Utilities · head to head
FreeFileSync vs Hazel

FreeFileSync
Utilities
Open-source folder comparison and synchronisation
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Hazel
Utilities
Rule-based file organisation for macOS that watches folders and automatically files, renames or deletes
- From
- $42/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only FreeFileSync has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: FreeFileSync the interface is dense and functional rather than friendly, and the sync direction is easy to misread; Hazel there is no free tier, only a 14-day trial, so the full 42 dollar cost is a real barrier for a casual user just wanting one simple rule.
- They diverge on capability: FreeFileSync covers Comparison before sync, Hazel covers Folder watching.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FreeFileSync and Hazel actually diverge.
| Attribute | FreeFileSync | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $42/one-time |
| Pricing model | Free and open source; a paid Donation Edition adds convenience features | One-time purchase |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Mac |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Utilities).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FreeFileSync
- Comparison before sync
- Multiple sync modes
- Versioning
- Batch jobs
Only in Hazel
- Folder watching
- Conditional actions
- Content-based matching
- Duplicate detection
- Trash auto-empty
- App Sweep
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FreeFileSync
- Mirroring a working drive to external storage on a schedulenot Hazel
- Comparing two folders to find what actually differsnot Hazel
- Backup routines where seeing the plan before it runs mattersnot Hazel
Hazel
- A freelancer who wants invoices and receipts auto-filed into client folders based on the text inside themnot FreeFileSync
- Anyone whose Downloads folder becomes unmanageable and wants files auto-sorted by type or agenot FreeFileSync
- A photographer who wants imported files renamed by date pattern and moved to a project folder automaticallynot FreeFileSync
- A user who wants old files in a scratch folder auto-deleted after a set number of days without remembering to clear it manuallynot FreeFileSync
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FreeFileSync
- The interface is dense and functional rather than friendly, and the sync direction is easy to misread
- Some convenience features are held behind the paid Donation Edition
- The installer has historically bundled optional offers, which is worth reading carefully during setup
- Not a versioned cloud backup: it synchronises what you point it at and nothing more
Hazel
- There is no free tier, only a 14-day trial, so the full 42 dollar cost is a real barrier for a casual user just wanting one simple rule.
- Rules are entirely hand-built, so the tool provides no value until a user invests time writing and testing conditions.
- A misconfigured rule can silently move, rename or delete the wrong files, and mistakes are only obvious after the fact unless tested carefully first.
- It is Mac only, so it does nothing for a Windows machine sharing the same file workflow.
- It focuses purely on file automation, so a user also wanting window management, clipboard history or gesture control needs entirely separate tools.
Pricing, plan by plan
FreeFileSync
Free- FreeFree
- Core functionality
- Personal use
Hazel
$42/one-time- Single User Licence$42/one-time
- One user, Hazel 6
- Free updates within the major version
- 14-day free trial before purchase
- Family Pack$65/one-time
- Multiple users covered under one purchase
- Same feature set as the single licence
Which should you pick?
Choose FreeFileSync if
- You need comparison before sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want multiple sync modes.
Choose Hazel if
- You need folder watching.
- You work on Mac.
- You also want conditional actions.
Questions people ask
- Is FreeFileSync or Hazel better?
- Neither clearly leads. FreeFileSync starts at Free and Hazel at $42/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FreeFileSync or Hazel?
- FreeFileSync has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for FreeFileSync and $42/one-time for Hazel.
- Does FreeFileSync or Hazel run on more platforms?
- FreeFileSync runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Hazel runs on Mac.
- Can I use FreeFileSync for free?
- Yes. FreeFileSync has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Hazel starts at $42/one-time.
- What is FreeFileSync best used for?
- FreeFileSync is most often used for mirroring a working drive to external storage on a schedule, comparing two folders to find what actually differs, backup routines where seeing the plan before it runs matters. Of those, mirroring a working drive to external storage on a schedule and comparing two folders to find what actually differs are not what Hazel is typically brought in for.
- What can FreeFileSync do that Hazel cannot?
- FreeFileSync covers Comparison before sync, Multiple sync modes, Versioning, Batch jobs. Hazel covers Folder watching, Conditional actions, Content-based matching, Duplicate detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FreeFileSync: Is FreeFileSync free?
Yes, open source and free. A paid Donation Edition adds convenience features such as parallel sync and portable installs.
Hazel: Is Hazel a subscription?
No. It is a one-time purchase per major version, currently 42 US dollars for a single user licence.
FreeFileSync: Is it a backup tool?
It synchronises folders and supports versioning, which covers many backup needs, but it is not a managed cloud backup service.
Hazel: Can Hazel read the content of files, not just names?
Yes, rules can match on text found inside supported file types such as PDFs and text documents.
FreeFileSync: Can it sync to cloud storage?
Yes, including Google Drive and SFTP or FTP targets alongside local and network paths.
Hazel: Does Hazel run in the background automatically?
Yes, it watches configured folders continuously and applies rules as files change, with no manual trigger needed.
Related pages
More on FreeFileSync
Other head to heads
- FreeFileSync vs Syncthing
- FreeFileSync vs Rclone
- FreeFileSync vs CrystalDiskInfo
- FreeFileSync vs PeaZip
- FreeFileSync vs GParted
- FreeFileSync vs CCleaner
- FreeFileSync vs balenaEtcher
- FreeFileSync vs Rufus
- FreeFileSync vs Everything
- FreeFileSync vs Karabiner-Elements
- FreeFileSync vs Maccy
- FreeFileSync vs Paste
- FreeFileSync vs Transmission
- FreeFileSync vs Find My
- FreeFileSync vs Magnet
- FreeFileSync vs Sedaru
- FreeFileSync vs BetterTouchTool
- FreeFileSync vs CleanShot X
- FreeFileSync vs Shottr
- FreeFileSync vs Rectangle
- FreeFileSync vs Kap
- FreeFileSync vs Calsense
- FreeFileSync vs WizTree
- FreeFileSync vs Yelp
- FreeFileSync vs Dominos
- Hazel vs Syncthing
- Hazel vs Rclone
- Hazel vs CrystalDiskInfo
- Hazel vs PeaZip
- Hazel vs GParted
- Hazel vs CCleaner
- Hazel vs balenaEtcher
- Hazel vs Rufus
- Hazel vs Everything
- Hazel vs Karabiner-Elements
- Hazel vs Maccy
- Hazel vs Paste
- Hazel vs Transmission
- Hazel vs Find My
- Hazel vs Magnet
- Hazel vs Sedaru
- Hazel vs BetterTouchTool
- Hazel vs CleanShot X
- Hazel vs Shottr
- Hazel vs Rectangle
- Hazel vs Kap
- Hazel vs Calsense
- Hazel vs WizTree
- Hazel vs Yelp
- Hazel vs Dominos
