Browser Extensions · head to head
FireMonkey vs ProtonVPN

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ProtonVPN
Cybersecurity
High-speed Swiss VPN that safeguards your privacy
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.; ProtonVPN free plan limited to one device at a time
- They diverge on capability: FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, ProtonVPN covers No-logs policy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FireMonkey and ProtonVPN actually diverge.
| Attribute | FireMonkey | ProtonVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Firefox | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Category | Browser Extensions | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
Only in ProtonVPN
- No-logs policy
- Secure Core
- Kill Switch
- DNS leak protection
- Tor over VPN
- Split tunneling
- NetShield ad-blocker
- VPN Accelerator
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot ProtonVPN
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot ProtonVPN
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot ProtonVPN
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot ProtonVPN
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot ProtonVPN
ProtonVPN
- Privacy-focused browsing without subscription costnot FireMonkey
- Multi-device protection with Plus plan supporting 10 devicesnot FireMonkey
- Integrated access to Proton email and cloud services via Unlimited plannot FireMonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
ProtonVPN
- Free plan limited to one device at a time
- Free plan restricted to 10 countries with random selection
- Pricing amounts not clearly published; shown as variable
Pricing, plan by plan
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
ProtonVPN
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ProtonVPN review.
Which should you pick?
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Choose ProtonVPN if
- You need no-logs policy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want secure core.
Questions people ask
- Is FireMonkey or ProtonVPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. FireMonkey starts at Free and ProtonVPN at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FireMonkey or ProtonVPN?
- FireMonkey starts at Free and ProtonVPN at Free.
- Does FireMonkey or ProtonVPN run on more platforms?
- FireMonkey runs on Firefox. ProtonVPN runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use FireMonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FireMonkey best used for?
- FireMonkey is most often used for running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions, restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes, editing scripts in a full editor inside the browser, injecting css globally across every site. Of those, running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions and restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes are not what ProtonVPN is typically brought in for.
- What can FireMonkey do that ProtonVPN cannot?
- FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection. ProtonVPN covers No-logs policy, Secure Core, Kill Switch, DNS leak protection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs GoFullPage
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs Surfshark
- FireMonkey vs Norton 360
- FireMonkey vs Bitdefender Total Security
- FireMonkey vs LastPass
- FireMonkey vs 1Password
- FireMonkey vs Avast One
- FireMonkey vs IVPN
- FireMonkey vs Mullvad VPN
- FireMonkey vs Private Internet Access
- FireMonkey vs Windscribe
- FireMonkey vs CyberGhost VPN
- FireMonkey vs Cosign
- FireMonkey vs Dahua Technology
- FireMonkey vs Descope
- FireMonkey vs Drata
- FireMonkey vs DTiQ
- FireMonkey vs ExpressVPN
- ProtonVPN vs Greasemonkey
- ProtonVPN vs Violentmonkey
- ProtonVPN vs Tampermonkey
- ProtonVPN vs Userscripts
- ProtonVPN vs Stay
- ProtonVPN vs GoFullPage
- ProtonVPN vs Stylus
- ProtonVPN vs Pocket
- ProtonVPN vs Dark Reader
- ProtonVPN vs Raindrop.io
- ProtonVPN vs Privacy Badger
- ProtonVPN vs AdBlock Plus
- ProtonVPN vs Night Eye
- ProtonVPN vs React Developer Tools
- ProtonVPN vs Save to Google Drive
- ProtonVPN vs Vimeo Record
- ProtonVPN vs Vue.js Devtools
- ProtonVPN vs Surfshark
- ProtonVPN vs Norton 360
- ProtonVPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- ProtonVPN vs LastPass
- ProtonVPN vs 1Password
- ProtonVPN vs Avast One
- ProtonVPN vs IVPN
- ProtonVPN vs Mullvad VPN
- ProtonVPN vs Private Internet Access
- ProtonVPN vs Windscribe
- ProtonVPN vs CyberGhost VPN
- ProtonVPN vs Cosign
- ProtonVPN vs Dahua Technology
- ProtonVPN vs Descope
- ProtonVPN vs Drata
- ProtonVPN vs DTiQ
- ProtonVPN vs ExpressVPN
