Developer Tools · head to head
Envoy vs Koyeb

Envoy
Developer Tools
A high-performance L7 proxy written in C++ that is configured by an API rather than a config file, and is usually deployed under a control plane.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Koyeb
Cloud
High-performance serverless infrastructure for APIs, inference, and databases
- From
- $29/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Koyeb is a serverless cloud platform.
- Envoy is free; Koyeb starts at $29/mo.
- Only Envoy lists xDS dynamic configuration; only Koyeb lists serverless containers.
- Where Koyeb falls short: pricing starts at $29/month with additional compute costs.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Envoy and Koyeb actually diverge.
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Koyeb.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Envoy
- xDS dynamic configuration
- Protocol breadth
- Filter chain architecture
- Observability by default
- Outlier detection
- Traffic shaping
- mTLS termination and origination
- Hot restart
Only in Koyeb
- Serverless containers
- GPU support
- Global distribution
- Multi-protocol support
- Serverless Postgres
- Zero-downtime deployments
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Envoy
- Acting as the data plane under a service mesh or Gateway API implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use itnot Koyeb
- An edge or API gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxyingnot Koyeb
- Migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow trafficnot Koyeb
- Standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written innot Koyeb
Koyeb
- Deploying AI inference models globally with GPU accelerationnot Envoy
- Building SaaS platforms with automatic scalingnot Envoy
- Running distributed AI agents and background workersnot Envoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Envoy
- The configuration surface is very large and hand-written bootstrap YAML runs to hundreds of lines for routing that Nginx expresses in twenty, which is why nearly every production deployment sits under a control plane and inherits that control plane's constraints as well
- xDS is the real API and it is not stable in the comfortable sense; the v2 API set was removed outright, resource types continue to be deprecated, and your control plane and Envoy binaries have to be upgraded roughly in step or the proxies stop accepting configuration
- Extending it properly means writing a C++ filter and building and maintaining your own Envoy binary; the alternatives are Lua, which adds per-request overhead, and proxy-wasm, whose ABI has remained effectively experimental for years with a real performance cost
- At sidecar density the per-proxy memory and CPU footprint is a measurable share of cluster capacity, since thousands of workloads each carry a full proxy, and this is precisely the cost that has pushed mesh projects towards node-level or ambient architectures
- There is no single vendor selling support for Envoy itself; you get the community plus control-plane vendors such as Solo.io and Tetrate, so an Envoy-level production bug is your own engineers in a C++ codebase unless a support contract happens to cover it
- Diagnosing why a request got a particular response involves reading config dumps, the stats endpoint and the RESPONSE_FLAGS codes in access logs rather than a readable error, which is a specific skill you must hire or spend months growing
Koyeb
- Pricing starts at $29/month with additional compute costs
- GPU compute is expensive at $0.75-$2.50 per hour
- Limited customization for infrastructure configuration
Pricing, plan by plan
Envoy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Envoy review.
Koyeb
$29/month- Pro$29/mo
- $10 included compute
- 10 users
- 100 services
- Scale$299/mo
- $100 included compute
- 50 users
- 1,000 services
- Enterprise$1,000/mo
- Unlimited users
- Custom resources
- SSO/RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose Envoy if
- You need xds dynamic configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want protocol breadth.
Choose Koyeb if
- You need serverless containers.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want gpu support.
Questions people ask
- Is Envoy or Koyeb better?
- Neither clearly leads. Envoy starts at Free and Koyeb at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Envoy or Koyeb?
- Envoy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Envoy and $29/month for Koyeb.
- Does Envoy or Koyeb run on more platforms?
- Envoy runs on Web. Koyeb runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Envoy for free?
- Yes. Envoy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Koyeb starts at $29/month.
- What is Envoy best used for?
- Envoy is most often used for acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it, an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying, migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow traffic, standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written in. Of those, acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it and an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying are not what Koyeb is typically brought in for.
- What can Envoy do that Koyeb cannot?
- Envoy covers xDS dynamic configuration, Protocol breadth, Filter chain architecture, Observability by default. Koyeb covers Serverless containers, GPU support, Global distribution, Multi-protocol support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Envoy: Should I run Envoy on its own, or under a control plane?
