Cybersecurity · head to head
Eagle Eye Networks vs IBM QRadar

Eagle Eye Networks
Cybersecurity
Cloud video surveillance billed per camera per month, where retention length drives the bill more than anything else
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eagle Eye Networks cost scales with retention as well as resolution, and long retention has been observed to increase the monthly figure by 200 to 400 percent over 7 day storage, so an insurer or regulator raising the retention requirement can multiply the bill without adding cameras.; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Eagle Eye Networks covers Bridge and CMVR appliances, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eagle Eye Networks and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eagle Eye Networks | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per camera per month | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1911 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eagle Eye Networks
- Bridge and CMVR appliances
- Per-camera cloud retention
- Browser and mobile access
- Cloud analytics
- Licence plate recognition
- Multi-site management
- Video sharing and export
- Open API
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eagle Eye Networks
- A 40-site restaurant group that wants one login across every location without a recorder in each back officenot IBM QRadar
- A school district that must retain incident footage for a fixed statutory period and needs the retention set centrallynot IBM QRadar
- A car dealership needing footage shared with police within minutes of an overnight theftnot IBM QRadar
- A retailer replacing failing DVRs but keeping the ONVIF cameras already installednot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Eagle Eye Networks
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Eagle Eye Networks
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Eagle Eye Networks
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Eagle Eye Networks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eagle Eye Networks
- Cost scales with retention as well as resolution, and long retention has been observed to increase the monthly figure by 200 to 400 percent over 7 day storage, so an insurer or regulator raising the retention requirement can multiply the bill without adding cameras.
- Pricing is not published, so the widely cited 15 to 50 US dollars per camera per month range is a reseller-derived estimate rather than a rate you can hold Eagle Eye to.
- Every camera needs upstream bandwidth for continuous upload, so sites on poor connections either degrade quality or lose the cloud advantage, and the bridge only buffers for a limited period during an outage.
- Video lives in Eagle Eye’s data centres, which raises data residency questions for public bodies and for European buyers, and exit means downloading years of footage before a subscription ends.
- It is a per-camera subscription with no perpetual option, so a large site that would have paid once for an on-premises VMS pays indefinitely, and the crossover point against a Genetec or Milestone deployment usually arrives within a few years.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Eagle Eye Networks
On request- Cloud VMS subscription$undefined/month
- Priced per camera per month by resolution and retention
- Retention tiers of 7, 30, 90 and 180 days and 1, 2 and 3 years
- Independently observed range of roughly 15 to 50 USD per camera per month
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Eagle Eye Networks if
- You need bridge and cmvr appliances.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want per-camera cloud retention.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Eagle Eye Networks or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eagle Eye Networks starts at On request and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eagle Eye Networks or IBM QRadar?
- Eagle Eye Networks starts at On request and IBM QRadar at On request.
- Does Eagle Eye Networks or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Eagle Eye Networks runs on Web, iOS, Android. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- What is Eagle Eye Networks best used for?
- Eagle Eye Networks is most often used for a 40-site restaurant group that wants one login across every location without a recorder in each back office, a school district that must retain incident footage for a fixed statutory period and needs the retention set centrally, a car dealership needing footage shared with police within minutes of an overnight theft, a retailer replacing failing dvrs but keeping the onvif cameras already installed. Of those, a 40-site restaurant group that wants one login across every location without a recorder in each back office and a school district that must retain incident footage for a fixed statutory period and needs the retention set centrally are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Eagle Eye Networks do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Eagle Eye Networks covers Bridge and CMVR appliances, Per-camera cloud retention, Browser and mobile access, Cloud analytics. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eagle Eye Networks: Do I need Eagle Eye cameras?
No. The bridge connects existing ONVIF cameras, which is the main reason organisations pick it over camera-maker cloud services.
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Eagle Eye Networks: What does it cost per camera?
Not published. Independent observations put it between roughly 15 and 50 US dollars per camera per month depending on resolution and retention, with Canadian examples up to 79 for 90 day 4K.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Eagle Eye Networks: What happens if my internet drops?
The on-site bridge buffers recording locally and uploads when the connection returns, but buffer capacity is finite and a long outage loses footage.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Eagle Eye Networks: Where is my video stored?
In Eagle Eye’s data centres. Confirm the region before buying if you have data residency obligations.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
More on Eagle Eye Networks
Other head to heads
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Camio
- Eagle Eye Networks vs March Networks
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Envysion
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Genetec Security Center
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Hanwha Vision
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Rhombus Systems
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Spot AI
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Salient CompleteView
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Milestone XProtect
- Eagle Eye Networks vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Eagle Eye Networks vs DTiQ
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Dahua Technology
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Google Authenticator
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Grype
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Idira
- Eagle Eye Networks vs IVPN
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Logto
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Eagle Eye Networks vs 1Password
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Norton 360
- Eagle Eye Networks vs LastPass
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Eagle Eye Networks vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Eagle Eye Networks vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Recorded Future
- Eagle Eye Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Proofpoint
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Arnica
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Authelia
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Authy
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Baffle
- Eagle Eye Networks vs Beyond Identity
- Eagle Eye Networks vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Camio
- IBM QRadar vs March Networks
- IBM QRadar vs Envysion
- IBM QRadar vs Genetec Security Center
- IBM QRadar vs Hanwha Vision
- IBM QRadar vs Rhombus Systems
- IBM QRadar vs Spot AI
- IBM QRadar vs Salient CompleteView
- IBM QRadar vs Milestone XProtect
- IBM QRadar vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- IBM QRadar vs DTiQ
- IBM QRadar vs Dahua Technology
- IBM QRadar vs Google Authenticator
- IBM QRadar vs Grype
- IBM QRadar vs Idira
- IBM QRadar vs IVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Logto
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
