Cybersecurity · head to head
Falco vs Logto

Falco
Cybersecurity
CNCF-graduated runtime threat detection for Linux and Kubernetes using eBPF
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Logto
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity and authentication infrastructure for apps and APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Falco falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.; Logto advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.
- They diverge on capability: Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Falco and Logto actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Falco
- eBPF kernel instrumentation
- System call rules engine
- Container and Kubernetes context
- Default rule set
- Falcosidekick
- Falco Talon
- Plugins framework
- DaemonSet deployment
Only in Logto
- Prebuilt sign-in UI
- Social connectors
- Role-based access control
- Multi-factor authentication
- Machine-to-machine apps
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Falco
- A platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtimenot Logto
- A regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on Kubernetes nodes for an auditnot Logto
- A security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agentnot Logto
- A cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch itnot Logto
Logto
- Adding sign-in to a new SaaS productnot Falco
- Implementing SSO for B2B customersnot Falco
- Securing internal APIs with M2M tokensnot Falco
- Adding RBAC and organizations to a multi-tenant appnot Falco
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Falco
- Falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.
- The default rule set is noisy in real clusters and generates a large volume of benign matches from normal operational activity; without weeks of tuning, alert fatigue sets in and the team stops reading the feed, which is the usual failure mode.
- There is no storage, console, search or case management in the project, so a working detection capability means also running Falcosidekick, an event store, a dashboard and alert routing, all of which you build, host and maintain.
- The modern eBPF driver requires kernel 5.8 or later; older hosts fall back to the legacy probe or the kernel module, which brings driver-building against kernel headers and the operational fragility that comes with it on every kernel upgrade.
- Per-node syscall instrumentation carries measurable CPU overhead on busy hosts, and the cost scales with syscall volume rather than with cluster size, so the noisiest and most performance-sensitive workloads are exactly the ones that feel it most.
Logto
- Advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and requires contacting sales.
- Token-based billing can make cost forecasting harder than flat per-MAU pricing for high-traffic apps.
Pricing, plan by plan
Falco
Free- Falco (open source)Free
- Apache 2.0 licence, CNCF graduated project
- eBPF and kernel module drivers
- Full rules engine and default rule set
Logto
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 50,000 MAU
- 50K tokens included
- 3 applications
- Pro$24/month
- Unlimited MAU and applications
- 3 included API resources
- Passkey sign-in
Which should you pick?
Choose Falco if
- You need ebpf kernel instrumentation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want system call rules engine.
Choose Logto if
- You need prebuilt sign-in ui.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want social connectors.
Questions people ask
- Is Falco or Logto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Falco starts at Free and Logto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Falco or Logto?
- Falco starts at Free and Logto at Free.
- Does Falco or Logto run on more platforms?
- Falco runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Logto runs on web, api.
- Can I use Falco for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Falco best used for?
- Falco is most often used for a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime, a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit, a security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agent, a cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch it. Of those, a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime and a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit are not what Logto is typically brought in for.
- What can Falco do that Logto cannot?
- Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, System call rules engine, Container and Kubernetes context, Default rule set. Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI, Social connectors, Role-based access control, Multi-factor authentication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Falco: Does Falco block attacks?
No. It detects and emits events. Response requires Falco Talon or your own automation on top.
Logto: What does Logto cost?
Logto offers a Free plan at $0/month, a Pro plan starting at $24/month with 50K free tokens included, and a custom-priced Enterprise plan. Extra add-ons like RBAC or MFA are billed separately on Pro.
SourceFalco: Is Falco owned by Sysdig?
Sysdig created and open sourced it, but it graduated within the CNCF in February 2024, so governance sits with the foundation rather than the vendor.
Logto: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes. The Free plan supports up to 50,000 monthly active users, 3 total applications, 1 machine-to-machine app, 3 social connectors, 1 webhook, and 3-day audit log retention.
SourceFalco: What does it cost?
The project is Apache 2.0 with no licence fee. The cost is the storage, routing, tuning and staff time needed to make its output useful.
Logto: How is usage metered?
Logto uses token-based billing: only access tokens issued for authentication and authorization activity are counted, rather than charging purely per MAU.
SourceFalco: What kernel version do I need?
Kernel 5.8 or later for the default modern eBPF driver. Older hosts need the legacy eBPF probe or the kernel module.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Falco vs Snyk
- Falco vs Teleport
- Falco vs Darktrace
- Falco vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Falco vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Falco vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Falco vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Falco vs WireGuard
- Falco vs Bitwarden
- Falco vs Infisical
- Falco vs Semgrep
- Falco vs Trivy
- Falco vs One Identity
- Falco vs Ory Kratos
- Falco vs OWASP ZAP
- Falco vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Falco vs Passbolt
- Falco vs Ping Identity
- Falco vs Ory
- Falco vs authentik
- Falco vs Authelia
- Falco vs Clerk
- Falco vs 1Password
- Falco vs Frontegg
- Falco vs Sigstore
- Falco vs Veriff
- Falco vs Brave Browser
- Falco vs March Networks
- Falco vs Salient CompleteView
- Falco vs Sumsub
- Falco vs Tuta
- Logto vs Snyk
- Logto vs Teleport
- Logto vs Darktrace
- Logto vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Logto vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Logto vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Logto vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Logto vs WireGuard
- Logto vs Bitwarden
- Logto vs Infisical
- Logto vs Semgrep
- Logto vs Trivy
- Logto vs One Identity
- Logto vs Ory Kratos
- Logto vs OWASP ZAP
- Logto vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Logto vs Passbolt
- Logto vs Ping Identity
- Logto vs Ory
- Logto vs authentik
- Logto vs Authelia
- Logto vs Clerk
- Logto vs 1Password
- Logto vs Frontegg
- Logto vs Sigstore
- Logto vs Veriff
- Logto vs Brave Browser
- Logto vs March Networks
- Logto vs Salient CompleteView
- Logto vs Sumsub
- Logto vs Tuta
