Developer Tools · head to head
Envoy vs SentinelOne Singularity

Envoy
Developer Tools
A high-performance L7 proxy written in C++ that is configured by an API rather than a config file, and is usually deployed under a control plane.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

SentinelOne Singularity
Cybersecurity
Autonomous AI-powered endpoint security
- From
- $5.83/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- SentinelOne Singularity is an AI-powered platform.
- Envoy is free; SentinelOne Singularity starts at $5.83/mo.
- Only Envoy lists xDS dynamic configuration; only SentinelOne Singularity lists behavioral AI.
- Where SentinelOne Singularity falls short: deployment and configuration requires professional services ($5,000 to $25,000).
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Envoy and SentinelOne Singularity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Envoy | SentinelOne Singularity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $5.83/month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, macOS, Linux, Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Not yet recorded: pricing model for SentinelOne Singularity, founded for Envoy.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Envoy
- xDS dynamic configuration
- Protocol breadth
- Filter chain architecture
- Observability by default
- Outlier detection
- Traffic shaping
- mTLS termination and origination
- Hot restart
Only in SentinelOne Singularity
- Behavioral AI
- Autonomous response
- ActiveEDR
- Storyline technology
- Rollback remediation
- Ranger IoT
- Cloud workload protection
- Identity security
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Envoy
- Acting as the data plane under a service mesh or Gateway API implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use itnot SentinelOne Singularity
- An edge or API gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxyingnot SentinelOne Singularity
- Migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow trafficnot SentinelOne Singularity
- Standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written innot SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
- Endpoint Securitynot Envoy
- Edrnot Envoy
- Xdrnot Envoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Envoy
- The configuration surface is very large and hand-written bootstrap YAML runs to hundreds of lines for routing that Nginx expresses in twenty, which is why nearly every production deployment sits under a control plane and inherits that control plane's constraints as well
- xDS is the real API and it is not stable in the comfortable sense; the v2 API set was removed outright, resource types continue to be deprecated, and your control plane and Envoy binaries have to be upgraded roughly in step or the proxies stop accepting configuration
- Extending it properly means writing a C++ filter and building and maintaining your own Envoy binary; the alternatives are Lua, which adds per-request overhead, and proxy-wasm, whose ABI has remained effectively experimental for years with a real performance cost
- At sidecar density the per-proxy memory and CPU footprint is a measurable share of cluster capacity, since thousands of workloads each carry a full proxy, and this is precisely the cost that has pushed mesh projects towards node-level or ambient architectures
- There is no single vendor selling support for Envoy itself; you get the community plus control-plane vendors such as Solo.io and Tetrate, so an Envoy-level production bug is your own engineers in a C++ codebase unless a support contract happens to cover it
- Diagnosing why a request got a particular response involves reading config dumps, the stats endpoint and the RESPONSE_FLAGS codes in access logs rather than a readable error, which is a specific skill you must hire or spend months growing
SentinelOne Singularity
- Deployment and configuration requires professional services ($5,000 to $25,000)
- Optional modules like Ranger and Vigilance add to total cost of ownership
- Complex pricing tiers make budgeting difficult for large deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Envoy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Envoy review.
SentinelOne Singularity
$5.83/month- Singularity Core$5.83
- Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
- Malware prevention
- Threat isolation
- Singularity Control$6.67
- All Core features
- Device control
- Firewall control
- Singularity Complete$8.25
- All Control features
- Endpoint Detection and Response
- XDR capabilities
- Singularity Commercial$17.5
- All Complete features
- Identity protection
- Cloud protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Envoy if
- You need xds dynamic configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want protocol breadth.
Choose SentinelOne Singularity if
- You need behavioral ai.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want autonomous response.
Questions people ask
- Is Envoy or SentinelOne Singularity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Envoy starts at Free and SentinelOne Singularity at $5.83/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Envoy or SentinelOne Singularity?
- Envoy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Envoy and $5.83/month for SentinelOne Singularity.
- Does Envoy or SentinelOne Singularity run on more platforms?
- Envoy runs on Web. SentinelOne Singularity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Envoy for free?
- Yes. Envoy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. SentinelOne Singularity starts at $5.83/month.
- What is Envoy best used for?
- Envoy is most often used for acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it, an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying, migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow traffic, standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written in. Of those, acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it and an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying are not what SentinelOne Singularity is typically brought in for.
