Developer Tools · head to head
Garden vs Vault

Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Garden incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.; Vault vault 1.15.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1, not an OSI open source licence, with IBM Corporation as licensor
- They diverge on capability: Garden covers Action graph, Vault covers Secrets management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Garden and Vault actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
Only in Vault
- Secrets management
- Encryption
- Authentication
- Authorization
- Audit logging
- API access
- High availability
- Replication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Vault
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Vault
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Vault
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Vault
Vault
- Centrally storing and rotating secrets, API keys and database credentialsnot Garden
- Issuing short-lived dynamic credentials to applications instead of static passwordsnot Garden
- Encryption as a service and PKI certificate issuancenot Garden
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely.
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost.
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police.
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice.
Vault
- Vault 1.15.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1, not an OSI open source licence, with IBM Corporation as licensor
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vault to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vault
- Each version only converts to MPL 2.0 four years after that version is published, and the Change Date is tracked per version
- Replication, HSM support, namespaces, performance standby nodes, FIPS builds, control group authorisation, multi-factor authentication, secrets sync and lease count quotas all require a Vault Enterprise licence
- A Vault Enterprise licence must be applied to the cluster before any Enterprise feature can be used
Pricing, plan by plan
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tier$undefined/year
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Vault
Free- Open SourceFree
- Secrets management
- Encryption as a service
- Identity management
- EnterpriseFree
- Advanced features
- Premium support
- Dedicated updates
Which should you pick?
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- You also want shared result caching.
Choose Vault if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- You also want encryption.
Questions people ask
- Is Garden or Vault better?
- Neither clearly leads. Garden starts at Free and Vault at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Garden or Vault?
- Garden starts at Free and Vault at Free.
- Does Garden or Vault run on more platforms?
- Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes. Vault runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- Can I use Garden for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Garden best used for?
- Garden is most often used for a platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loop, an organisation with thirty or more services on kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates production, giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environment, running the identical build and test definition locally and in ci so failures reproduce on a laptop. Of those, a platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loop and an organisation with thirty or more services on kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates production are not what Vault is typically brought in for.
- What can Garden do that Vault cannot?
- Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds. Vault covers Secrets management, Encryption, Authentication, Authorization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Garden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Vault: Is HashiCorp Vault free to use?
Yes, Vault is available as a free, open-source project. The community version includes secrets management, certificate generation and rotation, encryption services, and credential management. Vault Enterprise is a commercial offering with additional features.
SourceGarden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Vault: What are the differences between open-source Vault and Vault Enterprise?
Open-source Vault is free and self-hosted. Vault Enterprise includes additional features and commercial support. HashiCorp also offers Vault Dedicated on the HashiCorp Cloud Platform as a fully managed cloud option.
SourceGarden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Vault: Can I try HashiCorp Cloud Platform Vault without payment?
Yes, HashiCorp offers a free trial option for HCP Vault Dedicated. New users also receive a $500 credit to use across HashiCorp Cloud Platform services.
SourceGarden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Vault: What does Vault manage and protect?
Vault provides identity-based secrets management for users, machines, services, and AI agents. It automates authentication and authorization for access to secrets, passwords, certificates, encryption keys, and other sensitive data across your infrastructure.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Tilt
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Namespace
- Garden vs ConfigCat
- Garden vs OpsLevel
- Garden vs Bazel
- Garden vs Visual Studio
- Garden vs Warp
- Garden vs Xlinesoft
- Garden vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Garden vs GNU Emacs
- Garden vs Keil MDK
- Garden vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Garden vs DigitalOcean
- Garden vs Grafana Cloud
- Garden vs Neon
- Garden vs Crossplane
- Garden vs Microsoft Azure
- Garden vs Podman
- Garden vs Hetzner Cloud
- Garden vs Linode
- Garden vs Vultr
- Garden vs Akamai
- Garden vs Cilium
- Garden vs Contabo
- Garden vs Coolify
- Garden vs Dokku
- Garden vs Buildah
- Garden vs containerd
- Vault vs Okteto
- Vault vs Ansible
- Vault vs Depot
- Vault vs Earthly
- Vault vs Tilt
- Vault vs WarpBuild
- Vault vs Nix
- Vault vs Blacksmith
- Vault vs Namespace
- Vault vs ConfigCat
- Vault vs OpsLevel
- Vault vs Bazel
- Vault vs Visual Studio
- Vault vs Warp
- Vault vs Xlinesoft
- Vault vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Vault vs GNU Emacs
- Vault vs Keil MDK
- Vault vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vault vs DigitalOcean
- Vault vs Grafana Cloud
- Vault vs Neon
- Vault vs Crossplane
- Vault vs Microsoft Azure
- Vault vs Podman
- Vault vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vault vs Linode
- Vault vs Vultr
- Vault vs Akamai
- Vault vs Cilium
- Vault vs Contabo
- Vault vs Coolify
- Vault vs Dokku
- Vault vs Buildah
- Vault vs containerd

