Databases · head to head
EMQX vs InfluxDB

EMQX
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker for large IoT fleets, relicensed to BSL with production free use limited to one node
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

InfluxDB
Logging
Purpose-built time series database for metrics and events
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: EMQX the move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.; InfluxDB high-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- They diverge on capability: EMQX covers Erlang clustering, InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which EMQX and InfluxDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in EMQX
- Erlang clustering
- MQTT 5.0 and QUIC
- Rule engine
- Data integration sinks
- Session persistence
- Multi protocol gateways
- Authentication and authorisation
- Dashboard and REST API
Only in InfluxDB
- Time-series Storage
- Flux Query Language
- High Write Throughput
- Data Compression
- Retention Policies
- Continuous Queries
- Built-in Dashboards
- Telegraf
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
EMQX
- A connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent MQTT sessions with QUIC for handover across mobile networksnot InfluxDB
- An industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into TimescaleDB or Kafka without writing a consumer servicenot InfluxDB
- An IoT product team that has outgrown a single Mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptionsnot InfluxDB
- A smart building deployment mixing MQTT, CoAP and LwM2M devices on one brokernot InfluxDB
InfluxDB
- Monitoringnot EMQX
- IoT datanot EMQX
- Financial datanot EMQX
- Log analyticsnot EMQX
- Observabilitynot EMQX
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
EMQX
- The move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- The relicensing arrived in a minor release, which caught users who had pinned to 5.x expecting Apache 2.0 terms and forced legal review of existing deployments.
- Running an Erlang/OTP cluster well requires operational knowledge most teams do not have, and diagnosing distribution, mnesia or memory issues means learning a runtime you use for nothing else.
- Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published for the self-managed edition, so the cost of the clustered configuration you actually need is invisible until you talk to sales.
- The Serverless tier caps at around a thousand connections and shares infrastructure, which makes it a prototyping tier rather than a genuine small production option.
InfluxDB
- High-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- No support for joins or transactions like relational databases
- Queries limited to 72-hour window in InfluxDB 3 OSS Core
- Clustering and authentication features absent from community version
Pricing, plan by plan
EMQX
Free- Open Source single nodeFree
- BSL 1.1 licence since version 5.9
- Free production use of one node only
- All former enterprise features visible
- ServerlessFree
- Free monthly quota then pay as you go
- Up to 1,000 connections
- 8 by 5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/month
- Single tenant cluster
- Traffic allowance included
- 24/7 support
- Enterprise self-managed$undefined/year
- Deploy on premises, at the edge or in any cloud
- Clustering licensed
- 256 MB maximum message size
InfluxDB
Free- Cloud Serverless FreeFree
- 5 MB writes per 5 minutes
- 300 MB queries per 5 minutes
- 30 day retention
- Cloud Serverless Usage-Based$undefined/mo
- 0.0025 USD per MB ingested
- 0.012 USD per 100 queries
- 0.002 USD per GB-hour storage
Which should you pick?
Choose EMQX if
- You need erlang clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 and quic.
Choose InfluxDB if
- You need time-series storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- You also want flux query language.
Questions people ask
- Is EMQX or InfluxDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. EMQX starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, EMQX or InfluxDB?
- EMQX starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free.
- Does EMQX or InfluxDB run on more platforms?
- EMQX runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS. InfluxDB runs on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- Can I use EMQX for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is EMQX best used for?
- EMQX is most often used for a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks, an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service, an iot product team that has outgrown a single mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptions, a smart building deployment mixing mqtt, coap and lwm2m devices on one broker. Of those, a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks and an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service are not what InfluxDB is typically brought in for.
- What can EMQX do that InfluxDB cannot?
- EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MQTT 5.0 and QUIC, Rule engine, Data integration sinks. InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage, Flux Query Language, High Write Throughput, Data Compression.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
EMQX: Is EMQX still open source?
Not in the OSI sense since version 5.9. It is source-available under Business Source Licence 1.1, reverting to Apache 2.0 four years after each release.
InfluxDB: Is there a free tier and what are the limits?
InfluxDB 3 Core OSS is free forever for local development and prototyping. Cloud Serverless free tier includes 5 MB writes per 5 minutes, 300 MB queries per 5 minutes, 30 day retention, and 2 databases.
SourceEMQX: Can I run a free cluster?
No. The additional use grant permits free production use of one node; clustering requires a commercial licence.
InfluxDB: Can I self-host InfluxDB?
Yes, InfluxDB 3 Core is fully open source and can be self-hosted with no license required. InfluxDB 3 Enterprise is self-managed and includes a 30-day free trial.
SourceEMQX: What changed for existing users?
Community and enterprise editions merged, so all features are now visible, but the licence terms tightened in the same minor release.
InfluxDB: What are the series cardinality limitations?
InfluxDB is sensitive to high-cardinality data. High cardinality increases RAM usage and can trigger out-of-memory errors, making it unsuitable for some workloads with many unique tag combinations.
SourceEMQX: Which version is still Apache 2.0?
Releases before 5.9 remain under Apache 2.0, and each BSL release converts to Apache 2.0 four years after publication.
InfluxDB: Does InfluxDB support SQL queries?
InfluxDB has limited SQL support. Full SQL is available in InfluxDB 3, but earlier versions support only specific SQL commands and use InfluxQL as the primary query language.
SourceInfluxDB: Can I export my data from InfluxDB?
Yes, data can be exported from InfluxDB using query results. However, the process and supported formats depend on the version and deployment type you are using.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- EMQX vs VerneMQ
- EMQX vs RabbitMQ
- EMQX vs NATS
- EMQX vs Solace PubSub+
- EMQX vs Canary Labs
- EMQX vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- EMQX vs TimescaleDB
- EMQX vs Turso
- EMQX vs Chroma
- EMQX vs DuckDB
- EMQX vs Teradata
- EMQX vs Apache Kafka
- EMQX vs Immuta
- EMQX vs MariaDB
- EMQX vs Materialize
- EMQX vs Oracle Database
- EMQX vs Traceloop
- EMQX vs New Relic
- EMQX vs Checkly
- EMQX vs Cronitor
- EMQX vs Healthchecks
- EMQX vs Uptime.com
- EMQX vs ELK Stack
- EMQX vs Fluentd
- EMQX vs Graylog
- EMQX vs Logz.io
- EMQX vs Honeybadger
- EMQX vs Humio
- EMQX vs Loggly
- EMQX vs Kibana
- EMQX vs Logstash
- InfluxDB vs VerneMQ
- InfluxDB vs RabbitMQ
- InfluxDB vs NATS
- InfluxDB vs Solace PubSub+
- InfluxDB vs Canary Labs
- InfluxDB vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- InfluxDB vs TimescaleDB
- InfluxDB vs Turso
- InfluxDB vs Chroma
- InfluxDB vs DuckDB
- InfluxDB vs Teradata
- InfluxDB vs Apache Kafka
- InfluxDB vs Immuta
- InfluxDB vs MariaDB
- InfluxDB vs Materialize
- InfluxDB vs Oracle Database
- InfluxDB vs Traceloop
- InfluxDB vs New Relic
- InfluxDB vs Checkly
- InfluxDB vs Cronitor
- InfluxDB vs Healthchecks
- InfluxDB vs Uptime.com
- InfluxDB vs ELK Stack
- InfluxDB vs Fluentd
- InfluxDB vs Graylog
- InfluxDB vs Logz.io
- InfluxDB vs Honeybadger
- InfluxDB vs Humio
- InfluxDB vs Loggly
- InfluxDB vs Kibana
- InfluxDB vs Logstash
