Cybersecurity · head to head
Envysion vs IBM QRadar

Envysion
Cybersecurity
Managed video for restaurants and convenience stores that pairs camera footage with point of sale transaction data
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Envysion envysion now sits inside Motorola Solutions alongside Avigilon and Pelco, which overlap with it in retail video, so buyers should establish which platform Motorola intends to invest in before committing to a multi-year multi-site agreement.; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Envysion covers Point of sale exception reporting, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Envysion and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Envysion | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1911 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Envysion
- Point of sale exception reporting
- Cloud video review
- Audio capture
- Loss prevention case management
- Operational auditing
- Multi-site dashboards
- Franchise access controls
- Managed service model
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Envysion
- A 300-store quick service chain where till voids and refunds are a known shrink channelnot IBM QRadar
- A convenience retailer needing drive-through audio and video to settle a customer disputenot IBM QRadar
- A franchisor auditing food safety and uniform compliance across franchisee sites remotelynot IBM QRadar
- An investigator building an evidence package for a termination that will be challengednot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Envysion
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Envysion
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Envysion
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Envysion
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Envysion
- Envysion now sits inside Motorola Solutions alongside Avigilon and Pelco, which overlap with it in retail video, so buyers should establish which platform Motorola intends to invest in before committing to a multi-year multi-site agreement.
- Point of sale integration is per till system, so a chain running two or three POS platforms across acquired brands may find exception reporting works properly in only some of its stores.
- No pricing is published and it is sold as a per-site managed service, usually on a multi-year agreement, so a chain closing or refranchising stores mid-term can be paying for locations it no longer operates.
- It is built specifically for till-level retail and restaurant loss prevention and is a poor fit for campus, industrial or office security, so an operator with a mixed estate needs a second platform for the head office.
- Each site typically needs recording hardware installed, which makes rollout an install project per location rather than a software subscription, and refreshing that hardware is a periodic capital event the subscription does not cover.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Envysion
On request- Envysion managed video$undefined/year
- Priced per site as a managed service
- Recording hardware typically required in each location
- Point of sale integration scoped per till system
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Envysion if
- You need point of sale exception reporting.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want cloud video review.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Envysion or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Envysion starts at On request and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Envysion or IBM QRadar?
- Envysion starts at On request and IBM QRadar at On request.
- Does Envysion or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Envysion runs on Web, iOS, Android. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- What is Envysion best used for?
- Envysion is most often used for a 300-store quick service chain where till voids and refunds are a known shrink channel, a convenience retailer needing drive-through audio and video to settle a customer dispute, a franchisor auditing food safety and uniform compliance across franchisee sites remotely, an investigator building an evidence package for a termination that will be challenged. Of those, a 300-store quick service chain where till voids and refunds are a known shrink channel and a convenience retailer needing drive-through audio and video to settle a customer dispute are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Envysion do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Envysion covers Point of sale exception reporting, Cloud video review, Audio capture, Loss prevention case management. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Envysion: Who owns Envysion?
Motorola Solutions. It sits in the same video security portfolio as Avigilon, Pelco and Openpath.
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Envysion: What makes it different from a cloud camera service?
The point of sale integration. Exception reports link a void, refund or discount directly to the clip of that transaction, which is what makes multi-site review practical.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Envysion: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per site as a managed service, typically on a multi-year agreement.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Envysion: Will it work with my point of sale system?
Integration is built per POS platform, so confirm your specific system and version before buying, especially across acquired brands.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Envysion vs March Networks
- Envysion vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Envysion vs Camio
- Envysion vs DTiQ
- Envysion vs Milestone XProtect
- Envysion vs Salient CompleteView
- Envysion vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Envysion vs Hanwha Vision
- Envysion vs Dahua Technology
- Envysion vs Rhombus Systems
- Envysion vs Proofpoint
- Envysion vs BigID
- Envysion vs Arnica
- Envysion vs Authelia
- Envysion vs Authy
- Envysion vs Baffle
- Envysion vs Beyond Identity
- Envysion vs BeyondTrust
- Envysion vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Envysion vs 1Password
- Envysion vs Norton 360
- Envysion vs LastPass
- Envysion vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Envysion vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Envysion vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Envysion vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Envysion vs Recorded Future
- Envysion vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Envysion vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs March Networks
- IBM QRadar vs Eagle Eye Networks
- IBM QRadar vs Camio
- IBM QRadar vs DTiQ
- IBM QRadar vs Milestone XProtect
- IBM QRadar vs Salient CompleteView
- IBM QRadar vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- IBM QRadar vs Hanwha Vision
- IBM QRadar vs Dahua Technology
- IBM QRadar vs Rhombus Systems
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs BigID
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
