Developer Tools · head to head
Frappe vs StarRocks

Frappe
Developer Tools
The Python web framework behind ERPNext, sold as managed hosting through Frappe Cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

StarRocks
Databases
Apache 2.0 MPP analytical database built for joins on open table formats
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Frappe the framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.; StarRocks self-hosting is a genuine operations job: frontend and backend node roles, tablet distribution, compaction and materialised view refresh all need an owner, and there is no small-team-friendly single-binary mode.
- They diverge on capability: Frappe covers DocType modelling, StarRocks covers Cost-based optimiser.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Frappe and StarRocks actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Frappe
- DocType modelling
- Role and field permissions
- Built-in REST API
- Background jobs
- Bench CLI
- Frappe Cloud hosting
- App marketplace
- Multi-tenancy
Only in StarRocks
- Cost-based optimiser
- Lakehouse query engine
- Primary key tables
- Materialised views
- Shared-data mode
- MySQL wire protocol
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Frappe
- A team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an API on day one rather than in month threenot StarRocks
- An ERPNext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administratornot StarRocks
- An Indian or emerging-market business that wants to pay for application hosting in local currency at local price pointsnot StarRocks
- A consultancy shipping custom vertical apps to clients on a shared framework with per-client site isolationnot StarRocks
StarRocks
- Customer-facing analytics where queries join a fact table to several dimensions and must return in well under a secondnot Frappe
- Querying an Iceberg lakehouse directly without copying data into a proprietary warehouse formatnot Frappe
- Replacing a ClickHouse deployment that has become unmanageable because every new question needs another denormalised tablenot Frappe
- Real-time analytics fed by change data capture where rows must be updated in place rather than appendednot Frappe
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Frappe
- The framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.
- The developer pool is small and heavily concentrated in India, so hiring Frappe experience elsewhere is slow and expensive relative to mainstream stacks.
- Documentation is uneven in depth and lags behind releases in places, so real answers often come from reading the source or the community forum.
- Major version upgrades of the framework have historically broken custom apps that reach past the DocType layer, so bespoke code carries a recurring maintenance cost at each upgrade.
- Frappe Cloud recommends against its cheapest Hetzner-backed option for mission-critical production, so the headline $5 entry price is not the price of a production-grade deployment.
StarRocks
- Self-hosting is a genuine operations job: frontend and backend node roles, tablet distribution, compaction and materialised view refresh all need an owner, and there is no small-team-friendly single-binary mode.
- CelerData is by far the dominant contributor despite Linux Foundation stewardship, so the practical roadmap risk is the same as any single-vendor open source project.
- It inherits a MySQL-flavoured SQL dialect from its Doris ancestry, so queries written for PostgreSQL, Snowflake or Trino need rewriting rather than porting.
- Ecosystem support is thinner than ClickHouse or Trino: fewer client libraries, fewer managed hosting options and a much smaller pool of engineers who have run it in production.
- Memory pressure under concurrent large joins is a common production failure, and the tuning knobs for query memory limits are unforgiving compared with a cloud warehouse that just scales.
Pricing, plan by plan
Frappe
Free- Framework, self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- Install with bench on your own Linux servers
- You carry updates, backups and security patching
- Frappe Cloud Sites$5/month
- Also listed at ₹410 per month
- Shared servers with 150+ installable apps
- Automatic updates and offsite backups
- Frappe Cloud Servers$40/month
- Also listed at ₹3,600 per month
- Dedicated or shared virtual machines
- Unlimited sites on your server
StarRocks
Free- StarRocksFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Linux Foundation governance
- No usage or node limits
- CelerData Cloud$undefined/year
- Managed StarRocks from the primary contributor
- BYOC and serverless deployment options
- Enterprise support and SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose Frappe if
- You need doctype modelling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want role and field permissions.
Choose StarRocks if
- You need cost-based optimiser.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want lakehouse query engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Frappe or StarRocks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Frappe starts at Free and StarRocks at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Frappe or StarRocks?
- Frappe starts at Free and StarRocks at Free.
- Does Frappe or StarRocks run on more platforms?
- Frappe runs on Web, Linux, Docker. StarRocks runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Frappe for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Frappe best used for?
