Developer Tools · head to head
GitLab CI/CD vs Qovery

GitLab CI/CD
Developer Tools
Automatically build, test, deploy, and monitor your applications with GitLab CI/CD
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Qovery
Cloud
Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only GitLab CI/CD has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GitLab CI/CD compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation; Qovery no plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GitLab CI/CD and Qovery actually diverge.
| Attribute | GitLab CI/CD | Qovery |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GitLab CI/CD
Nothing recorded that Qovery does not also cover.
Only in Qovery
- Bring your own cloud
- Preview environments
- Cluster lifecycle
- Terraform provider
- MCP server
- Policy as code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GitLab CI/CD
- Reducing open source project infrastructure costs with public project discountsnot Qovery
- Enforcing monthly CI/CD spending limits and quota notificationsnot Qovery
- Allocating compute minutes to open source contributors affordablynot Qovery
- Forecasting CI/CD spending patterns across multiple projectsnot Qovery
- Providing private runners for cost control without owning infrastructurenot Qovery
Qovery
- A regulated business that must keep application data inside its own AWS account but has nobody to build a deployment platformnot GitLab CI/CD
- Giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining Terraform and Helm by handnot GitLab CI/CD
- Standardising deployment across AWS and GCP when acquisitions have left the organisation on two cloudsnot GitLab CI/CD
- Replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reachnot GitLab CI/CD
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GitLab CI/CD
- Compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Additional compute minutes beyond quota incur charges; exact pricing not specified
Qovery
- No plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- The GPL-3.0 engine and console do not constitute a self-hostable product, because the control plane and API are closed and the self-hosted option is gated behind Enterprise, so the open licence gives you no exit if the company changes direction.
- Qovery provisions managed Kubernetes into your account, which means the cloud bill sits on top of the licence and Qovery initiates control plane and ingress controller upgrades on infrastructure your team is accountable for.
- The company repositioned to agentic infrastructure in June 2026 and now ships a deployment platform, a browser development portal and autonomous coding agents concurrently, so a buyer of the deployment product is not at the centre of the roadmap.
- Team and Business are capped at two and three connected clusters with fixed 4 vCPU CI runners and no single sign-on on Team, which pushes teams of moderate size onto quoted Enterprise pricing earlier than the plan names imply.
Pricing, plan by plan
GitLab CI/CD
Free- FreeFree
- 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces
- Linux x86-64 runners at 1x cost factor
- Premium$null/tiered
- Higher monthly compute minute quotas than free tier
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
- Ultimate$null/tiered
- Highest monthly compute minute allocations
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
Qovery
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 10 users, up to 100 environments, 2 connected clusters
- 5,000 deployment minutes and 7 day audit logs
- Business$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 20 users, up to 250 environments, 3 connected clusters
- 10,000 deployment minutes and 30 day audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom users, environments and clusters
- Self-hosted or air-gapped control plane
- On-premises and bring-your-own-Kubernetes
Which should you pick?
Choose Qovery if
- You need bring your own cloud.
- You work on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- You also want preview environments.
Questions people ask
- Is GitLab CI/CD or Qovery better?
- Neither clearly leads. GitLab CI/CD starts at Free and Qovery at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GitLab CI/CD or Qovery?
- GitLab CI/CD has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GitLab CI/CD and On request for Qovery.
- Does GitLab CI/CD or Qovery run on more platforms?
- GitLab CI/CD runs on Web. Qovery runs on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- Can I use GitLab CI/CD for free?
- Yes. GitLab CI/CD has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qovery starts at On request.
- What is GitLab CI/CD best used for?
- GitLab CI/CD is most often used for reducing open source project infrastructure costs with public project discounts, enforcing monthly ci/cd spending limits and quota notifications, allocating compute minutes to open source contributors affordably, forecasting ci/cd spending patterns across multiple projects. Of those, reducing open source project infrastructure costs with public project discounts and enforcing monthly ci/cd spending limits and quota notifications are not what Qovery is typically brought in for.
