Databases · head to head
DuckDB vs RAD Studio

DuckDB
Databases
MIT-licensed analytical SQL database that runs inside your process, with no server, no dependencies and one writer at a time.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

RAD Studio
Developer Tools
Cross-platform native app development with Delphi and C++Builder
- From
- $2000/perpetual
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- RAD Studio is a cross-platform IDE.
- DuckDB is free; RAD Studio starts at $2000/mo.
- Where RAD Studio falls short: professional edition costs $2,000 for the perpetual license plus $599 for year one maintenance, totaling $2,599 before tax.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DuckDB and RAD Studio actually diverge.
| Attribute | DuckDB | RAD Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2000/perpetual |
| Pricing model | Open-source | One-time |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web | Web |
| Category | Databases | Developer Tools |
Not yet recorded: founded for RAD Studio.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DuckDB
- In-process execution
- Vectorised columnar engine
- Direct file querying
- Zero dependencies
- Larger-than-memory queries
- MIT licence
- Postgres-flavoured SQL
- Extension ecosystem
Only in RAD Studio
Nothing recorded that DuckDB does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DuckDB
- Transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need Spark, replaced by SQL over Parquet in a single processnot RAD Studio
- Analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptablenot RAD Studio
- Local exploration of files that are too large for a pandas dataframe but far too small to justify a warehousenot RAD Studio
- Continuous integration and testing of analytical SQL, where a real engine can run in the test process without provisioning anythingnot RAD Studio
RAD Studio
- Building Windows desktop applications with VCL componentsnot DuckDB
- Creating iOS and Android apps from shared Delphi codebasenot DuckDB
- Connecting to Oracle databases through FireDAC connectivitynot DuckDB
- Building REST web services that run on Linux serversnot DuckDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DuckDB
- A database file accepts one read-write process at a time; other processes must open it read-only and will not see subsequent writes, so DuckDB cannot be the shared database behind several services
- There is no network protocol, authentication or user management, so exposing it to remote clients means writing and securing your own service around it
- It is built for scans and aggregations, not for many small transactions, so a workload of high-frequency single-row inserts and updates performs badly compared with SQLite or Postgres
- Storage files are backwards compatible but not forwards compatible, so a file written by a newer version cannot be read by an older one and every consumer of a shared file must be upgraded together
- Query memory settings matter: some operations still need to hold significant state, so an under-configured memory limit turns a large join or a high-cardinality aggregation into a spill-heavy query or an out-of-memory failure rather than a slow success
RAD Studio
- Professional edition costs $2,000 for the perpetual license plus $599 for year one maintenance, totaling $2,599 before tax
- Enterprise edition steps up to $3,400 license plus $1,199 maintenance, and Architect edition to $4,416 license plus $2,183 maintenance
- The perpetual license only entitles the buyer to updates for one year; continued access to new updates and upgrades requires an annually renewable Update Subscription
Pricing, plan by plan
DuckDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the DuckDB review.
RAD Studio
$2000/perpetual- Professional Edition$2,000 one-off
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $599
- Total $2,599 + Tax
- Enterprise Edition$3,400 one-off
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $1,199
- Total $4,599 + Tax
- Architect Edition$4,416 one-off
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $2,183
- Total $6,599 + Tax
Which should you pick?
Choose DuckDB if
- You need in-process execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want vectorised columnar engine.
Choose RAD Studio if
Nothing in the data separates RAD Studio from DuckDB on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is DuckDB or RAD Studio better?
- Neither clearly leads. DuckDB starts at Free and RAD Studio at $2000/perpetual, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DuckDB or RAD Studio?
- DuckDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for DuckDB and $2000/perpetual for RAD Studio.
- Does DuckDB or RAD Studio run on more platforms?
- DuckDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web. RAD Studio runs on Web.
- Can I use DuckDB for free?
- Yes. DuckDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. RAD Studio starts at $2000/perpetual.
- What is DuckDB best used for?
- DuckDB is most often used for transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need spark, replaced by sql over parquet in a single process, analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptable, local exploration of files that are too large for a pandas dataframe but far too small to justify a warehouse, continuous integration and testing of analytical sql, where a real engine can run in the test process without provisioning anything. Of those, transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need spark, replaced by sql over parquet in a single process and analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptable are not what RAD Studio is typically brought in for.
- What can DuckDB do that RAD Studio cannot?
- DuckDB covers In-process execution, Vectorised columnar engine, Direct file querying, Zero dependencies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DuckDB: Can multiple applications share one DuckDB database?