Almost always under one. Directly authoring xDS or static bootstrap configuration is viable for a handful of routes and becomes unmanageable beyond that. Envoy Gateway, Istio, Contour, Gloo and Consul all exist to generate that configuration for you.
Koyeb: What are Koyeb's subscription plans?
Pro plan is $29/month with $10 included compute, Scale plan is $299/month with $100 included compute and 99.9% SLA, and Enterprise starts at $1,000/month with unlimited users and 99.99% SLA.
SourceEnvoy: How does it compare with Nginx or HAProxy?
Envoy is dynamically configured over an API and instrumented far more heavily; Nginx and HAProxy are faster to configure and lighter for straightforward reverse proxying. If you never need to change routing without a reload, Envoy is more machinery than the problem requires.
Koyeb: How much does GPU compute cost?
GPU pricing is per-second: RTX-A6000 costs $0.75/hour, A100 costs $1.60/hour, H100 costs $2.50/hour, and 8x H100 costs $20.00/hour.
SourceEnvoy: What does it cost?
Nothing to licence; it is Apache 2.0 and there is no paid edition. The cost is engineering time and, for most organisations, a commercial control plane or cloud service that packages it.
Koyeb: What database options are available?
Koyeb offers serverless Postgres starting at free (0.25 vCPU, 1GB RAM) up to 3XL at $1.28/hour with 8 vCPU and 32GB RAM. Storage costs $0.50/month per GB.
SourceEnvoy: Can I write extensions without C++?
You can write Lua filters or proxy-wasm modules in Rust, Go, C++ or AssemblyScript. Both carry per-request overhead compared with a native filter, and the Wasm path has been slower to stabilise than the project originally projected.
Envoy: Is it a CNCF project?
Yes, it is a graduated CNCF project licensed under Apache 2.0, which means the trademark and governance sit with the foundation rather than with Lyft or any vendor.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Envoy vs Istio
- Envoy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Envoy vs Spacelift
- Envoy vs Atlantis
- Envoy vs Jenkins
- Envoy vs Hookdeck
- Envoy vs Restate
- Envoy vs Helix
- Envoy vs Turborepo
- Envoy vs StackBlitz
- Envoy vs Webpack
- Envoy vs Backstage
- Envoy vs OpsLevel
- Envoy vs PartyKit
- Envoy vs PhpStorm
- Envoy vs Pieces for Developers
- Envoy vs RAD Studio
- Envoy vs Refact
- Envoy vs Render
- Envoy vs Fly.io
- Envoy vs Railway
- Envoy vs Beam Cloud
- Envoy vs Cerebrium
- Envoy vs Northflank
- Envoy vs Upstash
- Envoy vs Deno Deploy
- Envoy vs Serverless Framework
- Envoy vs Neon
- Envoy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Envoy vs Lambda
- Envoy vs Cilium
- Envoy vs Contabo
- Envoy vs Coolify
- Envoy vs Crossplane
- Envoy vs Dokku
- Envoy vs containerd
- Koyeb vs Istio
- Koyeb vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Koyeb vs Spacelift
- Koyeb vs Atlantis
- Koyeb vs Jenkins
- Koyeb vs Hookdeck
- Koyeb vs Restate
- Koyeb vs Helix
- Koyeb vs Turborepo
- Koyeb vs StackBlitz
- Koyeb vs Webpack
- Koyeb vs Backstage
- Koyeb vs OpsLevel
- Koyeb vs PartyKit
- Koyeb vs PhpStorm
- Koyeb vs Pieces for Developers
- Koyeb vs RAD Studio
- Koyeb vs Refact
- Koyeb vs Render
- Koyeb vs Fly.io
- Koyeb vs Railway
- Koyeb vs Beam Cloud
- Koyeb vs Cerebrium
- Koyeb vs Northflank
- Koyeb vs Upstash
- Koyeb vs Deno Deploy
- Koyeb vs Serverless Framework
- Koyeb vs Neon
- Koyeb vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Koyeb vs Lambda
- Koyeb vs Cilium
- Koyeb vs Contabo
- Koyeb vs Coolify
- Koyeb vs Crossplane
- Koyeb vs Dokku
- Koyeb vs containerd
