Developer Tools · head to head
Envoy vs Tenable Nessus

Envoy
Developer Tools
A high-performance L7 proxy written in C++ that is configured by an API rather than a config file, and is usually deployed under a control plane.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Tenable Nessus
Cybersecurity
Network vulnerability scanner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Envoy is free; Tenable Nessus starts at $2600/yr.
- Only Envoy lists protocol breadth; only Tenable Nessus lists network scanning.
- Where Tenable Nessus falls short: nessus Professional is $4,790 for one year, sold as an annual licence rather than a per scan or usage based fee.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Envoy and Tenable Nessus actually diverge.
| Attribute | Envoy | Tenable Nessus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source | Subscription |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, Linux, macOS, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Envoy.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Envoy
- xDS dynamic configuration
- Protocol breadth
- Filter chain architecture
- Observability by default
- Outlier detection
- Traffic shaping
- mTLS termination and origination
- Hot restart
Only in Tenable Nessus
- Network scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Configuration assessment
- Malware detection
- Compliance checking
- Cloud security assessment
- Mobile scanning
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Envoy
- Acting as the data plane under a service mesh or Gateway API implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use itnot Tenable Nessus
- An edge or API gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxyingnot Tenable Nessus
- Migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow trafficnot Tenable Nessus
- Standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written innot Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
- Vulnerability scanning of servers, network devices and web applicationsnot Envoy
- Configuration and compliance auditing against hardening benchmarksnot Envoy
- Point in time assessments by consultants and penetration testersnot Envoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Envoy
- The configuration surface is very large and hand-written bootstrap YAML runs to hundreds of lines for routing that Nginx expresses in twenty, which is why nearly every production deployment sits under a control plane and inherits that control plane's constraints as well
- xDS is the real API and it is not stable in the comfortable sense; the v2 API set was removed outright, resource types continue to be deprecated, and your control plane and Envoy binaries have to be upgraded roughly in step or the proxies stop accepting configuration
- Extending it properly means writing a C++ filter and building and maintaining your own Envoy binary; the alternatives are Lua, which adds per-request overhead, and proxy-wasm, whose ABI has remained effectively experimental for years with a real performance cost
- At sidecar density the per-proxy memory and CPU footprint is a measurable share of cluster capacity, since thousands of workloads each carry a full proxy, and this is precisely the cost that has pushed mesh projects towards node-level or ambient architectures
- There is no single vendor selling support for Envoy itself; you get the community plus control-plane vendors such as Solo.io and Tetrate, so an Envoy-level production bug is your own engineers in a C++ codebase unless a support contract happens to cover it
- Diagnosing why a request got a particular response involves reading config dumps, the stats endpoint and the RESPONSE_FLAGS codes in access logs rather than a readable error, which is a specific skill you must hire or spend months growing
Tenable Nessus
- Nessus Professional is $4,790 for one year, sold as an annual licence rather than a per scan or usage based fee
- Support beyond the base entitlement costs an extra $400 per year for Advanced Support with 24x365 phone and chat access
- The on demand training course is a separate $275 purchase for a single person for one year
- Multi year discounts require paying for two or three years up front
Pricing, plan by plan
Envoy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Envoy review.
Tenable Nessus
Free- Nessus EssentialsFree
- Up to 16 ips
- Network scanning
- Vulnerability assessment
- Nessus Professional$2,600/yr
- Unlimited targets
- Enterprise features
- Advanced analytics
- Nessus Expert$5,200/yr
- All Professional features
- Cloud integration
- Advanced reporting
Which should you pick?
Choose Envoy if
- You need xds dynamic configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want protocol breadth.
Choose Tenable Nessus if
- You need network scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Envoy or Tenable Nessus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Envoy starts at Free and Tenable Nessus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Envoy or Tenable Nessus?
- Envoy starts at Free and Tenable Nessus at Free.
- Does Envoy or Tenable Nessus run on more platforms?
- Envoy runs on Web. Tenable Nessus runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, Web.
- Can I use Envoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Envoy best used for?
- Envoy is most often used for acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it, an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying, migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow traffic, standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written in. Of those, acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it and an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying are not what Tenable Nessus is typically brought in for.
- What can Envoy do that Tenable Nessus cannot?
- Envoy covers xDS dynamic configuration, Protocol breadth, Filter chain architecture, Observability by default. Tenable Nessus covers Network scanning, Vulnerability detection, Configuration assessment, Malware detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Envoy: Should I run Envoy on its own, or under a control plane?
Almost always under one. Directly authoring xDS or static bootstrap configuration is viable for a handful of routes and becomes unmanageable beyond that. Envoy Gateway, Istio, Contour, Gloo and Consul all exist to generate that configuration for you.
Tenable Nessus: What are the three Nessus offerings?
Nessus Essentials is a free introductory offering for educators, students, and career starters, limited to 16 IPs for scanning. Nessus Professional is designed for consultants and SMBs, providing unlimited IT scans across any location. Nessus Expert is the premium offering extending Professional with web application scanning, infrastructure-as-code scanning, and external attack surface assessment up to 5 domains.
