Technology · head to head
Eclipse vs NocoDB

Eclipse
Technology
The Eclipse Foundation - home to a global community
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

NocoDB
Spreadsheets
Open-source no-code database platform with REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse high memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed; NocoDB the free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse covers Java development environment, NocoDB covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse and NocoDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse
- Java development environment
- Extensible plugin architecture
- Integrated debugger
- Code refactoring
- Version control integration
- Build automation
- Multi-language support
- Rich client platform
Only in NocoDB
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- No-code database
- Multiple SQL databases
- Webhooks
- Automation
- Cloud support
- Self-hosted support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse
- Java application developmentnot NocoDB
- Enterprise software developmentnot NocoDB
- Web application developmentnot NocoDB
- Plugin developmentnot NocoDB
- Educational programmingnot NocoDB
NocoDB
- Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot Eclipse
- Putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing Postgres or MySQL databasenot Eclipse
- Building internal tools on structured data with an APInot Eclipse
- Team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiersnot Eclipse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse
- High memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed
- Slow startup times and performance degradation with large projects or many open editors
- Requires configuration of eclipse.ini file to optimize heap sizes for adequate performance
- User interface considered outdated compared to modern IDE alternatives
- User base fell from 39% of Java developers in 2024 to 28% in 2025, indicating market decline
NocoDB
- The free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- Records are the metering unit on cloud, so Plus covers 50K and Business 300K rather than scaling by seat alone
- Row-level security, audit log retention and team hierarchy require the Scale tier
- SCIM provisioning and air-gapped deployment are Enterprise only
- The self-hosted Community edition is unlimited on records and seats but does without workflows, scripts and dashboards, which start at the paid self-hosted tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Eclipse review.
NocoDB
Free- Free (Cloud)Free
- 3 editor seats
- 10 commenter seats
- 1 GB storage
- Plus$12/month
- Unlimited seats
- 50,000 records
- 20 GB storage
- Business$24/month
- Unlimited seats
- 300,000 records
- 100 GB storage
- Scale$45/month
- Minimum 3 seats required
- 1,000,000 records
- 150 GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse if
- You need java development environment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want extensible plugin architecture.
Choose NocoDB if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse or NocoDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse starts at Free and NocoDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse or NocoDB?
- Eclipse starts at Free and NocoDB at Free.
- Does Eclipse or NocoDB run on more platforms?
- Eclipse runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. NocoDB runs on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- Can I use Eclipse for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse best used for?
- Eclipse is most often used for java application development, enterprise software development, web application development, plugin development. Of those, java application development and enterprise software development are not what NocoDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse do that NocoDB cannot?
- Eclipse covers Java development environment, Extensible plugin architecture, Integrated debugger, Code refactoring. NocoDB covers REST API, GraphQL API, No-code database, Multiple SQL databases.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse: How much does Eclipse IDE cost?
Eclipse IDE is completely free and open-source, released under the Eclipse Public License 2.0.
SourceNocoDB: Is NocoDB free?
Yes, NocoDB offers a free cloud plan with 3 editor seats, 1,000 records, 1 GB storage, and 1,000 API calls per month. A free self-hosted Community edition with unlimited records and seats is also available.
SourceNocoDB: How much does NocoDB Plus cost?
NocoDB Plus costs $12 per seat per month (billed annually) or $15 per seat per month (monthly). For unlimited seats, it costs $108/month annually or $180/month monthly. Plus includes 50,000 records, 20 GB storage, and 100,000 API calls per month.
SourceNocoDB: What is the difference between NocoDB Plus and Business plans?
Plus ($12/seat annual) includes 50,000 records and 100,000 API calls per month. Business ($24/seat annual) includes 300,000 records, 1,000,000 API calls per month, external database connections, SAML SSO, and table/field permissions.
SourceNocoDB: Can I self-host NocoDB for free?
Yes, NocoDB's Community edition is free for self-hosting. It includes unlimited records, storage, and seats, with all core features including webhooks and 6 view types.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Eclipse vs GitHub
- Eclipse vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Eclipse vs Docker
- Eclipse vs Plane
- Eclipse vs Postgres
- Eclipse vs Storybook
- Eclipse vs Okta
- Eclipse vs Kubernetes
- Eclipse vs PostHog
- Eclipse vs Jira
- Eclipse vs Attio
- Eclipse vs CloudAMQP
- Eclipse vs Dropbox
- Eclipse vs Jenkins
- Eclipse vs Lovable
- Eclipse vs Miro
- Eclipse vs PyCharm
- Eclipse vs WebStorm
- Eclipse vs APITable
- Eclipse vs Teable
- Eclipse vs Looker
- Eclipse vs SeaTable
- Eclipse vs Tableau
- Eclipse vs Metabase
- Eclipse vs Redash
- Eclipse vs Mathesar
- Eclipse vs Baserow
- Eclipse vs Budibase
- Eclipse vs Fibery
- Eclipse vs Apache Superset
- Eclipse vs Coefficient
- Eclipse vs Cube Software
- Eclipse vs Quadratic
- Eclipse vs Rowy
- NocoDB vs GitHub
- NocoDB vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- NocoDB vs Docker
- NocoDB vs Plane
- NocoDB vs Postgres
- NocoDB vs Storybook
- NocoDB vs Okta
- NocoDB vs Kubernetes
- NocoDB vs PostHog
- NocoDB vs Jira
- NocoDB vs Attio
- NocoDB vs CloudAMQP
- NocoDB vs Dropbox
- NocoDB vs Jenkins
- NocoDB vs Lovable
- NocoDB vs Miro
- NocoDB vs PyCharm
- NocoDB vs WebStorm
- NocoDB vs APITable
- NocoDB vs Teable
- NocoDB vs Looker
- NocoDB vs SeaTable
- NocoDB vs Tableau
- NocoDB vs Metabase
- NocoDB vs Redash
- NocoDB vs Mathesar
- NocoDB vs Baserow
- NocoDB vs Budibase
- NocoDB vs Fibery
- NocoDB vs Apache Superset
- NocoDB vs Coefficient
- NocoDB vs Cube Software
- NocoDB vs Quadratic
- NocoDB vs Rowy
