Softwr

Personal Finance · head to head

Firefly III vs Wallet

Firefly III logo

Firefly III

Personal Finance

Free, open source, self-hosted personal finance manager with double-entry style accounting

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
W

Wallet

Personal Finance

Smart expense tracking and budgeting

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • They diverge on capability: Firefly III covers Double-entry style ledger, Wallet covers Expense tracking.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Firefly III and Wallet actually diverge.

Attributes where Firefly III and Wallet differ
AttributeFirefly IIIWallet
Pricing modelOpen source, no licence feefreemium
PlatformsWeb, Linux, DockerWeb, IOS, Android
FoundedUnknown2010

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Personal Finance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Firefly III

  • Double-entry style ledger
  • Multi-currency accounts
  • Bill and subscription tracking
  • Rule engine
  • Reports and charts
  • API access

Only in Wallet

  • Expense tracking
  • Budget management
  • Receipt scanning
  • Financial analytics
  • Bank accounts
  • Web support
  • IOS support
  • Android support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Firefly III

  • A self-hoster already running a home server or NAS who wants their financial ledger on the same infrastructurenot Wallet
  • Someone who wants double-entry style accuracy rather than simple envelope budgetingnot Wallet
  • A privacy-focused user who refuses to put financial data on any third-party server, hosted or otherwisenot Wallet
  • A developer who wants API access to build custom bank import scripts for accounts with no standard connectornot Wallet

Wallet

  • Budget Managementnot Firefly III
  • Expense Trackingnot Firefly III
  • Investment Trackingnot Firefly III

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Firefly III

  • There is no official managed hosting, so a non-technical user has no easy on-ramp the way Actual Budget offers with its paid hosted sync.
  • The double-entry-influenced model is less intuitive for newcomers than simple envelope budgeting, and the learning curve is real.
  • Automatic bank sync depends on the community-run importer and third-party connectors, and coverage and reliability vary a lot by bank and country.
  • Mobile access is via a web interface rather than a polished native app, which is a step behind Actual Budget or Lunch Money on phones.
  • Because there is no company behind it, security patching and feature development depend entirely on volunteer maintainer time.

Wallet

Nothing recorded yet. See the Wallet review.

Pricing, plan by plan

Firefly III

Free
  • Firefly IIIFree
    • Full functionality, self-hosted
    • No usage limits
    • Community support, donations accepted

Wallet

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Expense tracking
    • Basic budgets
  • Premium$4.99/month
    • Advanced analytics
    • Custom categories
    • Receipt scanning

Which should you pick?

Choose Firefly III if

  • You need double-entry style ledger.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
  • You also want multi-currency accounts.
Firefly III review

Choose Wallet if

  • You need expense tracking.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, IOS, Android.
  • You also want budget management.
Wallet review

Questions people ask

Is Firefly III or Wallet better?
Neither clearly leads. Firefly III starts at Free and Wallet at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Firefly III or Wallet?
Firefly III starts at Free and Wallet at Free.
Does Firefly III or Wallet run on more platforms?
Firefly III runs on Web, Linux, Docker. Wallet runs on Web, IOS, Android.
Can I use Firefly III for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Firefly III best used for?
Firefly III is most often used for a self-hoster already running a home server or nas who wants their financial ledger on the same infrastructure, someone who wants double-entry style accuracy rather than simple envelope budgeting, a privacy-focused user who refuses to put financial data on any third-party server, hosted or otherwise, a developer who wants api access to build custom bank import scripts for accounts with no standard connector. Of those, a self-hoster already running a home server or nas who wants their financial ledger on the same infrastructure and someone who wants double-entry style accuracy rather than simple envelope budgeting are not what Wallet is typically brought in for.
What can Firefly III do that Wallet cannot?
Firefly III covers Double-entry style ledger, Multi-currency accounts, Bill and subscription tracking, Rule engine. Wallet covers Expense tracking, Budget management, Receipt scanning, Financial analytics.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Firefly III: Can I pay someone to host Firefly III for me?

Not through the core project; some third-party providers sell Firefly III hosting independently, but there is no official managed service.

Firefly III: Does it support multiple currencies?

Yes, natively, including accounts and transactions in different currencies.

Firefly III: Is it really free with no paid tier?

Yes, the software is free and open source under the AGPL; the project accepts donations but sells nothing.

Share

Related pages

More on Firefly III

More on Wallet

Keep looking

Other head to heads