Browser Extensions · head to head
Fireshot vs Wappalyzer
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fireshot pro yearly license is capped at 2 devices for personal use; additional devices require a separate license purchase; Wappalyzer cannot detect server-side or hidden technologies without client-side footprints
- They diverge on capability: Fireshot covers Full page capture, Wappalyzer covers Technology detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fireshot and Wappalyzer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fireshot | Wappalyzer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera | Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Web |
| Founded | 2007 | 2009 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fireshot
- Full page capture
- Multiple formats
- Annotation
- Direct upload
- Opera support
Only in Wappalyzer
- Technology detection
- CMS identification
- Framework analysis
- Analytics tracking
Both cover
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fireshot
- Capturing and annotating full-page screenshots of web pagesnot Wappalyzer
Wappalyzer
- Building target prospect lists filtered by specific technology adoptionnot Fireshot
- Detecting when competitors migrate to new development stacksnot Fireshot
- Enriching CRM records with discovered technology stack informationnot Fireshot
- Identifying timing signals from prospect infrastructure changesnot Fireshot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fireshot
- Pro yearly license is capped at 2 devices for personal use; additional devices require a separate license purchase
Wappalyzer
- Cannot detect server-side or hidden technologies without client-side footprints
- Went closed-source in 2023; self-hosting now difficult without maintaining community forks
- Data export features locked to Business plan ($450/month) minimum
Pricing, plan by plan
Fireshot
Free- FreeFree
- Full page capture
- PNG/JPEG export
- Basic annotation
Wappalyzer
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Wappalyzer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Fireshot if
- You need full page capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera.
- You also want multiple formats.
Choose Wappalyzer if
- You need technology detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Web.
- You also want cms identification.
Questions people ask
- Is Fireshot or Wappalyzer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fireshot starts at Free and Wappalyzer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fireshot or Wappalyzer?
- Fireshot starts at Free and Wappalyzer at Free.
- Does Fireshot or Wappalyzer run on more platforms?
- Fireshot runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera. Wappalyzer runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Web.
- Can I use Fireshot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Fireshot best used for?
- Fireshot is most often used for capturing and annotating full-page screenshots of web pages. Of those, capturing and annotating full-page screenshots of web pages is not what Wappalyzer is typically brought in for.
- What can Fireshot do that Wappalyzer cannot?
- Fireshot covers Full page capture, Multiple formats, Annotation, Direct upload. Wappalyzer covers Technology detection, CMS identification, Framework analysis, Analytics tracking. Both handle Chrome support, Firefox support, Edge support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Wappalyzer: Does Wappalyzer have a free version?
Yes. Wappalyzer's browser extension is completely free and provides unlimited technology lookups with no account required. The free tier includes basic website technology detection across all categories.
SourceWappalyzer: What are the paid pricing tiers for Wappalyzer?
Wappalyzer's paid plans start at $250/month for Pro (5,000 lookups, 1 user), $450/month for Business (20,000 lookups, 5 users, API access), and $850+/month for Enterprise (200,000+ lookups, 25+ users). Annual billing offers 17% discount.
SourceWappalyzer: Can Wappalyzer detect all website technologies?
Wappalyzer detects over 1,000 technologies but cannot detect server-side or hidden technologies, backend infrastructure, internal databases, or ERP systems with no client-side footprint.
SourceWappalyzer: Can Wappalyzer be self-hosted?
Wappalyzer went closed-source in 2023 when the GitHub repository was taken down. It can be deployed via Docker or npm, but the community-contributed fingerprint database is now part of the commercial product. Open-source forks are available but not officially maintained.
SourceWappalyzer: What integrations does Wappalyzer offer?
Wappalyzer integrates with CRM systems like Salesforce and HubSpot, and supports lead list exports and API access for business users on paid plans.
SourceWappalyzer: When does Wappalyzer data export become available?
Data export and lead list generation features are only available on the Business plan ($450/month) and above, not on the Pro tier.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fireshot vs Raindrop.io
- Fireshot vs Pocket
- Fireshot vs Dark Reader
- Fireshot vs Privacy Badger
- Fireshot vs GoFullPage
- Fireshot vs Nimbus Screenshot
- Fireshot vs Awesome Screenshot
- Fireshot vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Fireshot vs Instapaper
- Fireshot vs Momentum
- Fireshot vs Rakuten
- Fireshot vs uBlock Origin
- Fireshot vs Web Developer
- Fireshot vs Arc
- Fireshot vs ColorZilla
- Fireshot vs FireMonkey
- Fireshot vs HTTPS Everywhere
- Fireshot vs BuiltWith
- Fireshot vs JSON Viewer
- Fireshot vs React Developer Tools
- Fireshot vs Vue.js Devtools
- Fireshot vs Redux DevTools
- Fireshot vs SimilarWeb
- Fireshot vs Ghostery
- Fireshot vs Save to Google Drive
- Fireshot vs Userscripts
- Fireshot vs LanguageTool
- Fireshot vs Mercury Reader
- Fireshot vs ProWritingAid
- Wappalyzer vs Raindrop.io
- Wappalyzer vs Pocket
- Wappalyzer vs Dark Reader
- Wappalyzer vs Privacy Badger
- Wappalyzer vs GoFullPage
- Wappalyzer vs Nimbus Screenshot
- Wappalyzer vs Awesome Screenshot
- Wappalyzer vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Wappalyzer vs Instapaper
- Wappalyzer vs Momentum
- Wappalyzer vs Rakuten
- Wappalyzer vs uBlock Origin
- Wappalyzer vs Web Developer
- Wappalyzer vs Arc
- Wappalyzer vs ColorZilla
- Wappalyzer vs FireMonkey
- Wappalyzer vs HTTPS Everywhere
- Wappalyzer vs BuiltWith
- Wappalyzer vs JSON Viewer
- Wappalyzer vs React Developer Tools
- Wappalyzer vs Vue.js Devtools
- Wappalyzer vs Redux DevTools
- Wappalyzer vs SimilarWeb
- Wappalyzer vs Ghostery
- Wappalyzer vs Save to Google Drive
- Wappalyzer vs Userscripts
- Wappalyzer vs LanguageTool
- Wappalyzer vs Mercury Reader
- Wappalyzer vs ProWritingAid