- What can Envoy do that SentinelOne Singularity cannot?
- Envoy covers xDS dynamic configuration, Protocol breadth, Filter chain architecture, Observability by default. SentinelOne Singularity covers Behavioral AI, Autonomous response, ActiveEDR, Storyline technology.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Envoy: Should I run Envoy on its own, or under a control plane?
Almost always under one. Directly authoring xDS or static bootstrap configuration is viable for a handful of routes and becomes unmanageable beyond that. Envoy Gateway, Istio, Contour, Gloo and Consul all exist to generate that configuration for you.
SentinelOne Singularity: What does SentinelOne Singularity XDR cover?
Singularity XDR unifies detection and response across endpoints, cloud, identity, network, and mobile, providing centralized visibility and automated response across all attack surfaces.
SourceEnvoy: How does it compare with Nginx or HAProxy?
Envoy is dynamically configured over an API and instrumented far more heavily; Nginx and HAProxy are faster to configure and lighter for straightforward reverse proxying. If you never need to change routing without a reload, Envoy is more machinery than the problem requires.
SentinelOne Singularity: How does SentinelOne correlate data across security tools?
Singularity normalizes data from endpoints, identity, cloud, and third-party security tools into a unified data layer, enabling automatic correlation of signals without manual integration.
SourceEnvoy: What does it cost?
Nothing to licence; it is Apache 2.0 and there is no paid edition. The cost is engineering time and, for most organisations, a commercial control plane or cloud service that packages it.
SentinelOne Singularity: Can SentinelOne integrate with existing security tools?
Yes, Singularity Marketplace provides pre-built, one-click integrations with email, network, firewall, and SaaS security tools, avoiding vendor lock-in while extending detection capabilities.
SourceEnvoy: Can I write extensions without C++?
You can write Lua filters or proxy-wasm modules in Rust, Go, C++ or AssemblyScript. Both carry per-request overhead compared with a native filter, and the Wasm path has been slower to stabilise than the project originally projected.
SentinelOne Singularity: What is the pricing model for SentinelOne Singularity?
SentinelOne pricing ranges from $5.83 to $17.50 per endpoint per month across five tiers, with optional add-on modules and enterprise pricing available on request.
SourceEnvoy: Is it a CNCF project?
Yes, it is a graduated CNCF project licensed under Apache 2.0, which means the trademark and governance sit with the foundation rather than with Lyft or any vendor.
Related pages
More on SentinelOne Singularity
Other head to heads
- Envoy vs Istio
- Envoy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Envoy vs Spacelift
- Envoy vs Atlantis
- Envoy vs Jenkins
- Envoy vs Hookdeck
- Envoy vs Restate
- Envoy vs Helix
- Envoy vs Turborepo
- Envoy vs StackBlitz
- Envoy vs Webpack
- Envoy vs Backstage
- Envoy vs OpsLevel
- Envoy vs PartyKit
- Envoy vs PhpStorm
- Envoy vs Pieces for Developers
- Envoy vs RAD Studio
- Envoy vs Refact
- Envoy vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Envoy vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Envoy vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Envoy vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Envoy vs VMware Carbon Black
- Envoy vs Sophos Intercept X
- Envoy vs IBM QRadar
- Envoy vs Tanium
- Envoy vs Darktrace
- Envoy vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Envoy vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Envoy vs Endor Labs
- Envoy vs Enpass
- Envoy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Envoy vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Envoy vs HID Global
- Envoy vs Jamf Pro
- Envoy vs Microsoft Sentinel
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Istio
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Spacelift
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Atlantis
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Jenkins
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Hookdeck
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Restate
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Helix
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Turborepo
- SentinelOne Singularity vs StackBlitz
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Webpack
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Backstage
- SentinelOne Singularity vs OpsLevel
- SentinelOne Singularity vs PartyKit
- SentinelOne Singularity vs PhpStorm
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Pieces for Developers
- SentinelOne Singularity vs RAD Studio
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Refact
- SentinelOne Singularity vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Trend Micro Vision One
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- SentinelOne Singularity vs VMware Carbon Black
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Sophos Intercept X
- SentinelOne Singularity vs IBM QRadar
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Tanium
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Darktrace
- SentinelOne Singularity vs LogRhythm SIEM
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Fortinet FortiGate
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Endor Labs
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Enpass
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- SentinelOne Singularity vs HID Global
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Jamf Pro
- SentinelOne Singularity vs Microsoft Sentinel
