Developer Tools · head to head
Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Jamf Pro

Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Developer Tools
Cloud development environments repositioned as a control plane for software engineering agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Jamf Pro
Cybersecurity
Apple-only device management for Mac, iPhone, iPad and Apple TV, licensed per device by a public US vendor.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ona (formerly Gitpod) acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.; Jamf Pro it manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.
- They diverge on capability: Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Jamf Pro covers Automated Device Enrolment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ona (formerly Gitpod) and Jamf Pro actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ona (formerly Gitpod) | Jamf Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by compute unit | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ephemeral environments
- Agent sessions
- Bring your own cloud
- Devcontainer standard
- Compute unit budgeting
- Enterprise identity
Only in Jamf Pro
- Automated Device Enrolment
- Configuration profiles
- Policies and scripts
- Smart groups
- Self Service
- Patch management
- Extension attributes
- Same-day OS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setupnot Jamf Pro
- Running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptopnot Jamf Pro
- Keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled accountnot Jamf Pro
- Reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machinenot Jamf Pro
Jamf Pro
- An Apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no IT touchnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Education deployments managing shared iPads across classes with per-user app assignmentnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Developer organisations where engineers have administrator rights on their own Macs and management has to be achieved by policy and script rather than lockdownnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Organisations needing compliance evidence for Apple devices that a general-purpose endpoint manager cannot produce at the required depthnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.
- Two disruptive changes of direction inside a year, from development environments to agent orchestration and then from independence to acquisition, mean the product a browser IDE buyer originally chose no longer exists in that form.
- The Gitpod Classic sunset on 15 October 2025 required manual conversion of configuration, hand-moved secrets, self-rescued workspace data and a brand new account, which is the clearest available precedent for how the vendor handles deprecation.
- Community self-hosting is finished: the AGPL-3.0 repository is deprecated by its own README, and self-hosted now means a vendor-operated install in your AWS or GCP account, with no Azure, no on-premises and no air-gapped path.
- Pricing is difficult to model because it runs on a compute unit currency where subscription credits expire at the end of the month, the mapping from units to actual compute is not published on the pricing page, and Enterprise is quotation only.
Jamf Pro
- It manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.
- Licensing is per device per year with different rates for computers and mobile devices, so spare and shared hardware sitting in a cupboard continues to consume licences until somebody actively removes it from inventory, which is nobody's job by default.
- Apple's frameworks set the ceiling: if Apple does not expose a setting through MDM or declarative device management, Jamf cannot manage it either, so requests that are a single Group Policy object on Windows are answered with a scripted workaround or with nothing.
- Zero-touch deployment depends on devices being registered in Apple Business Manager, which generally means buying through Apple or an authorised reseller, so machines bought retail or inherited through an acquisition cannot be supervised without wiping and re-enrolling them.
- Getting value from it requires an Apple platform specialist who can write shell scripts, read configuration profiles and design smart group logic, and a generalist team without that skill uses a fraction of the product while paying the full per-device rate.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 parallel environments
- Machines up to 4 vCPU, 16 GB memory and 80 GB disk
- Ona Cloud multi-tenant only
- Core$20/month
- From 20 US dollars a month, up to 100 team members
- Includes 80 to 2,200 recurring compute units a month depending on tier
- Additional units from 10 US dollars per 40 units
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single-tenant deployment in your own AWS or GCP account
- SAML and OIDC single sign-on
- Dedicated account management and forward deployed engineers
Jamf Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Jamf Pro review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Ona (formerly Gitpod) if
- You need ephemeral environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform.
- You also want agent sessions.
Choose Jamf Pro if
- You need automated device enrolment.
- You also want configuration profiles.
Questions people ask
- Is Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Jamf Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ona (formerly Gitpod) starts at Free and Jamf Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Jamf Pro?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ona (formerly Gitpod) and On request for Jamf Pro.
- Does Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Jamf Pro run on more platforms?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform. Jamf Pro runs on Web.
- Can I use Ona (formerly Gitpod) for free?
- Yes. Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Jamf Pro starts at On request.
