Testing · head to head
GitHub Actions vs GNAT Pro

GNAT Pro
Developer Tools
Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GitHub Actions has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GitHub Actions private repository usage is capped at 2,000 minutes per month on GitHub Free and 3,000 on Pro and Team, with anything beyond billed; GNAT Pro no pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GitHub Actions and GNAT Pro actually diverge.
| Attribute | GitHub Actions | GNAT Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Testing | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2008 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GitHub Actions
- Running CI builds and tests on pushes and pull requestsnot GNAT Pro
- Automating releases, container image builds and deployments from a repositorynot GNAT Pro
- Scheduled maintenance jobs and repository automationnot GNAT Pro
GNAT Pro
- Building certified avionics software meeting DO-178B/C standardsnot GitHub Actions
- Developing automotive embedded systems with ISO-26262 compliancenot GitHub Actions
- Integrating Ada, C/C++, and Rust components in single codebasenot GitHub Actions
- Managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and SBOMsnot GitHub Actions
- Supporting long-lived software systems spanning decadesnot GitHub Actions
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GitHub Actions
- Private repository usage is capped at 2,000 minutes per month on GitHub Free and 3,000 on Pro and Team, with anything beyond billed
- Artifact storage is only 500 MB on GitHub Free and 2 GB on Team, and it is shared with GitHub Packages storage
- Larger runners are always charged for, even on public repositories and even when plan quota remains
- Windows runners cost $0.010 per minute against $0.006 for a 2-core Linux runner, so the same workflow costs more per platform
- macOS runners are charged at a higher per-minute rate than Linux runners
- Failed runs consume minutes, so a job that fails after 5 minutes and is re-run for 10 uses 15 minutes of quota
- Storage is billed on hourly accrual in GB-Hours, so deleting artifacts stops future charges but does not remove charges already accrued in the cycle
- Cache storage is a separate 10 GB per repository allowance and peak hourly usage above it is charged
- Minutes are charged to the repository owner, not the person who triggered the run, and anyone with write access can trigger runs
- Without a valid payment method on file, workflows are blocked as soon as the quota is exhausted
GNAT Pro
- No pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Vendor indicates per-user, per-year subscription model but does not disclose specific costs
Pricing, plan by plan
GitHub Actions
Free- FreeFree
- 2,000 CI/CD minutes per month
- Free for public repositories
- Team$4/month
- 3,000 CI/CD minutes per month
- Free for public repositories
- First 12 months at promotional rate
- Enterprise$21/month
- 50,000 CI/CD minutes per month
- Free for public repositories
- First 12 months at promotional rate
GNAT Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GNAT Pro review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GNAT Pro if
Nothing in the data separates GNAT Pro from GitHub Actions on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GitHub Actions or GNAT Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. GitHub Actions starts at Free and GNAT Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GitHub Actions or GNAT Pro?
- GitHub Actions has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GitHub Actions and On request for GNAT Pro.
- Does GitHub Actions or GNAT Pro run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use GitHub Actions for free?
- Yes. GitHub Actions has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GNAT Pro starts at On request.
- What is GitHub Actions best used for?
- GitHub Actions is most often used for running ci builds and tests on pushes and pull requests, automating releases, container image builds and deployments from a repository, scheduled maintenance jobs and repository automation. Of those, running ci builds and tests on pushes and pull requests and automating releases, container image builds and deployments from a repository are not what GNAT Pro is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GitHub Actions: How much does GitHub Actions cost?
GitHub Actions is free for public repositories. For private repositories, the Team plan costs $4 per user per month (first 12 months) with 3,000 CI/CD minutes, and the Enterprise plan costs $21 per user per month (first 12 months) with 50,000 CI/CD minutes.
SourceGNAT Pro: How much does GNAT Pro cost?
GNAT Pro pricing is not published on the website. Customers must request a pricing quote by contacting AdaCore directly or speaking with a GNAT Pro expert.
SourceGitHub Actions: Is there a free version of GitHub Actions?
Yes, GitHub Actions is free for all public repositories. The Free plan for private repositories includes 2,000 CI/CD minutes per month. All tiers include free CI/CD minutes for public repository workflows.
SourceGNAT Pro: What is GNAT Pro licensing model?
GNAT Pro is sold on a per-user, per-year basis with no license locks. Customers can request pricing for their specific needs.
SourceGitHub Actions: What does the Team plan add to GitHub Actions?
The Team plan provides 3,000 CI/CD minutes per month compared to 2,000 on the Free plan. It costs $4 per user per month for the first 12 months. Minutes apply only to private repository workflows.
SourceRelated pages
More on GitHub Actions
Other head to heads
- GitHub Actions vs CircleCI
- GitHub Actions vs Insomnia
- GitHub Actions vs BrowserStack
- GitHub Actions vs BugHerd
- GitHub Actions vs Cypress
- GitHub Actions vs Playwright
- GitHub Actions vs Selenium
- GitHub Actions vs Puppeteer
- GitHub Actions vs Vitest
- GitHub Actions vs Zephyr Scale
- GitHub Actions vs Visual Studio Code
- GitHub Actions vs ESLint
- GitHub Actions vs pnpm
- GitHub Actions vs Turborepo
- GitHub Actions vs GitHub Copilot
- GitHub Actions vs Penpot
- GitHub Actions vs Keycloak
- GitHub Actions vs Rust
- GitHub Actions vs CLion
- GitHub Actions vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- GitHub Actions vs GNU Emacs
- GitHub Actions vs Keil MDK
- GitHub Actions vs Vite
- GitHub Actions vs Bazel
- GitHub Actions vs CodeSandbox
- GitHub Actions vs Eclipse IDE
- GitHub Actions vs Moonrepo
- GitHub Actions vs Nx Cloud
- GNAT Pro vs CircleCI
- GNAT Pro vs Insomnia
- GNAT Pro vs BrowserStack
- GNAT Pro vs BugHerd
- GNAT Pro vs Cypress
- GNAT Pro vs Playwright
- GNAT Pro vs Selenium
- GNAT Pro vs Puppeteer
- GNAT Pro vs Vitest
- GNAT Pro vs Zephyr Scale
- GNAT Pro vs Visual Studio Code
- GNAT Pro vs ESLint
- GNAT Pro vs pnpm
- GNAT Pro vs Turborepo
- GNAT Pro vs GitHub Copilot
- GNAT Pro vs Penpot
- GNAT Pro vs Keycloak
- GNAT Pro vs Rust
- GNAT Pro vs CLion
- GNAT Pro vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- GNAT Pro vs GNU Emacs
- GNAT Pro vs Keil MDK
- GNAT Pro vs Vite
- GNAT Pro vs Bazel
- GNAT Pro vs CodeSandbox
- GNAT Pro vs Eclipse IDE
- GNAT Pro vs Moonrepo
- GNAT Pro vs Nx Cloud

