Software · head to head
Front vs Lark

Front
Software
Where teams collaborate on customer communication
- From
- $25/month per seat
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Lark has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Front starter tier limited to single-channel support; omnichannel support requires Professional tier; Lark lark's own pricing page description states it offers a free starter pack, a Pro plan, and an Enterprise plan, and directs buyers to Contact us rather than publishing Pro/Enterprise figures on the rendered page.
- They diverge on capability: Front covers Shared inbox, Lark covers Team messaging.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Front and Lark actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Front
- Shared inbox
- Email collaboration
- Omnichannel messaging
- Analytics
- Workflows
- Integrations
- HubSpot
- Slack
Only in Lark
- Team messaging
- Video conferencing
- Collaborative docs
- Cloud storage
- Calendar
- GitHub
- Google Workspace
- Open API
Both cover
- Salesforce
- Jira
- SOC2
- Web support
- Ios support
- Android support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Front
- Multi-team customer support across email, chat, SMS channelsnot Lark
- Enterprises using AI to resolve complex multi-step customer requestsnot Lark
Lark
- Team communicationnot Front
- Document collaborationnot Front
- Project managementnot Front
- Company intranetnot Front
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Front
- Starter tier limited to single-channel support; omnichannel support requires Professional tier
- AI Copilot, Smart QA, and Smart CSAT are included only in Enterprise tier ($105/seat/month); available as add-ons at higher cost in lower tiers
- Starter tier limited to 10 automation rules; Professional tier allows 20; unlimited rules only in Enterprise
- Advanced analytics excluded from Starter tier
Lark
- Lark's own pricing page description states it offers a free starter pack, a Pro plan, and an Enterprise plan, and directs buyers to Contact us rather than publishing Pro/Enterprise figures on the rendered page.
Pricing, plan by plan
Front
$25/month per seatNo published plan breakdown. See the Front review.
Lark
Free- StarterFree
- Up to 50 users
- 100GB storage
- Unlimited messaging
- Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users
- 1TB storage per user
- 24-hour meetings
- Enterprise$20/month
- SSO/SAML
- eDiscovery
- Custom retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Front if
- You need shared inbox.
- You work on Cloud-based SaaS.
- You also want email collaboration.
Choose Lark if
- You need team messaging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android.
- You also want video conferencing.
Questions people ask
- Is Front or Lark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Front starts at $25/month per seat and Lark at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Front or Lark?
- Lark has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $25/month per seat for Front and Free for Lark.
- Does Front or Lark run on more platforms?
- Front runs on Cloud-based SaaS. Lark runs on Web, Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Lark for free?
- Yes. Lark has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Front starts at $25/month per seat.
- What is Front best used for?
- Front is most often used for multi-team customer support across email, chat, sms channels, enterprises using ai to resolve complex multi-step customer requests. Of those, multi-team customer support across email, chat, sms channels and enterprises using ai to resolve complex multi-step customer requests are not what Lark is typically brought in for.
- What can Front do that Lark cannot?
- Front covers Shared inbox, Email collaboration, Omnichannel messaging, Analytics. Lark covers Team messaging, Video conferencing, Collaborative docs, Cloud storage. Both handle Salesforce, Jira, SOC2, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Front vs Kustomer
- Front vs Groove
- Front vs Freshdesk
- Front vs Freshworks Customer Service Suite
- Front vs Jira Service Management
- Front vs Salesforce Service Cloud
- Front vs Zendesk
- Front vs 8x8 Contact Center
- Front vs Amazon Connect
- Front vs BMC Helix
- Front vs Chatwoot
- Front vs Customerly
- Front vs DelightChat
- Front vs Dialpad Contact Center
- Front vs Dixa
- Front vs Freshservice
- Front vs Gladly
- Front vs HappyFox
- Front vs Zoom
- Front vs Microsoft Teams
- Front vs Loom
- Front vs RingCentral Video
- Front vs Slack
- Front vs Telegram
- Front vs Webex by Cisco
- Front vs Chanty
- Front vs Chatwork
- Front vs Flock
- Front vs Google Chat
- Front vs Grasshopper
- Front vs Mattermost
- Front vs Quo
- Front vs Rocket.Chat
- Front vs Signal
- Front vs TeamViewer
- Front vs Textline
- Lark vs Kustomer
- Lark vs Groove
- Lark vs Freshdesk
- Lark vs Freshworks Customer Service Suite
- Lark vs Jira Service Management
- Lark vs Salesforce Service Cloud
- Lark vs Zendesk
- Lark vs 8x8 Contact Center
- Lark vs Amazon Connect
- Lark vs BMC Helix
- Lark vs Chatwoot
- Lark vs Customerly
- Lark vs DelightChat
- Lark vs Dialpad Contact Center
- Lark vs Dixa
- Lark vs Freshservice
- Lark vs Gladly
- Lark vs HappyFox
- Lark vs Zoom
- Lark vs Microsoft Teams
- Lark vs Loom
- Lark vs RingCentral Video
- Lark vs Slack
- Lark vs Telegram
- Lark vs Webex by Cisco
- Lark vs Chanty
- Lark vs Chatwork
- Lark vs Flock
- Lark vs Google Chat
- Lark vs Grasshopper
- Lark vs Mattermost
- Lark vs Quo
- Lark vs Rocket.Chat
- Lark vs Signal
- Lark vs TeamViewer
- Lark vs Textline

