Utilities · head to head
Hazel vs Kap

Hazel
Utilities
Rule-based file organisation for macOS that watches folders and automatically files, renames or deletes
- From
- $42/one-time
- Rated
- -

Kap
Utilities
Free open source screen recorder for macOS, focused on video and GIF capture rather than annotation
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kap has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Hazel there is no free tier, only a 14-day trial, so the full 42 dollar cost is a real barrier for a casual user just wanting one simple rule.; Kap it has no annotation tools at all, so any still-image markup work needs a separate app such as Shottr or CleanShot X.
- They diverge on capability: Hazel covers Folder watching, Kap covers Multi-format export.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hazel and Kap actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Mac), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Utilities).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hazel
- Folder watching
- Conditional actions
- Content-based matching
- Duplicate detection
- Trash auto-empty
- App Sweep
Only in Kap
- Multi-format export
- Area, window or display capture
- Plugin system
- Basic trimming
- Menu bar operation
- Open source
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hazel
- A freelancer who wants invoices and receipts auto-filed into client folders based on the text inside themnot Kap
- Anyone whose Downloads folder becomes unmanageable and wants files auto-sorted by type or agenot Kap
- A photographer who wants imported files renamed by date pattern and moved to a project folder automaticallynot Kap
- A user who wants old files in a scratch folder auto-deleted after a set number of days without remembering to clear it manuallynot Kap
Kap
- A developer recording a demo GIF for a README or documentation pagenot Hazel
- A marketer capturing a quick product walkthrough clip without buying screen recording softwarenot Hazel
- Someone creating App Store style device-framed screenshots for a listingnot Hazel
- A user who only needs video capture and does not want to pay for a suite of annotation features they will not usenot Hazel
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hazel
- There is no free tier, only a 14-day trial, so the full 42 dollar cost is a real barrier for a casual user just wanting one simple rule.
- Rules are entirely hand-built, so the tool provides no value until a user invests time writing and testing conditions.
- A misconfigured rule can silently move, rename or delete the wrong files, and mistakes are only obvious after the fact unless tested carefully first.
- It is Mac only, so it does nothing for a Windows machine sharing the same file workflow.
- It focuses purely on file automation, so a user also wanting window management, clipboard history or gesture control needs entirely separate tools.
Kap
- It has no annotation tools at all, so any still-image markup work needs a separate app such as Shottr or CleanShot X.
- There is no scrolling capture or OCR, features both Shottr and CleanShot X include.
- Editing is limited to basic trimming, so anything beyond a simple cut needs a dedicated video editor afterward.
- It is Mac only, offering nothing for screen recording needs on Windows.
- As a volunteer-maintained open source project, updates and bug fixes depend on community contribution rather than a company with paid support obligations.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hazel
$42/one-time- Single User Licence$42/one-time
- One user, Hazel 6
- Free updates within the major version
- 14-day free trial before purchase
- Family Pack$65/one-time
- Multiple users covered under one purchase
- Same feature set as the single licence
Kap
Free- KapFree
- Free and open source under the MIT licence
- MP4, WebM, GIF and device frame export
- Plugin system for extended workflows
Which should you pick?
Choose Hazel if
- You need folder watching.
- You work on Mac.
- You also want conditional actions.
Choose Kap if
- You need multi-format export.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Mac.
- You also want area, window or display capture.
Questions people ask
- Is Hazel or Kap better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hazel starts at $42/one-time and Kap at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hazel or Kap?
- Kap has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $42/one-time for Hazel and Free for Kap.
- Does Hazel or Kap run on more platforms?
- Both run on Mac, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Kap for free?
- Yes. Kap has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Hazel starts at $42/one-time.
- What is Hazel best used for?
- Hazel is most often used for a freelancer who wants invoices and receipts auto-filed into client folders based on the text inside them, anyone whose downloads folder becomes unmanageable and wants files auto-sorted by type or age, a photographer who wants imported files renamed by date pattern and moved to a project folder automatically, a user who wants old files in a scratch folder auto-deleted after a set number of days without remembering to clear it manually. Of those, a freelancer who wants invoices and receipts auto-filed into client folders based on the text inside them and anyone whose downloads folder becomes unmanageable and wants files auto-sorted by type or age are not what Kap is typically brought in for.
- What can Hazel do that Kap cannot?
- Hazel covers Folder watching, Conditional actions, Content-based matching, Duplicate detection. Kap covers Multi-format export, Area, window or display capture, Plugin system, Basic trimming.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hazel: Is Hazel a subscription?
No. It is a one-time purchase per major version, currently 42 US dollars for a single user licence.
Kap: Is Kap free?
Yes, entirely. It is open source under the MIT licence with no paid tier.
Hazel: Can Hazel read the content of files, not just names?
Yes, rules can match on text found inside supported file types such as PDFs and text documents.
Kap: Does Kap do screenshots or only video?
It is focused on video and GIF recording. For still screenshots with annotation, pair it with Shottr or CleanShot X.
Hazel: Does Hazel run in the background automatically?
Yes, it watches configured folders continuously and applies rules as files change, with no manual trigger needed.
Kap: Can Kap export directly to GIF?
Yes, GIF is one of its native export formats alongside MP4, WebM and Apple device frames.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hazel vs BetterTouchTool
- Hazel vs Karabiner-Elements
- Hazel vs Magnet
- Hazel vs CleanShot X
- Hazel vs Maccy
- Hazel vs Shottr
- Hazel vs Rectangle
- Hazel vs Paste
- Hazel vs Syncthing
- Hazel vs Calsense
- Hazel vs WizTree
- Hazel vs Yelp
- Hazel vs balenaEtcher
- Hazel vs Dominos
- Hazel vs PeaZip
- Hazel vs Deluge
- Hazel vs Rufus
- Hazel vs AutoHotkey
- Hazel vs CrystalDiskInfo
- Hazel vs Everything
- Hazel vs EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
- Hazel vs Google Lens
- Hazel vs HWiNFO
- Kap vs BetterTouchTool
- Kap vs Karabiner-Elements
- Kap vs Magnet
- Kap vs CleanShot X
- Kap vs Maccy
- Kap vs Shottr
- Kap vs Rectangle
- Kap vs Paste
- Kap vs Syncthing
- Kap vs Calsense
- Kap vs WizTree
- Kap vs Yelp
- Kap vs balenaEtcher
- Kap vs Dominos
- Kap vs PeaZip
- Kap vs Deluge
- Kap vs Rufus
- Kap vs AutoHotkey
- Kap vs CrystalDiskInfo
- Kap vs Everything
- Kap vs EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert
- Kap vs Google Lens
- Kap vs HWiNFO