SourceEnvoy: How does it compare with Nginx or HAProxy?
Envoy is dynamically configured over an API and instrumented far more heavily; Nginx and HAProxy are faster to configure and lighter for straightforward reverse proxying. If you never need to change routing without a reload, Envoy is more machinery than the problem requires.
Tenable Nessus: What OS platforms does Nessus support?
Nessus runs on Debian/Kali Linux, Fedora, FreeBSD, Mac OS X, Red Hat/CentOS, SUSE Linux, Ubuntu, and various Windows versions including Server 2008, 2012, and Windows 7-10.
SourceEnvoy: What does it cost?
Nothing to licence; it is Apache 2.0 and there is no paid edition. The cost is engineering time and, for most organisations, a commercial control plane or cloud service that packages it.
Tenable Nessus: Can I use Nessus to scan third-party networks as a consultant?
Yes, Tenable permits you to use Nessus to scan third-party networks. Nessus Professional is ideal for consultants.
SourceEnvoy: Can I write extensions without C++?
You can write Lua filters or proxy-wasm modules in Rust, Go, C++ or AssemblyScript. Both carry per-request overhead compared with a native filter, and the Wasm path has been slower to stabilise than the project originally projected.
Tenable Nessus: Can Nessus perform PCI external scanning?
Yes, you can use Nessus Professional to perform external network scans as required by the PCI DSS 11.2.2 requirement.
SourceEnvoy: Is it a CNCF project?
Yes, it is a graduated CNCF project licensed under Apache 2.0, which means the trademark and governance sit with the foundation rather than with Lyft or any vendor.
Tenable Nessus: What additional features does Nessus Expert provide?
Web application scanning, which is dynamic application security testing (DAST) providing comprehensive visibility and insight into web application security issues; scanning code repositories for vulnerabilities; and assessing external attack surface with subdomain discovery.
SourceTenable Nessus: What support options exist for Nessus Professional?
Standard Support includes software upgrades, patches, plugin access, and 24x7 support via chat and community portal. Advanced Support adds 24x7 phone access and committed SLAs: P1 less than 2 hours, P2 less than 4 hours, P3 less than 12 hours, P4 less than 24 hours.
SourceTenable Nessus: How frequently are Nessus plugins updated?
Nessus plugins are updated daily, based on when vendors and security research sites publish new vulnerabilities.
SourceTenable Nessus: How does licensing work in virtual machine environments?
Whether you are using Nessus in a physical or a virtual environment, the IP addresses or hosts that you are scanning from must be licensed.
SourceRelated pages
More on Tenable Nessus
Other head to heads
- Envoy vs Istio
- Envoy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Envoy vs Spacelift
- Envoy vs Atlantis
- Envoy vs Jenkins
- Envoy vs Hookdeck
- Envoy vs Restate
- Envoy vs Helix
- Envoy vs Turborepo
- Envoy vs StackBlitz
- Envoy vs Webpack
- Envoy vs Backstage
- Envoy vs OpsLevel
- Envoy vs PartyKit
- Envoy vs PhpStorm
- Envoy vs Pieces for Developers
- Envoy vs RAD Studio
- Envoy vs Refact
- Envoy vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Envoy vs Okta
- Envoy vs Darktrace
- Envoy vs Qualys VMDR
- Envoy vs Acunetix
- Envoy vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Envoy vs Recorded Future
- Envoy vs Private Internet Access
- Envoy vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Envoy vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Envoy vs Burp Suite
- Envoy vs IBM QRadar
- Envoy vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Envoy vs Infisical
- Envoy vs JumpCloud
- Envoy vs McAfee Total Protection
- Envoy vs NICE Actimize
- Envoy vs Semgrep
- Tenable Nessus vs Istio
- Tenable Nessus vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Tenable Nessus vs Spacelift
- Tenable Nessus vs Atlantis
- Tenable Nessus vs Jenkins
- Tenable Nessus vs Hookdeck
- Tenable Nessus vs Restate
- Tenable Nessus vs Helix
- Tenable Nessus vs Turborepo
- Tenable Nessus vs StackBlitz
- Tenable Nessus vs Webpack
- Tenable Nessus vs Backstage
- Tenable Nessus vs OpsLevel
- Tenable Nessus vs PartyKit
- Tenable Nessus vs PhpStorm
- Tenable Nessus vs Pieces for Developers
- Tenable Nessus vs RAD Studio
- Tenable Nessus vs Refact
- Tenable Nessus vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Tenable Nessus vs Okta
- Tenable Nessus vs Darktrace
- Tenable Nessus vs Qualys VMDR
- Tenable Nessus vs Acunetix
- Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Tenable Nessus vs Recorded Future
- Tenable Nessus vs Private Internet Access
- Tenable Nessus vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Tenable Nessus vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Tenable Nessus vs Burp Suite
- Tenable Nessus vs IBM QRadar
- Tenable Nessus vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Tenable Nessus vs Infisical
- Tenable Nessus vs JumpCloud
- Tenable Nessus vs McAfee Total Protection
- Tenable Nessus vs NICE Actimize
- Tenable Nessus vs Semgrep