Not for writing. One process holds the database read-write; others may attach read-only and will not see later writes. Shared multi-writer access needs a different database or a table format with a catalogue.
RAD Studio: How much does RAD Studio cost?
RAD Studio uses perpetual licensing: Professional Edition $2,000 perpetual license + $599 first year maintenance ($2,599 total + tax). Enterprise Edition $3,400 license + $1,199 maintenance ($4,599 total + tax). Architect Edition $4,416 license + $2,183 maintenance ($6,599 total + tax).
SourceDuckDB: Is it a replacement for a data warehouse?
For single-node analytical workloads up to a few hundred gigabytes it very often is. It is not a replacement when many concurrent users need a shared, governed, always-on service.
RAD Studio: What is the difference between RAD Studio editions?
Professional Edition ($2,599 total + tax) targets individual developers. Enterprise Edition ($4,599 total + tax) adds multi-tier app capabilities. Architect Edition ($6,599 total + tax) includes advanced database and cloud features. All three include perpetual licenses.
SourceDuckDB: Do I have to load data into it?
No. It queries Parquet, CSV, JSON and Arrow in place, including on object storage. Its own storage format is optional and mainly useful when you want indexes, constraints and faster repeated access.
RAD Studio: Does RAD Studio offer Kai AI integration and discounts?
Yes, adding Kai AI to any edition provides discounts: 25% off Professional ($2,136 + tax), 30% off Enterprise ($3,394 + tax), and 40% off Architect ($4,109 + tax). This promotion is active through August 31, 2026.
SourceDuckDB: What is MotherDuck's relationship to it?
MotherDuck is a separate company offering a managed and hybrid service built on the DuckDB engine. DuckDB itself remains MIT-licensed and independent of it, with the IP held by the DuckDB Foundation.
DuckDB: Is it suitable for OLTP?
No. It is designed for analytical scans. For transactional workloads with frequent small writes, SQLite or Postgres is the right tool.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DuckDB vs SingleStore
- DuckDB vs SQLite
- DuckDB vs ClickHouse
- DuckDB vs Apache Druid
- DuckDB vs Firebolt
- DuckDB vs OpenSearch
- DuckDB vs StarRocks
- DuckDB vs QuestDB
- DuckDB vs BigQuery
- DuckDB vs Elasticsearch
- DuckDB vs Materialize
- DuckDB vs Oracle Database
- DuckDB vs TimescaleDB
- DuckDB vs Trino
- DuckDB vs Turso
- DuckDB vs Amazon RDS
- DuckDB vs Apache Pinot
- DuckDB vs Apache Flink
- DuckDB vs CLion
- DuckDB vs Visual Studio Code
- DuckDB vs JetBrains Rider
- DuckDB vs GitHub Desktop
- DuckDB vs Postman
- DuckDB vs StackBlitz
- DuckDB vs Visual Studio
- DuckDB vs Docker
- DuckDB vs Kubernetes
- DuckDB vs GNAT Pro
- DuckDB vs Penpot
- DuckDB vs GitLab CI/CD
- DuckDB vs GitHub Copilot
- DuckDB vs LaunchDarkly
- DuckDB vs Terraform
- DuckDB vs CodeSandbox
- DuckDB vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- DuckDB vs GitLab
- RAD Studio vs SingleStore
- RAD Studio vs SQLite
- RAD Studio vs ClickHouse
- RAD Studio vs Apache Druid
- RAD Studio vs Firebolt
- RAD Studio vs OpenSearch
- RAD Studio vs StarRocks
- RAD Studio vs QuestDB
- RAD Studio vs BigQuery
- RAD Studio vs Elasticsearch
- RAD Studio vs Materialize
- RAD Studio vs Oracle Database
- RAD Studio vs TimescaleDB
- RAD Studio vs Trino
- RAD Studio vs Turso
- RAD Studio vs Amazon RDS
- RAD Studio vs Apache Pinot
- RAD Studio vs Apache Flink
- RAD Studio vs CLion
- RAD Studio vs Visual Studio Code
- RAD Studio vs JetBrains Rider
- RAD Studio vs GitHub Desktop
- RAD Studio vs Postman
- RAD Studio vs StackBlitz
- RAD Studio vs Visual Studio
- RAD Studio vs Docker
- RAD Studio vs Kubernetes
- RAD Studio vs GNAT Pro
- RAD Studio vs Penpot
- RAD Studio vs GitLab CI/CD
- RAD Studio vs GitHub Copilot
- RAD Studio vs LaunchDarkly
- RAD Studio vs Terraform
- RAD Studio vs CodeSandbox
- RAD Studio vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- RAD Studio vs GitLab
