AI · head to head
Galileo vs Milvus

Galileo
AI
Evaluation and observability platform for GenAI applications and agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Milvus
Machine Learning
Open-source vector database for scalable similarity search
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Galileo the free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.; Milvus vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- They diverge on capability: Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Galileo and Milvus actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Galileo
- Pre-built evaluations
- Ground truth capture
- Luna models
- Agent behavior analysis
- Production guardrails
- Flexible deployment
Only in Milvus
- Billion-scale vectors
- Multiple index types
- GPU acceleration
- Hybrid search
- Data partitioning
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- Hugging Face
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Galileo
- Evaluating RAG and agent applications before production releasenot Milvus
- Monitoring live GenAI applications for failures and driftnot Milvus
- Applying real-time guardrails without custom integration worknot Milvus
- Reducing evaluation costs using distilled Luna judge modelsnot Milvus
Milvus
- Self hosting a vector database for semantic searchnot Galileo
- Storing and querying embeddings for retrieval augmented generationnot Galileo
- Similarity search over images, audio or text at scalenot Galileo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Galileo
- The free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.
- Real-time guardrails and unlimited trace capacity are reserved for the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
- Pro plan pricing scales with trace volume, so costs can grow unpredictably as usage increases.
- On-premises deployment requires an Enterprise contract rather than being available self-serve.
Milvus
- Vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- A collection is limited to 64 fields, 1,024 partitions and 16 shards
- Only 1 index is allowed per field
- Search returns at most 16,384 vectors as top-k, and nq is capped at 16,384
- Input and output per RPC is capped at 64 MB for insert, search and query
- VARCHAR values are limited to 65,535 characters
- Data loaded into query nodes cannot exceed 90% of available memory
- An instance supports at most 65,536 collections
Pricing, plan by plan
Galileo
Free- FreeFree
- 5,000 traces/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited custom evaluations
- Pro$100/month
- 50,000 traces/month
- Standard role-based access control
- Advanced analytics and insights
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Unlimited trace capacity
- Custom rate limits
- Hosted, VPC, or on-prem deployment
Milvus
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full features
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- Zilliz CloudFree
- Managed service
- Free tier available
Which should you pick?
Choose Galileo if
- You need pre-built evaluations.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want ground truth capture.
Choose Milvus if
- You need billion-scale vectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- You also want multiple index types.
Questions people ask
- Is Galileo or Milvus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Galileo starts at Free and Milvus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Galileo or Milvus?
- Galileo starts at Free and Milvus at Free.
- Does Galileo or Milvus run on more platforms?
- Galileo runs on web, api. Milvus runs on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Galileo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Galileo best used for?
- Galileo is most often used for evaluating rag and agent applications before production release, monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift, applying real-time guardrails without custom integration work, reducing evaluation costs using distilled luna judge models. Of those, evaluating rag and agent applications before production release and monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift are not what Milvus is typically brought in for.
- What can Galileo do that Milvus cannot?
- Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Ground truth capture, Luna models, Agent behavior analysis. Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors, Multiple index types, GPU acceleration, Hybrid search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Galileo: What does Galileo cost?
Galileo offers a free plan, a Pro plan at $100/month billed yearly (with a 33% annual discount), and a custom-priced Enterprise plan for unlimited trace capacity.
SourceMilvus: How much does Milvus cost?
Milvus is open-source and free to use and modify. The self-hosted version has no licensing cost. Zilliz Cloud (the managed SaaS version) does not publish pricing on the website.
SourceGalileo: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The Free plan includes 5,000 traces per month with unlimited users and unlimited custom evaluations, aimed at developers and small teams experimenting with GenAI.
SourceMilvus: Is there a free or open-source version of Milvus?
Yes, Milvus is fully open-source and available for free. Milvus Lite is a lightweight option for learning and prototyping that can be installed via pip.
SourceGalileo: How is usage metered?
Galileo's pricing scales based on the number of traces processed each month, with Free capped at 5,000, Pro at 50,000, and Enterprise offering unlimited trace capacity.
SourceMilvus: Does Milvus offer a managed cloud service?
Yes, Zilliz Cloud is a fully managed Milvus cloud offering with serverless and dedicated cluster options. Pricing must be requested from the company as it is not listed on the public website.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Galileo vs Arize AI
- Galileo vs PromptLayer
- Galileo vs Helicone
- Galileo vs Writer
- Galileo vs C3 AI Suite
- Galileo vs Poolside
- Galileo vs Deepgram
- Galileo vs Tabnine
- Galileo vs You.com
- Galileo vs Anthropic API
- Galileo vs AutoGen
- Galileo vs Cartesia
- Galileo vs Verbit
- Galileo vs Wordtune
- Galileo vs Adobe Firefly
- Galileo vs Amazon Q Developer
- Galileo vs Anyword
- Galileo vs Atlas Cloud
- Galileo vs Google Vertex AI
- Galileo vs AWS SageMaker
- Galileo vs Azure Machine Learning
- Galileo vs DataRobot
- Galileo vs Pinecone
- Galileo vs Weaviate
- Galileo vs Ray
- Galileo vs Fal AI
- Galileo vs Jupyter
- Galileo vs Keras
- Galileo vs LangChain
- Galileo vs H2O.ai
- Galileo vs Hugging Face
- Galileo vs Kubeflow
- Galileo vs Langwatch
- Galileo vs LlamaIndex
- Galileo vs Semantic Kernel
- Milvus vs Arize AI
- Milvus vs PromptLayer
- Milvus vs Helicone
- Milvus vs Writer
- Milvus vs C3 AI Suite
- Milvus vs Poolside
- Milvus vs Deepgram
- Milvus vs Tabnine
- Milvus vs You.com
- Milvus vs Anthropic API
- Milvus vs AutoGen
- Milvus vs Cartesia
- Milvus vs Verbit
- Milvus vs Wordtune
- Milvus vs Adobe Firefly
- Milvus vs Amazon Q Developer
- Milvus vs Anyword
- Milvus vs Atlas Cloud
- Milvus vs Google Vertex AI
- Milvus vs AWS SageMaker
- Milvus vs Azure Machine Learning
- Milvus vs DataRobot
- Milvus vs Pinecone
- Milvus vs Weaviate
- Milvus vs Ray
- Milvus vs Fal AI
- Milvus vs Jupyter
- Milvus vs Keras
- Milvus vs LangChain
- Milvus vs H2O.ai
- Milvus vs Hugging Face
- Milvus vs Kubeflow
- Milvus vs Langwatch
- Milvus vs LlamaIndex
- Milvus vs Semantic Kernel
