Browser Extensions · head to head
FireMonkey vs WordPress

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.; WordPress self-hosted installation requires PHP 8.3 and MySQL 8.0 or MariaDB 10.11 minimum; older versions expose security vulnerabilities
- They diverge on capability: FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, WordPress covers Content management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FireMonkey and WordPress actually diverge.
| Attribute | FireMonkey | WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Firefox | Web (self-hosted), WordPress.com (SaaS) |
| Category | Browser Extensions | Content Creation |
| Founded | Unknown | 2003 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
Only in WordPress
- Content management
- Theme system
- Plugin architecture
- User management
- SEO optimization
- Media management
- Comment system
- Multilingual support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot WordPress
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot WordPress
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot WordPress
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot WordPress
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot WordPress
WordPress
- Content management and blog publishingnot FireMonkey
- Website building with themes and pluginsnot FireMonkey
- E-commerce with WooCommercenot FireMonkey
- Community sites and forumsnot FireMonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
WordPress
- Self-hosted installation requires PHP 8.3 and MySQL 8.0 or MariaDB 10.11 minimum; older versions expose security vulnerabilities
- Requires web server (Apache or Nginx) setup and ongoing maintenance; not suitable for serverless deployment
- HTTPS mandatory for all installations; HTTP-only setups are not supported
- Self-hosting requires responsibility for security patches, backups, and server administration
Pricing, plan by plan
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
WordPress
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the WordPress review.
Which should you pick?
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Choose WordPress if
- You need content management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web (self-hosted), WordPress.com (SaaS).
- You also want theme system.
Questions people ask
- Is FireMonkey or WordPress better?
- Neither clearly leads. FireMonkey starts at Free and WordPress at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FireMonkey or WordPress?
- FireMonkey starts at Free and WordPress at Free.
- Does FireMonkey or WordPress run on more platforms?
- FireMonkey runs on Firefox. WordPress runs on Web (self-hosted), WordPress.com (SaaS).
- Can I use FireMonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FireMonkey best used for?
- FireMonkey is most often used for running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions, restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes, editing scripts in a full editor inside the browser, injecting css globally across every site. Of those, running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions and restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes are not what WordPress is typically brought in for.
- What can FireMonkey do that WordPress cannot?
- FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection. WordPress covers Content management, Theme system, Plugin architecture, User management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceWordPress: Does WordPress charge licensing fees for using the software?
WordPress is free and open source software, meaning there are no licensing costs to download or use the platform itself.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceWordPress: What costs should I expect when running a WordPress site?
While WordPress software is free, you will typically need to pay separately for web hosting, domain registration, and optional premium themes or plugins. These costs are not part of WordPress itself but are provided by third-party services.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs GoFullPage
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs Weebly
- FireMonkey vs Hashnode
- FireMonkey vs Micro.blog
- FireMonkey vs Logseq
- FireMonkey vs OBS Studio
- FireMonkey vs Confluence
- FireMonkey vs Trint
- FireMonkey vs Notion Web Clipper
- FireMonkey vs Mintlify
- FireMonkey vs Kapwing
- FireMonkey vs Bynder Content Workflow
- FireMonkey vs GemPages
- FireMonkey vs Notion AI
- FireMonkey vs Kittl
- FireMonkey vs Pictory
- FireMonkey vs Podcastle
- WordPress vs Greasemonkey
- WordPress vs Violentmonkey
- WordPress vs Tampermonkey
- WordPress vs Userscripts
- WordPress vs Stay
- WordPress vs GoFullPage
- WordPress vs Stylus
- WordPress vs Pocket
- WordPress vs Dark Reader
- WordPress vs Raindrop.io
- WordPress vs Privacy Badger
- WordPress vs AdBlock Plus
- WordPress vs Night Eye
- WordPress vs React Developer Tools
- WordPress vs Save to Google Drive
- WordPress vs Vimeo Record
- WordPress vs Vue.js Devtools
- WordPress vs Weebly
- WordPress vs Hashnode
- WordPress vs Micro.blog
- WordPress vs Logseq
- WordPress vs OBS Studio
- WordPress vs Confluence
- WordPress vs Trint
- WordPress vs Notion Web Clipper
- WordPress vs Mintlify
- WordPress vs Kapwing
- WordPress vs Bynder Content Workflow
- WordPress vs GemPages
- WordPress vs Notion AI
- WordPress vs Kittl
- WordPress vs Pictory
- WordPress vs Podcastle

