, agents and licensing metrics differ between products and the platform story is ahead of the engineering reality.
- They diverge on capability: Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Netwrix covers Change auditing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ona (formerly Gitpod) and Netwrix actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ona (formerly Gitpod) | Netwrix |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by compute unit | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform | Windows, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ephemeral environments
- Agent sessions
- Bring your own cloud
- Devcontainer standard
- Compute unit budgeting
- Enterprise identity
Only in Netwrix
- Change auditing
- Effective permissions
- Data classification
- Access remediation
- Threat detection
- Group policy management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setupnot Netwrix
- Running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptopnot Netwrix
- Keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled accountnot Netwrix
- Reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machinenot Netwrix
Netwrix
- An organisation that cannot tell an auditor who has access to a sensitive file share and needs an answer with evidencenot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- A security team reducing ransomware blast radius by removing Everyone and Domain Users permissions from sensitive datanot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- An IT team investigating an unexplained Active Directory change and needing the exact account, time and previous valuenot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- A company responding to GDPR data subject access requests that must first locate personal data scattered across legacy sharesnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.
- Two disruptive changes of direction inside a year, from development environments to agent orchestration and then from independence to acquisition, mean the product a browser IDE buyer originally chose no longer exists in that form.
- The Gitpod Classic sunset on 15 October 2025 required manual conversion of configuration, hand-moved secrets, self-rescued workspace data and a brand new account, which is the clearest available precedent for how the vendor handles deprecation.
- Community self-hosting is finished: the AGPL-3.0 repository is deprecated by its own README, and self-hosted now means a vendor-operated install in your AWS or GCP account, with no Azure, no on-premises and no air-gapped path.
- Pricing is difficult to model because it runs on a compute unit currency where subscription credits expire at the end of the month, the mapping from units to actual compute is not published on the pricing page, and Enterprise is quotation only.
Netwrix
- The portfolio is assembled from acquisitions, so consoles, agents and licensing metrics differ between products and the platform story is ahead of the engineering reality.
- Licensing metrics vary by product, per enabled user for some and per managed asset for others, which makes assembling a multi-product quote unusually difficult to compare against a single-vendor competitor.
- Auditing agents and collectors add load to domain controllers and file servers, and large estates need careful sizing to avoid degrading the systems being monitored.
- It reports and remediates but does not enforce access decisions at request time, so it complements rather than replaces identity governance and buyers still need an IGA tool for certification workflows.
- Coverage is strongest on Microsoft estates; Linux, NAS appliances and non-Microsoft SaaS are supported unevenly and often need additional modules or trail behind on feature parity.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 parallel environments
- Machines up to 4 vCPU, 16 GB memory and 80 GB disk
- Ona Cloud multi-tenant only
- Core$20/month
- From 20 US dollars a month, up to 100 team members
- Includes 80 to 2,200 recurring compute units a month depending on tier
- Additional units from 10 US dollars per 40 units
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single-tenant deployment in your own AWS or GCP account
- SAML and OIDC single sign-on
- Dedicated account management and forward deployed engineers
Netwrix
On request- Netwrix Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per enabled user or per managed asset depending on the product
- Auditing, data classification, privileged access and threat products licensed separately
- Netwrix 1Secure SaaS console with a 14-day free trial
Which should you pick?
Choose Ona (formerly Gitpod) if
- You need ephemeral environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform.
- You also want agent sessions.
Choose Netwrix if
- You need change auditing.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want effective permissions.
Questions people ask
- Is Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Netwrix better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ona (formerly Gitpod) starts at Free and Netwrix at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Netwrix?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ona (formerly Gitpod) and On request for Netwrix.
- Does Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Netwrix run on more platforms?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform. Netwrix runs on Windows, Web.
- Can I use Ona (formerly Gitpod) for free?
- Yes. Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Netwrix starts at On request.
- What is Ona (formerly Gitpod) best used for?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) is most often used for giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup, running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop, keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled account, reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machine. Of those, giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup and running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop are not what Netwrix is typically brought in for.
- What can Ona (formerly Gitpod) do that Netwrix cannot?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Agent sessions, Bring your own cloud, Devcontainer standard. Netwrix covers Change auditing, Effective permissions, Data classification, Access remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Is Gitpod still called Gitpod?
No. It rebranded to Ona in September 2025, and gitpod.io now redirects to ona.com. The company was acquired by OpenAI in a deal that closed on 10 August 2026.
Netwrix: Does it replace identity governance?
No. It shows you who has access and lets you fix it, but recertification campaigns and access request workflow are an IGA product.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Can I still self-host it for free?
No. The AGPL-3.0 self-hosted project is deprecated by its own README. What is offered now is a vendor-operated single-tenant install in your AWS or GCP account on the Enterprise plan.
Netwrix: Is there a SaaS option?
Netwrix 1Secure is the cloud console covering data and identity visibility, with a 14-day free trial including full access.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What happened to Gitpod Classic?
Pay-as-you-go Classic was switched off on 15 October 2025. Migration required converting gitpod.yml to devcontainer.json, moving secrets by hand, downloading workspace data before the cutoff and creating a new account.
Netwrix: How is it priced?
Per enabled user or per managed asset depending on the product, quoted rather than published. Assume separate line items per module.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What does it cost?
Core starts at 20 US dollars a month and includes a monthly allowance of Ona Compute Units, with more from 10 dollars per 40 units. Subscription credits expire monthly. Enterprise is quoted.
Related pages
More on Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Other head to heads
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Coder
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CodeSandbox
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs StackBlitz
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Namespace
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Daytona
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Earthly
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Nixpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Spacelift
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Atlantis
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Backstage
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs ConfigCat
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Xlinesoft
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs GNU Emacs
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Keil MDK
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Vite
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Bazel
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Omada Identity
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Tenable
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs One Identity
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Securiti
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Saviynt
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Speakeasy
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs BigID
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Doppler
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Fenergo
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Arnica
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Mimecast
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Chainguard
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Envysion
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Feedzai
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Frontegg
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Infisical
- Netwrix vs Coder
- Netwrix vs CodeSandbox
- Netwrix vs StackBlitz
- Netwrix vs Namespace
- Netwrix vs Daytona
- Netwrix vs Earthly
- Netwrix vs Nixpacks
- Netwrix vs Spacelift
- Netwrix vs Atlantis
- Netwrix vs Backstage
- Netwrix vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Netwrix vs ConfigCat
- Netwrix vs Xlinesoft
- Netwrix vs GNU Emacs
- Netwrix vs Keil MDK
- Netwrix vs Vite
- Netwrix vs Bazel
- Netwrix vs Omada Identity
- Netwrix vs Tenable
- Netwrix vs One Identity
- Netwrix vs Securiti
- Netwrix vs Saviynt
- Netwrix vs Speakeasy
- Netwrix vs BigID
- Netwrix vs Doppler
- Netwrix vs Fenergo
- Netwrix vs Arnica
- Netwrix vs Mimecast
- Netwrix vs Chainguard
- Netwrix vs Envysion
- Netwrix vs Feedzai
- Netwrix vs Frontegg
- Netwrix vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Netwrix vs Infisical
