Cloud · head to head
Dokku vs GitLab CI/CD

Dokku
Cloud
Single-server platform that accepts a git push and runs Heroku buildpacks on Docker
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

GitLab CI/CD
Developer Tools
Automatically build, test, deploy, and monitor your applications with GitLab CI/CD
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dokku one maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.; GitLab CI/CD compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dokku and GitLab CI/CD actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dokku | GitLab CI/CD |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted | Web |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dokku
- Git push deploy
- Heroku buildpacks
- Datastore plugins
- Automatic certificates
- Zero downtime deploys
- Pluggable schedulers
Only in GitLab CI/CD
Nothing recorded that Dokku does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dokku
- Running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with Heroku style deploymentnot GitLab CI/CD
- Moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic hasnot GitLab CI/CD
- A consultancy that wants buildpack deployments without teaching every client team Kubernetesnot GitLab CI/CD
- Keeping a legacy Procfile application alive on hardware you control after a managed platform deprecates its stacknot GitLab CI/CD
GitLab CI/CD
- Reducing open source project infrastructure costs with public project discountsnot Dokku
- Enforcing monthly CI/CD spending limits and quota notificationsnot Dokku
- Allocating compute minutes to open source contributors affordablynot Dokku
- Forecasting CI/CD spending patterns across multiple projectsnot Dokku
- Providing private runners for cost control without owning infrastructurenot Dokku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dokku
- One maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.
- Dokku Pro asks 849 US dollars for a lifetime licence from a project with no disclosed legal entity behind the promise and no published refund terms, while the product is still described as in development at early bird pricing.
- Dokku is single-server by design, and the k3s scheduler that provides multi-node support is missing log retrieval, process inspection and content-based health checks, with a post-run hook the documentation says does not consistently fire.
- Supported operating systems are limited to Ubuntu 22.04 or 24.04 and Debian 11 or later, so organisations standardised on Red Hat, Rocky or Alma Linux cannot run it on their approved base image.
- Backups are separate commands per datastore plugin that you schedule yourself, with no unified snapshot, no point-in-time recovery and no tested restore path, so verifying that a restore works is entirely your responsibility.
GitLab CI/CD
- Compute minute quotas for Premium and Ultimate tiers not disclosed in documentation
- Additional compute minutes beyond quota incur charges; exact pricing not specified
Pricing, plan by plan
Dokku
Free- DokkuFree
- MIT licensed, no usage limits
- Command line and SSH only
- All datastore and certificate plugins
- Dokku Pro$849/one-time
- Lifetime licence with free upgrades and no subscription
- Covers 1 production and 2 pre-production servers
- Web dashboard and JSON REST API
GitLab CI/CD
Free- FreeFree
- 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces
- Linux x86-64 runners at 1x cost factor
- Premium$null/tiered
- Higher monthly compute minute quotas than free tier
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
- Ultimate$null/tiered
- Highest monthly compute minute allocations
- Additional compute minutes available for purchase
Which should you pick?
Choose Dokku if
- You need git push deploy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want heroku buildpacks.
Questions people ask
- Is Dokku or GitLab CI/CD better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dokku starts at Free and GitLab CI/CD at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dokku or GitLab CI/CD?
- Dokku starts at Free and GitLab CI/CD at Free.
- Does Dokku or GitLab CI/CD run on more platforms?
- Dokku runs on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted. GitLab CI/CD runs on Web.
- Can I use Dokku for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dokku best used for?
- Dokku is most often used for running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with heroku style deployment, moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic has, a consultancy that wants buildpack deployments without teaching every client team kubernetes, keeping a legacy procfile application alive on hardware you control after a managed platform deprecates its stack. Of those, running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with heroku style deployment and moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic has are not what GitLab CI/CD is typically brought in for.
- What can Dokku do that GitLab CI/CD cannot?
- Dokku covers Git push deploy, Heroku buildpacks, Datastore plugins, Automatic certificates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dokku: Is Dokku still maintained?
