AI · head to head
Galileo vs Qovery

Galileo
AI
Evaluation and observability platform for GenAI applications and agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Qovery
Cloud
Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Galileo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Galileo the free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.; Qovery no plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- They diverge on capability: Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Qovery covers Bring your own cloud.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Galileo and Qovery actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Galileo
- Pre-built evaluations
- Ground truth capture
- Luna models
- Agent behavior analysis
- Production guardrails
- Flexible deployment
Only in Qovery
- Bring your own cloud
- Preview environments
- Cluster lifecycle
- Terraform provider
- MCP server
- Policy as code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Galileo
- Evaluating RAG and agent applications before production releasenot Qovery
- Monitoring live GenAI applications for failures and driftnot Qovery
- Applying real-time guardrails without custom integration worknot Qovery
- Reducing evaluation costs using distilled Luna judge modelsnot Qovery
Qovery
- A regulated business that must keep application data inside its own AWS account but has nobody to build a deployment platformnot Galileo
- Giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining Terraform and Helm by handnot Galileo
- Standardising deployment across AWS and GCP when acquisitions have left the organisation on two cloudsnot Galileo
- Replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reachnot Galileo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Galileo
- The free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.
- Real-time guardrails and unlimited trace capacity are reserved for the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
- Pro plan pricing scales with trace volume, so costs can grow unpredictably as usage increases.
- On-premises deployment requires an Enterprise contract rather than being available self-serve.
Qovery
- No plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- The GPL-3.0 engine and console do not constitute a self-hostable product, because the control plane and API are closed and the self-hosted option is gated behind Enterprise, so the open licence gives you no exit if the company changes direction.
- Qovery provisions managed Kubernetes into your account, which means the cloud bill sits on top of the licence and Qovery initiates control plane and ingress controller upgrades on infrastructure your team is accountable for.
- The company repositioned to agentic infrastructure in June 2026 and now ships a deployment platform, a browser development portal and autonomous coding agents concurrently, so a buyer of the deployment product is not at the centre of the roadmap.
- Team and Business are capped at two and three connected clusters with fixed 4 vCPU CI runners and no single sign-on on Team, which pushes teams of moderate size onto quoted Enterprise pricing earlier than the plan names imply.
Pricing, plan by plan
Galileo
Free- FreeFree
- 5,000 traces/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited custom evaluations
- Pro$100/month
- 50,000 traces/month
- Standard role-based access control
- Advanced analytics and insights
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Unlimited trace capacity
- Custom rate limits
- Hosted, VPC, or on-prem deployment
Qovery
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 10 users, up to 100 environments, 2 connected clusters
- 5,000 deployment minutes and 7 day audit logs
- Business$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 20 users, up to 250 environments, 3 connected clusters
- 10,000 deployment minutes and 30 day audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom users, environments and clusters
- Self-hosted or air-gapped control plane
- On-premises and bring-your-own-Kubernetes
Which should you pick?
Choose Galileo if
- You need pre-built evaluations.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want ground truth capture.
Choose Qovery if
- You need bring your own cloud.
- You work on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- You also want preview environments.
Questions people ask
- Is Galileo or Qovery better?
- Neither clearly leads. Galileo starts at Free and Qovery at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Galileo or Qovery?
- Galileo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Galileo and On request for Qovery.
- Does Galileo or Qovery run on more platforms?
- Galileo runs on web, api. Qovery runs on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Galileo for free?
- Yes. Galileo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qovery starts at On request.
- What is Galileo best used for?
- Galileo is most often used for evaluating rag and agent applications before production release, monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift, applying real-time guardrails without custom integration work, reducing evaluation costs using distilled luna judge models. Of those, evaluating rag and agent applications before production release and monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift are not what Qovery is typically brought in for.
- What can Galileo do that Qovery cannot?
- Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Ground truth capture, Luna models, Agent behavior analysis. Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Preview environments, Cluster lifecycle, Terraform provider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Galileo: What does Galileo cost?
Galileo offers a free plan, a Pro plan at $100/month billed yearly (with a 33% annual discount), and a custom-priced Enterprise plan for unlimited trace capacity.
SourceQovery: Does Qovery run my applications on its own servers?
No. It provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your AWS, GCP, Azure or Scaleway account, so compute and data stay with your cloud provider and that bill is entirely separate from the Qovery licence.
Galileo: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The Free plan includes 5,000 traces per month with unlimited users and unlimited custom evaluations, aimed at developers and small teams experimenting with GenAI.
SourceQovery: Can I self-host Qovery?
Only on Enterprise. The deployment engine and console are GPL-3.0, but the control plane is closed source and the self-hosted and air-gapped deployments are commercial Enterprise features.
Galileo: How is usage metered?
Galileo's pricing scales based on the number of traces processed each month, with Free capped at 5,000, Pro at 50,000, and Enterprise offering unlimited trace capacity.
SourceQovery: What does it cost?
Qovery does not publish a rate card. Team and Business are billed on usage and quoted through sales, and Enterprise is fully custom. There is a 14 day trial with no card required.
Qovery: What survives if I stop paying?
The Kubernetes cluster and the workloads keep running in your cloud account, but you lose the console, the deployment pipeline, preview environments and every process built on top of them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Galileo vs Arize AI
- Galileo vs PromptLayer
- Galileo vs Helicone
- Galileo vs Writer
- Galileo vs C3 AI Suite
- Galileo vs Poolside
- Galileo vs Deepgram
- Galileo vs Tabnine
- Galileo vs You.com
- Galileo vs Anthropic API
- Galileo vs AutoGen
- Galileo vs Cartesia
- Galileo vs Verbit
- Galileo vs Wordtune
- Galileo vs Adobe Firefly
- Galileo vs Amazon Q Developer
- Galileo vs Anyword
- Galileo vs Atlas Cloud
- Galileo vs Render
- Galileo vs Porter
- Galileo vs Northflank
- Galileo vs CapRover
- Galileo vs Coolify
- Galileo vs Railway
- Galileo vs Dokku
- Galileo vs Scaleway
- Galileo vs Portworx
- Galileo vs Podman
- Galileo vs containerd
- Galileo vs Encore
- Galileo vs Oracle Cloud
- Galileo vs Orca Security
- Galileo vs Packer
- Galileo vs OpenTelemetry
- Galileo vs Rook
- Qovery vs Arize AI
- Qovery vs PromptLayer
- Qovery vs Helicone
- Qovery vs Writer
- Qovery vs C3 AI Suite
- Qovery vs Poolside
- Qovery vs Deepgram
- Qovery vs Tabnine
- Qovery vs You.com
- Qovery vs Anthropic API
- Qovery vs AutoGen
- Qovery vs Cartesia
- Qovery vs Verbit
- Qovery vs Wordtune
- Qovery vs Adobe Firefly
- Qovery vs Amazon Q Developer
- Qovery vs Anyword
- Qovery vs Atlas Cloud
- Qovery vs Render
- Qovery vs Porter
- Qovery vs Northflank
- Qovery vs CapRover
- Qovery vs Coolify
- Qovery vs Railway
- Qovery vs Dokku
- Qovery vs Scaleway
- Qovery vs Portworx
- Qovery vs Podman
- Qovery vs containerd
- Qovery vs Encore
- Qovery vs Oracle Cloud
- Qovery vs Orca Security
- Qovery vs Packer
- Qovery vs OpenTelemetry
- Qovery vs Rook
