Browser Extensions · head to head
FireMonkey vs Moodle

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.; Moodle self-hosted deployment requires significant IT resources and technical expertise
- They diverge on capability: FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Moodle covers Course management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FireMonkey and Moodle actually diverge.
| Attribute | FireMonkey | Moodle |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Firefox | Web |
| Category | Browser Extensions | LMS |
| Founded | Unknown | 2002 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
Only in Moodle
- Course management
- Quiz builder
- Forums
- Assignments
- Gradebook
- Badges
- Competencies
- Mobile app
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot Moodle
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot Moodle
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot Moodle
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot Moodle
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot Moodle
Moodle
- Online learningnot FireMonkey
- Blended learningnot FireMonkey
- Corporate trainingnot FireMonkey
- Compliance trainingnot FireMonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
Moodle
- Self-hosted deployment requires significant IT resources and technical expertise
- Managed hosting has higher costs for large institutions compared to self-hosting
Pricing, plan by plan
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
Moodle
Free- Self-HostedFree
- Full feature access
- MoodleCloud Starter$200/year
- 50 users
- Managed hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Choose Moodle if
- You need course management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want quiz builder.
Questions people ask
- Is FireMonkey or Moodle better?
- Neither clearly leads. FireMonkey starts at Free and Moodle at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FireMonkey or Moodle?
- FireMonkey starts at Free and Moodle at Free.
- Does FireMonkey or Moodle run on more platforms?
- FireMonkey runs on Firefox. Moodle runs on Web.
- Can I use FireMonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FireMonkey best used for?
- FireMonkey is most often used for running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions, restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes, editing scripts in a full editor inside the browser, injecting css globally across every site. Of those, running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions and restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes are not what Moodle is typically brought in for.
- What can FireMonkey do that Moodle cannot?
- FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection. Moodle covers Course management, Quiz builder, Forums, Assignments.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceMoodle: Is Moodle free or paid?
Moodle is free and open-source software. However, self-hosting requires IT resources and server infrastructure. Managed cloud hosting through MoodleCloud starts at $200/year for 50 users.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceMoodle: What languages does Moodle support?
Moodle is available in over 160 languages, making it accessible to educators and learners worldwide.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceMoodle: Is Moodle suitable for corporations and enterprises?
Yes, Moodle is suitable for K-12, higher education, vocational training, and corporate learning. Moodle Workplace is the enterprise edition with multi-tenancy and compliance tooling.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceMoodle: What learning standards does Moodle support?
Moodle supports various e-learning standards including SCORM and Tin Can API for compatibility with other educational systems.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs GoFullPage
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs Canvas
- FireMonkey vs Sakai
- FireMonkey vs Chamilo
- FireMonkey vs Totara
- FireMonkey vs Claroline
- FireMonkey vs Schoology
- FireMonkey vs Google Classroom
- FireMonkey vs Edmodo
- FireMonkey vs ClassDojo
- FireMonkey vs CYPHER Learning
- FireMonkey vs LearnWorlds
- FireMonkey vs Absorb LMS
- FireMonkey vs Seesaw
- FireMonkey vs Weet
- FireMonkey vs Whatfix
- Moodle vs Greasemonkey
- Moodle vs Violentmonkey
- Moodle vs Tampermonkey
- Moodle vs Userscripts
- Moodle vs Stay
- Moodle vs GoFullPage
- Moodle vs Stylus
- Moodle vs Pocket
- Moodle vs Dark Reader
- Moodle vs Raindrop.io
- Moodle vs Privacy Badger
- Moodle vs AdBlock Plus
- Moodle vs Night Eye
- Moodle vs React Developer Tools
- Moodle vs Save to Google Drive
- Moodle vs Vimeo Record
- Moodle vs Vue.js Devtools
- Moodle vs Canvas
- Moodle vs Sakai
- Moodle vs Chamilo
- Moodle vs Totara
- Moodle vs Claroline
- Moodle vs Schoology
- Moodle vs Google Classroom
- Moodle vs Edmodo
- Moodle vs ClassDojo
- Moodle vs CYPHER Learning
- Moodle vs LearnWorlds
- Moodle vs Absorb LMS
- Moodle vs Seesaw
- Moodle vs Weet
- Moodle vs Whatfix