- What is Ona (formerly Gitpod) best used for?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) is most often used for giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup, running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop, keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled account, reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machine. Of those, giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup and running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop are not what Jamf Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can Ona (formerly Gitpod) do that Jamf Pro cannot?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Agent sessions, Bring your own cloud, Devcontainer standard. Jamf Pro covers Automated Device Enrolment, Configuration profiles, Policies and scripts, Smart groups.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Is Gitpod still called Gitpod?
No. It rebranded to Ona in September 2025, and gitpod.io now redirects to ona.com. The company was acquired by OpenAI in a deal that closed on 10 August 2026.
Jamf Pro: Does Jamf Pro include endpoint security?
No. Threat prevention, endpoint telemetry and compliance monitoring are Jamf Protect, a separate product and a separate licence. Jamf Connect for identity and password sync is also separate.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Can I still self-host it for free?
No. The AGPL-3.0 self-hosted project is deprecated by its own README. What is offered now is a vendor-operated single-tenant install in your AWS or GCP account on the Enterprise plan.
Jamf Pro: Can it manage Windows or Android?
No. Jamf manages Apple platforms only. A mixed estate needs a second management platform, and that is a deliberate product decision rather than a gap they intend to close.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What happened to Gitpod Classic?
Pay-as-you-go Classic was switched off on 15 October 2025. Migration required converting gitpod.yml to devcontainer.json, moving secrets by hand, downloading workspace data before the cutoff and creating a new account.
Jamf Pro: Do I need Apple Business Manager?
For zero-touch enrolment and volume app licensing, yes. You can enrol devices manually through a user-initiated flow without it, but you lose supervision, automatic enrolment and the ability to prevent a user removing management.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What does it cost?
Core starts at 20 US dollars a month and includes a monthly allowance of Ona Compute Units, with more from 10 dollars per 40 units. Subscription credits expire monthly. Enterprise is quoted.
Jamf Pro: Can I host it myself?
Yes, Jamf Pro can be self-hosted, though Jamf Cloud is the default and receives new capabilities first. Self-hosting means you own the upgrade cadence, which matters because Apple's September releases set the timetable.
Jamf Pro: How does it compare to Microsoft Intune?
Intune manages Apple devices adequately and is often already paid for in an existing Microsoft agreement, which is the argument against Jamf. Jamf is deeper, supports new Apple releases faster, and has the local agent for scripting. Organisations with a few hundred Macs and a strong Apple culture generally choose Jamf; those with a handful of Macs in a Windows estate generally do not.
Related pages
More on Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Other head to heads
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Coder
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CodeSandbox
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs StackBlitz
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Namespace
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Daytona
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Earthly
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Nixpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Spacelift
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Atlantis
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Backstage
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs ConfigCat
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Xlinesoft
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs GNU Emacs
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Keil MDK
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Vite
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Bazel
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs 1Password
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Norton 360
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs LastPass
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Milestone XProtect
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs WireGuard
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Fenergo
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Saviynt
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs IBM QRadar
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Authelia
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Authy
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Baffle
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Beyond Identity
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs BeyondTrust
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Bitdefender VPN
- Jamf Pro vs Coder
- Jamf Pro vs CodeSandbox
- Jamf Pro vs StackBlitz
- Jamf Pro vs Namespace
- Jamf Pro vs Daytona
- Jamf Pro vs Earthly
- Jamf Pro vs Nixpacks
- Jamf Pro vs Spacelift
- Jamf Pro vs Atlantis
- Jamf Pro vs Backstage
- Jamf Pro vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Jamf Pro vs ConfigCat
- Jamf Pro vs Xlinesoft
- Jamf Pro vs GNU Emacs
- Jamf Pro vs Keil MDK
- Jamf Pro vs Vite
- Jamf Pro vs Bazel
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Jamf Pro vs 1Password
- Jamf Pro vs Norton 360
- Jamf Pro vs LastPass
- Jamf Pro vs Milestone XProtect
- Jamf Pro vs WireGuard
- Jamf Pro vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Jamf Pro vs Fenergo
- Jamf Pro vs Saviynt
- Jamf Pro vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Jamf Pro vs IBM QRadar
- Jamf Pro vs Authelia
- Jamf Pro vs Authy
- Jamf Pro vs Baffle
- Jamf Pro vs Beyond Identity
- Jamf Pro vs BeyondTrust
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender VPN