- What can GitLab CI/CD do that Qovery cannot?
- Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Preview environments, Cluster lifecycle, Terraform provider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GitLab CI/CD: How many GitLab CI compute minutes does the free tier include?
The free tier of GitLab CI includes 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces on GitLab.com.
SourceQovery: Does Qovery run my applications on its own servers?
No. It provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your AWS, GCP, Azure or Scaleway account, so compute and data stay with your cloud provider and that bill is entirely separate from the Qovery licence.
GitLab CI/CD: What is the cost factor for different GitLab CI runner types?
Linux x86-64 small runners cost 1x; medium runners cost 2x; large runners cost 3x. macOS and Windows runners have cost factors of 6-12x and are in beta status.
SourceQovery: Can I self-host Qovery?
Only on Enterprise. The deployment engine and console are GPL-3.0, but the control plane is closed source and the self-hosted and air-gapped deployments are commercial Enterprise features.
GitLab CI/CD: Do public open-source projects get discounts on GitLab CI compute minutes?
Public open-source projects receive a 0.5x discount on compute minutes. Public forks of GitLab open-source projects receive a 0.008x discount.
SourceQovery: What does it cost?
Qovery does not publish a rate card. Team and Business are billed on usage and quoted through sales, and Enterprise is fully custom. There is a 14 day trial with no card required.
Qovery: What survives if I stop paying?
The Kubernetes cluster and the workloads keep running in your cloud account, but you lose the console, the deployment pipeline, preview environments and every process built on top of them.
Related pages
More on GitLab CI/CD
Other head to heads
- GitLab CI/CD vs Depot
- GitLab CI/CD vs Turborepo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Visual Studio Code
- GitLab CI/CD vs ESLint
- GitLab CI/CD vs pnpm
- GitLab CI/CD vs Buildkite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Tilt
- GitLab CI/CD vs Jitsu
- GitLab CI/CD vs ConfigCat
- GitLab CI/CD vs Octopus Deploy
- GitLab CI/CD vs Rust
- GitLab CI/CD vs Vite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bazel
- GitLab CI/CD vs Daytona
- GitLab CI/CD vs Earthly
- GitLab CI/CD vs Eclipse IDE
- GitLab CI/CD vs Render
- GitLab CI/CD vs Porter
- GitLab CI/CD vs Northflank
- GitLab CI/CD vs CapRover
- GitLab CI/CD vs Coolify
- GitLab CI/CD vs Railway
- GitLab CI/CD vs Dokku
- GitLab CI/CD vs Scaleway
- GitLab CI/CD vs Portworx
- GitLab CI/CD vs Podman
- GitLab CI/CD vs containerd
- GitLab CI/CD vs Encore
- GitLab CI/CD vs Oracle Cloud
- GitLab CI/CD vs Orca Security
- GitLab CI/CD vs Packer
- GitLab CI/CD vs OpenTelemetry
- GitLab CI/CD vs Rook
- Qovery vs Depot
- Qovery vs Turborepo
- Qovery vs Visual Studio Code
- Qovery vs ESLint
- Qovery vs pnpm
- Qovery vs Buildkite
- Qovery vs Tilt
- Qovery vs Jitsu
- Qovery vs ConfigCat
- Qovery vs Octopus Deploy
- Qovery vs Rust
- Qovery vs Vite
- Qovery vs Bazel
- Qovery vs Daytona
- Qovery vs Earthly
- Qovery vs Eclipse IDE
- Qovery vs Render
- Qovery vs Porter
- Qovery vs Northflank
- Qovery vs CapRover
- Qovery vs Coolify
- Qovery vs Railway
- Qovery vs Dokku
- Qovery vs Scaleway
- Qovery vs Portworx
- Qovery vs Podman
- Qovery vs containerd
- Qovery vs Encore
- Qovery vs Oracle Cloud
- Qovery vs Orca Security
- Qovery vs Packer
- Qovery vs OpenTelemetry
- Qovery vs Rook