Yes. Version 0.38.27 shipped in August 2026 with roughly six releases in the preceding two months. The caveat is that one maintainer writes nearly all of it.
GitLab CI/CD: How many GitLab CI compute minutes does the free tier include?
The free tier of GitLab CI includes 400 compute minutes per month for free tier namespaces on GitLab.com.
SourceDokku: What does Dokku Pro give me over the free edition?
A web dashboard, a JSON REST API, git push over HTTPS, browser log tailing, team management and email support from the maintainers. It costs 849 US dollars once for one production and two pre-production servers.
GitLab CI/CD: What is the cost factor for different GitLab CI runner types?
Linux x86-64 small runners cost 1x; medium runners cost 2x; large runners cost 3x. macOS and Windows runners have cost factors of 6-12x and are in beta status.
SourceDokku: Can Dokku run across multiple servers?
Only through the k3s or Nomad schedulers. The k3s path is missing several commands and health check types, and the older Kubernetes scheduler is deprecated and no longer developed.
GitLab CI/CD: Do public open-source projects get discounts on GitLab CI compute minutes?
Public open-source projects receive a 0.5x discount on compute minutes. Public forks of GitLab open-source projects receive a 0.008x discount.
SourceDokku: Will my Heroku application run on it unchanged?
Usually. Dokku runs the same buildpacks and reads a Procfile, so the application layer normally moves across. Add-ons, scaling behaviour and backups are the parts you have to rebuild.
Related pages
More on GitLab CI/CD
Other head to heads
- Dokku vs Fly.io
- Dokku vs Render
- Dokku vs Heroku
- Dokku vs Coolify
- Dokku vs CapRover
- Dokku vs Qovery
- Dokku vs Porter
- Dokku vs Railway
- Dokku vs Northflank
- Dokku vs Podman
- Dokku vs Portworx
- Dokku vs minikube
- Dokku vs Scaleway
- Dokku vs SST
- Dokku vs Tencent Cloud
- Dokku vs Terragrunt
- Dokku vs Skopeo
- Dokku vs Depot
- Dokku vs Turborepo
- Dokku vs Visual Studio Code
- Dokku vs ESLint
- Dokku vs pnpm
- Dokku vs Buildkite
- Dokku vs Tilt
- Dokku vs Jitsu
- Dokku vs ConfigCat
- Dokku vs Octopus Deploy
- Dokku vs Rust
- Dokku vs Vite
- Dokku vs Bazel
- Dokku vs Daytona
- Dokku vs Earthly
- Dokku vs Eclipse IDE
- GitLab CI/CD vs Fly.io
- GitLab CI/CD vs Render
- GitLab CI/CD vs Heroku
- GitLab CI/CD vs Coolify
- GitLab CI/CD vs CapRover
- GitLab CI/CD vs Qovery
- GitLab CI/CD vs Porter
- GitLab CI/CD vs Railway
- GitLab CI/CD vs Northflank
- GitLab CI/CD vs Podman
- GitLab CI/CD vs Portworx
- GitLab CI/CD vs minikube
- GitLab CI/CD vs Scaleway
- GitLab CI/CD vs SST
- GitLab CI/CD vs Tencent Cloud
- GitLab CI/CD vs Terragrunt
- GitLab CI/CD vs Skopeo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Depot
- GitLab CI/CD vs Turborepo
- GitLab CI/CD vs Visual Studio Code
- GitLab CI/CD vs ESLint
- GitLab CI/CD vs pnpm
- GitLab CI/CD vs Buildkite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Tilt
- GitLab CI/CD vs Jitsu
- GitLab CI/CD vs ConfigCat
- GitLab CI/CD vs Octopus Deploy
- GitLab CI/CD vs Rust
- GitLab CI/CD vs Vite
- GitLab CI/CD vs Bazel
- GitLab CI/CD vs Daytona
- GitLab CI/CD vs Earthly
- GitLab CI/CD vs Eclipse IDE
