AI · head to head
Galileo vs Zeabur

Galileo
AI
Evaluation and observability platform for GenAI applications and agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Zeabur
Cloud
AI-powered cloud deployment platform for developers
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Galileo the free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- They diverge on capability: Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Zeabur covers AI Agent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Galileo and Zeabur actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Galileo
- Pre-built evaluations
- Ground truth capture
- Luna models
- Agent behavior analysis
- Production guardrails
- Flexible deployment
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Galileo
- Evaluating RAG and agent applications before production releasenot Zeabur
- Monitoring live GenAI applications for failures and driftnot Zeabur
- Applying real-time guardrails without custom integration worknot Zeabur
- Reducing evaluation costs using distilled Luna judge modelsnot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot Galileo
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot Galileo
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot Galileo
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot Galileo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Galileo
- The free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.
- Real-time guardrails and unlimited trace capacity are reserved for the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
- Pro plan pricing scales with trace volume, so costs can grow unpredictably as usage increases.
- On-premises deployment requires an Enterprise contract rather than being available self-serve.
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
Galileo
Free- FreeFree
- 5,000 traces/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited custom evaluations
- Pro$100/month
- 50,000 traces/month
- Standard role-based access control
- Advanced analytics and insights
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Unlimited trace capacity
- Custom rate limits
- Hosted, VPC, or on-prem deployment
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Galileo if
- You need pre-built evaluations.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want ground truth capture.
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Galileo or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Galileo starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Galileo or Zeabur?
- Galileo starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does Galileo or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- Galileo runs on web, api. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Galileo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Galileo best used for?
- Galileo is most often used for evaluating rag and agent applications before production release, monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift, applying real-time guardrails without custom integration work, reducing evaluation costs using distilled luna judge models. Of those, evaluating rag and agent applications before production release and monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can Galileo do that Zeabur cannot?
- Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Ground truth capture, Luna models, Agent behavior analysis. Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Galileo: What does Galileo cost?
Galileo offers a free plan, a Pro plan at $100/month billed yearly (with a 33% annual discount), and a custom-priced Enterprise plan for unlimited trace capacity.
SourceZeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceGalileo: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The Free plan includes 5,000 traces per month with unlimited users and unlimited custom evaluations, aimed at developers and small teams experimenting with GenAI.
SourceZeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceGalileo: How is usage metered?
Galileo's pricing scales based on the number of traces processed each month, with Free capped at 5,000, Pro at 50,000, and Enterprise offering unlimited trace capacity.
SourceZeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Galileo vs Arize AI
- Galileo vs PromptLayer
- Galileo vs Helicone
- Galileo vs Writer
- Galileo vs C3 AI Suite
- Galileo vs Poolside
- Galileo vs Deepgram
- Galileo vs Tabnine
- Galileo vs You.com
- Galileo vs Anthropic API
- Galileo vs AutoGen
- Galileo vs Cartesia
- Galileo vs Verbit
- Galileo vs Wordtune
- Galileo vs Adobe Firefly
- Galileo vs Amazon Q Developer
- Galileo vs Anyword
- Galileo vs Atlas Cloud
- Galileo vs Railway
- Galileo vs Fly.io
- Galileo vs Porter
- Galileo vs Encore
- Galileo vs Vultr
- Galileo vs Hetzner Cloud
- Galileo vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Galileo vs Linode
- Galileo vs Google Cloud Platform
- Galileo vs Microsoft Azure
- Galileo vs Coolify
- Galileo vs Wasabi
- Galileo vs Terragrunt
- Galileo vs Thanos
- Galileo vs Zipkin
- Galileo vs Anyscale
- Galileo vs DeepInfra
- Galileo vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zeabur vs Arize AI
- Zeabur vs PromptLayer
- Zeabur vs Helicone
- Zeabur vs Writer
- Zeabur vs C3 AI Suite
- Zeabur vs Poolside
- Zeabur vs Deepgram
- Zeabur vs Tabnine
- Zeabur vs You.com
- Zeabur vs Anthropic API
- Zeabur vs AutoGen
- Zeabur vs Cartesia
- Zeabur vs Verbit
- Zeabur vs Wordtune
- Zeabur vs Adobe Firefly
- Zeabur vs Amazon Q Developer
- Zeabur vs Anyword
- Zeabur vs Atlas Cloud
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Porter
- Zeabur vs Encore
- Zeabur vs Vultr
- Zeabur vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Linode
- Zeabur vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zeabur vs Microsoft Azure
- Zeabur vs Coolify
- Zeabur vs Wasabi
- Zeabur vs Terragrunt
- Zeabur vs Thanos
- Zeabur vs Zipkin
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs DeepInfra
- Zeabur vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
