Softwr

AI · head to head

Galileo vs TensorBoard

Galileo logo

Galileo

AI

Evaluation and observability platform for GenAI applications and agents

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite
T

TensorBoard

Machine Learning

Local visualisation for training runs, reading event files written to a directory

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Galileo the free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.; TensorBoard there is no authentication of any kind, so putting it on a shared host exposes every run, every metric and every logged sample image to anyone who can reach the port, and adding access control means building and maintaining a reverse proxy.
  • They diverge on capability: Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, TensorBoard covers Scalar dashboards.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Galileo and TensorBoard actually diverge.

Attributes where Galileo and TensorBoard differ
AttributeGalileoTensorBoard
Pricing modelfreemiumopen-source
Platformsweb, apiWeb
CategoryAIMachine Learning

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Galileo

  • Pre-built evaluations
  • Ground truth capture
  • Luna models
  • Agent behavior analysis
  • Production guardrails
  • Flexible deployment

Only in TensorBoard

  • Scalar dashboards
  • Run comparison
  • Graph visualisation
  • Histograms and distributions
  • Embedding projector
  • Image, audio and text panels
  • Hyperparameter view
  • Profiler

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Galileo

  • Evaluating RAG and agent applications before production releasenot TensorBoard
  • Monitoring live GenAI applications for failures and driftnot TensorBoard
  • Applying real-time guardrails without custom integration worknot TensorBoard
  • Reducing evaluation costs using distilled Luna judge modelsnot TensorBoard

TensorBoard

  • Watching a training run in progress on a workstation or a remote box, to decide whether to stop it earlynot Galileo
  • Diagnosing why a model is not learning, by looking at gradient and weight histograms rather than only the loss curvenot Galileo
  • Profiling a slow training loop to find out whether the bottleneck is the data pipeline or the acceleratornot Galileo
  • Working in an environment with no outbound network access, where a hosted tracking service is not an optionnot Galileo

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Galileo

  • The free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.
  • Real-time guardrails and unlimited trace capacity are reserved for the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
  • Pro plan pricing scales with trace volume, so costs can grow unpredictably as usage increases.
  • On-premises deployment requires an Enterprise contract rather than being available self-serve.

TensorBoard

  • There is no authentication of any kind, so putting it on a shared host exposes every run, every metric and every logged sample image to anyone who can reach the port, and adding access control means building and maintaining a reverse proxy.
  • Event files grow without limit and the interface loads runs into memory, so a directory holding hundreds of runs or a script logging scalars every step becomes slow to start and unpleasant to navigate well before the disk fills.
  • It shows only what the training loop chose to write, so nothing connects a curve back to the code commit, the data set version or the environment unless the engineer logged those explicitly, which means the reproducibility problem is left entirely to you.
  • TensorBoard.dev, the hosted service for sharing a run by link, was shut down at the end of 2023, so results now travel between colleagues as screenshots or through a deployment somebody on the team has to operate.
  • Comparing runs is done by ticking boxes in a run list, which is fine for ten runs and useless for a thousand, and that threshold is precisely where teams start paying for MLflow, Weights and Biases or Neptune instead.

Pricing, plan by plan

Galileo

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 5,000 traces/month
    • Unlimited users
    • Unlimited custom evaluations
  • Pro$100/month
    • 50,000 traces/month
    • Standard role-based access control
    • Advanced analytics and insights
  • Enterprise$undefined/mo
    • Unlimited trace capacity
    • Custom rate limits
    • Hosted, VPC, or on-prem deployment

TensorBoard

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the TensorBoard review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Galileo if

  • You need pre-built evaluations.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on web, api.
  • You also want ground truth capture.
Galileo review

Choose TensorBoard if

  • You need scalar dashboards.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want run comparison.
TensorBoard review

Questions people ask

Is Galileo or TensorBoard better?
Neither clearly leads. Galileo starts at Free and TensorBoard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Galileo or TensorBoard?
Galileo starts at Free and TensorBoard at Free.
Does Galileo or TensorBoard run on more platforms?
Galileo runs on web, api. TensorBoard runs on Web.
Can I use Galileo for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Galileo best used for?
Galileo is most often used for evaluating rag and agent applications before production release, monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift, applying real-time guardrails without custom integration work, reducing evaluation costs using distilled luna judge models. Of those, evaluating rag and agent applications before production release and monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift are not what TensorBoard is typically brought in for.
What can Galileo do that TensorBoard cannot?
Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Ground truth capture, Luna models, Agent behavior analysis. TensorBoard covers Scalar dashboards, Run comparison, Graph visualisation, Histograms and distributions.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Galileo: What does Galileo cost?

Galileo offers a free plan, a Pro plan at $100/month billed yearly (with a 33% annual discount), and a custom-priced Enterprise plan for unlimited trace capacity.

Source
TensorBoard: Does it work with PyTorch?

Yes. PyTorch includes a SummaryWriter that emits the same event file format, and Lightning wires it up by default. Nothing about the tool requires TensorFlow at run time.

Galileo: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?

The Free plan includes 5,000 traces per month with unlimited users and unlimited custom evaluations, aimed at developers and small teams experimenting with GenAI.

Source
TensorBoard: Do I have to install TensorFlow to use it?

No. The tensorboard package installs on its own. Some plugins expect TensorFlow to be present, but the scalar, histogram and image dashboards do not.

Galileo: How is usage metered?

Galileo's pricing scales based on the number of traces processed each month, with Free capped at 5,000, Pro at 50,000, and Enterprise offering unlimited trace capacity.

Source
TensorBoard: Is it an experiment tracker?

No, and treating it as one is the common mistake. It visualises whatever a run wrote to disk. It does not store hyperparameters, code versions, artefacts or results in a way that survives someone deleting the log directory.

TensorBoard: How do I share a dashboard with a colleague?

Host it yourself behind your own authentication, or send screenshots. The hosted sharing service was retired at the end of 2023.

TensorBoard: What does it cost?

Nothing. It is Apache 2.0 licensed and runs on your own machine.

Share

Related pages

More on Galileo

More on TensorBoard

Keep looking

Other head to heads