- Frappe is most often used for a team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an api on day one rather than in month three, an erpnext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administrator, an indian or emerging-market business that wants to pay for application hosting in local currency at local price points, a consultancy shipping custom vertical apps to clients on a shared framework with per-client site isolation. Of those, a team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an api on day one rather than in month three and an erpnext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administrator are not what StarRocks is typically brought in for.
- What can Frappe do that StarRocks cannot?
- Frappe covers DocType modelling, Role and field permissions, Built-in REST API, Background jobs. StarRocks covers Cost-based optimiser, Lakehouse query engine, Primary key tables, Materialised views.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Frappe: Is Frappe the same as ERPNext?
No. Frappe is the framework; ERPNext is the ERP application written on it. You can run Frappe without ERPNext to build your own applications.
StarRocks: Is StarRocks open source?
Yes, Apache 2.0, governed under the Linux Foundation since 2023.
Frappe: What licence is the framework under?
MIT, which is permissive and imposes no obligation to publish your changes, unlike the AGPL used by several open source ERP rivals.
StarRocks: How does it differ from ClickHouse?
StarRocks is built for joins across a star schema with a cost-based optimiser; ClickHouse is fastest on denormalised single tables.
Frappe: Can I pay in rupees?
Yes. Frappe Cloud publishes the same plans in Indian rupees, ₹410 a month for sites and ₹3,600 for servers, rather than converting a dollar price at checkout.
StarRocks: Who maintains it?
CelerData, formerly StarRocks Inc, is the dominant contributor and sells the managed service.
Frappe: Do I have to use Frappe Cloud?
No, self-hosting with bench or Docker is fully supported and free. Frappe Cloud is a convenience purchase, and it funds the open source work.
StarRocks: Can it query Iceberg tables directly?
Yes, along with Hudi, Delta Lake, Hive and Paimon, with a local cache for repeat queries.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Frappe vs Pants Build
- Frappe vs Helix
- Frappe vs Jitsu
- Frappe vs Steampipe
- Frappe vs Tilt
- Frappe vs Backstage
- Frappe vs Visual Studio Code
- Frappe vs Penpot
- Frappe vs GNU Emacs
- Frappe vs Bazel
- Frappe vs Eclipse IDE
- Frappe vs Swagger UI
- Frappe vs Depot
- Frappe vs Earthly
- Frappe vs Harness
- Frappe vs Moonrepo
- Frappe vs Nx Cloud
- Frappe vs ClickHouse
- Frappe vs Apache Druid
- Frappe vs Presto
- Frappe vs DuckDB
- Frappe vs Dremio
- Frappe vs Aiven
- Frappe vs Typesense
- Frappe vs VerneMQ
- Frappe vs PostgreSQL
- Frappe vs RabbitMQ
- Frappe vs Vitess
- Frappe vs BigQuery
- Frappe vs CosmosDB
- Frappe vs DataStax
- Frappe vs dbt
- Frappe vs Apache Doris
- Frappe vs Apache Kafka
- StarRocks vs Pants Build
- StarRocks vs Helix
- StarRocks vs Jitsu
- StarRocks vs Steampipe
- StarRocks vs Tilt
- StarRocks vs Backstage
- StarRocks vs Visual Studio Code
- StarRocks vs Penpot
- StarRocks vs GNU Emacs
- StarRocks vs Bazel
- StarRocks vs Eclipse IDE
- StarRocks vs Swagger UI
- StarRocks vs Depot
- StarRocks vs Earthly
- StarRocks vs Harness
- StarRocks vs Moonrepo
- StarRocks vs Nx Cloud
- StarRocks vs ClickHouse
- StarRocks vs Apache Druid
- StarRocks vs Presto
- StarRocks vs DuckDB
- StarRocks vs Dremio
- StarRocks vs Aiven
- StarRocks vs Typesense
- StarRocks vs VerneMQ
- StarRocks vs PostgreSQL
- StarRocks vs RabbitMQ
- StarRocks vs Vitess
- StarRocks vs BigQuery
- StarRocks vs CosmosDB
- StarRocks vs DataStax
- StarRocks vs dbt
- StarRocks vs Apache Doris
- StarRocks vs Apache Kafka
